The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Mobile Phones Improve Learning? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Niger
Abstract
The returns to educational investments hinge on whether such investments can improve the quality and persistence of educational gains. We report the results from a randomized evaluation of an adult education program in Niger, in which some students learned how to use simple mobile phones (Project ABC). Students in ABC villages achieved test scores that were 0.19–0.26 standard deviations higher than those in standard adult education classes, and standardized math test scores remained higher seven months after the end of classes. These results suggest that simple information technology can be harnessed to improve educational outcomes among rural populations. (JEL D83, I21, O15, O33)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501
Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India
Banerjee, A. V., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1235 · Cited by 1,398
Technology's Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction
Barrow, L., Markman, L., & Rouse, C. E. (2009) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.1.1.52 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence
Oster, E. (2019) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711 · Cited by 5,367
Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa
Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.207 · Cited by 2,216
Self-citationThe long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money
Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah5309 · Cited by 1,628
Information from Markets Near and Far: Mobile Phones and Agricultural Markets in Niger
Aker, J. C. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.2.3.46 · Cited by 746
Self-citationLewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20140258 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Aker, J. C., Ksoll, C., & Lybbert, T. J.
- Venue
- American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 94-120
- ISSN
- 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2157474793
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can Mobile Phones Improve Learning? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Niger. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/app.4.4.94
- The paper
- Aker, J. C., Ksoll, C., & Lybbert, T. J. (2012). Can Mobile Phones Improve Learning? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.94
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.