Persistence of power, Elites, and institutions
Abstract
We construct a model to study the implications of changes in political institutions for economic institutions. A change in political institutions alters the distribution of de jure political power, but creates incentives for investments in de facto political power to partially or even fully offset change in de jure power. The model can imply a pattern of captured democracy, whereby a democratic regime may survive but choose economic institutions favoring an elite. The model provides conditions under which economic or policy outcomes will be invariant to changes in political institutions, and economic institutions themselves will persist over time. (JEL D02, D72) The domination of an organized minority … over the unorganized majority is inevitable. The power of any minority is irresistible as against each single individual in the majority, who stands alone before the totality of the organized minority. At the same time, the minority is organized for the very reason that it is a minority. —Gaetano Mosca (1939, 53).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutions and actors are not power-neutral.
“Institutions and actors are not power-neutral (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2008;Moe, 2005).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Acemoglu and Robinson, 2008
Cites
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Gaming Democracy: Elite Dominance during Transition and the Prospects for Redistribution
Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2014) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000124 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Economics, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, E52-380, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142.
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Robinson, James A
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-293
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125033761
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 128.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Keywords
- political institutions, economic institutions, institutional persistence, political elites, institutional change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review