Cited by 4,504Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination

Bertrand, Marianne, Mullainathan, Sendhil·2004·American Economic Review

Abstract

We study race in the labor market by sending fictitious resumes to help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers. To manipulate perceived race, resumes are randomly assigned African-American- or White-sounding names. White names receive 50 percent more callbacks for interviews. Callbacks are also more responsive to resume quality for White names than for African-American ones. The racial gap is uniform across occupation, industry, and employer size. We also find little evidence that employers are inferring social class from the names. Differential treatment by race still appears to still be prominent in the U.S. labor market.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/0002828042002561

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Job applicants with African American-associated names receive fewer callbacks despite identical qualifications.

    “job applicants with African American-associated names receive fewer callbacks despite identical qualifications [10]”
  • Names reliably trigger differential treatment in experimental research.

    “Names reliably trigger differential treatment in experimental research”
  • The original Bertrand and Mullainathan study found a 50% callback gap.

    “the original Bertrand and Mullainathan [10] study finding a 50% callback gap.”
  • In Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004), résumés with white names were 50 percent more likely than those with black names to receive callbacks, 9.7 versus 6.5 percent.

    “Résumés with white names were 50 percent more likely than those with black names to receive callbacks from employers (9.7 versus 6.5 percent).”

    From Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment (2009) · cites this paper as Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004)

  • Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) used a correspondence test that randomly assigned résumé characteristics to white- and black-sounding names, largely removing concerns about unobserved characteristics.

    “Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) remove tester effects in a “correspondence test” that sent résumés with common white and black names to employers in Boston and Chicago. Their design allows the random assignment of résumé characteristics to white- and black-sounding names, largely removing concerns about unobserved characteristics.”

    From Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment (2009) · cites this paper as Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S.
Affiliations
  • Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2004-09-01
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
991-1013
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123223998
Cited by
4,504
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 261 · 2025: 349 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 295 · 2022: 322 · 2021: 304 · 2020: 341 · 2019: 376 · 2018: 251 · 2017: 226 · 2016: 206 · 2015: 170 · 2014: 214 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 144
FWCI
186.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
racial discrimination in labor markets, name-based discrimination, perceived race, callbacks, job applications, hiring discrimination, Boston, Chicago

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review