The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative AI for Economic Research: Use Cases and Implications for Economists
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize research. I analyze how large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT can assist economists by describing dozens of use cases in six areas: ideation and feedback, writing, background research, data analysis, coding, and mathematical derivations. I provide general instructions and demonstrate specific examples of how to take advantage of each of these, classifying the LLM capabilities from experimental to highly useful. I argue that economists can reap significant productivity gains by taking advantage of generative AI to automate micro-tasks. Moreover, these gains will grow as the performance of AI systems continues to improve. I also speculate on the longer-term implications of AI-powered cognitive automation for economic research. The online resources associated with this paper explain how to get started and will provide regular updates on the latest capabilities of generative AI in economics. (JEL A11, C45, D83, I23, O33)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The application of LLMs in economics, particularly ChatGPT, is a relatively unexplored area.”
From Can ChatGPT forecast stock price movements? Return predictability and large language models (2026) · cites this paper as Korinek (2023)
In the citing paper
“There is cause for optimism: AI can complement workers by making them more efficient, helping them to produce higher quality work, or enabling them to take on new value-adding tasks (72–74).”
From The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08361 · Cited by 9,550 · cited 1×
“The performance of LLMs improves pre-dictably according to so-called scaling laws, which are empirical regularities that have held for several generations of machine learning models (Kaplan et al. 2020).”
BackgroundOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 2×
“The reactions to the release of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have been sharply divided: One camp of commentators label LLMs as nothing but “stochastic parrots” (Bender et al. 2021) or “advanced autocom-plete.””
BackgroundChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 2,330 · cited 1×
“Eloundou et al. (2023) and Felten et al. (2023) analyze how different occupations and industries will be affected by LLMs. Horton (2023) explores the use of LLMs as simulated economic agents.”
BackgroundExperimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh2586 · Cited by 2,150 · cited 1×
“Noy and Zhang (2023) demonstrate in a controlled experiment that ChatGPT made writers 40 percent faster while improving output quality and helping writers with weaker skills more, thereby reducing output inequality.”
BackgroundSparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.12712 · Cited by 1,526
Gentzkow, M. A., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20181020 · Cited by 1,353
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Agrawal, Ajay, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb. 2018. Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Tabarrok Alexander T., 2023, GMU Working Paper in Economics, 23
- Frank, Robert H. 1991. "Positional Externalities." In Strategy and Choice, edited by Richard Zeckhauser, 25-47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Alan, 1950, Mind, 59, 433
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–293 of 293
Intelligent manufacturing and firm productivity: Textual evidence from China
Zhang, Z. (2025) · China Economic Journal · doi:10.1080/17538963.2025.2603018
“…2023; Hu et al. 2024), but systematic empirical tests remain rare and yield heterogeneous findings: positive average effects for generative AI (Korinek 2023), null or ambiguous outcomes for AI-related patents (Parteka and Kordalska 2023), and context-dependent impacts for robot density (Yang…”
Artificial Intelligence and CrowdfundingPreprint
Momtaz, P. P., Wiklund, J., & Yuan, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5987114
Generative AI Use Cases for Data Processing and Analysis
Kolade, O., Egbetokun, A., & Owoseni, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02440-4_4
Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance University Economics Teaching: Implications and Methods
Garcı́a, A. M. L., Tacero, M. D., Romero, G. D., & Ramírez, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08213-8_5
Market Simulations and Custom GPTS as Tools for Active Learning in “Introduction to Economics”
Miñarro, J. C. C., & García, A. R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08213-8_14
Generative AI Applications in Research Design
Kolade, O., Egbetokun, A., & Owoseni, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02440-4_2
Jaiswal, A. K., & Tang, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06046-4_9
Generative AI in Immersive Museums: Quantitative Evaluation of Artistry and Visitor Experience
Shu, X., & Yang, S. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Technology, Digital Media and Communication · doi:10.1145/3783669.3783678
“[ 4 ]Their architecture consists of two main components: a generator and a discriminator.”
Fake Date Tests: Can We Trust In-sample Accuracy of LLMs in Macroeconomic Forecasting?Preprint
Eliseev, A., & Seleznev, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6035916
Generative Agents and Expectations: Do LLMs Align with Heterogeneous Agent Models?Preprint
Gusella, F., & Vicario, E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6066372
Palavali, D. R., & Pothireddy, S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Computing (ETECOM) · doi:10.1109/etecom66111.2025.11319090
“For example, generative AI assists with survey design, coding, and literature mapping for social science and economics [14], [15], [16] while in medicine, it enables privacy-preserving synthetic data generation for personalized healthcare [1], [12], [16].”
USING NEURAL NETWORKS TO OPTIMIZING INDUSTRY ECONOMIC CHAINS (USING THE EXAMPLE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY)
Александровна, Д. Н., Timokhin, D., & Trubacheev, E. V. (2025) · Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 3: Экономика. Экология · doi:10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2025.4.10
Chang, S. E., & Chung, K.-C. (2026) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math14050869 · Cited by 1
How did people tweet against inflation in Japan?
Sekine, T., & Wada, T. (2026) · Japanese Economic Review · doi:10.1007/s42973-026-00236-w
“Dell (2024), Korinek (2023), Korinek (2024) and Kwon et al. (2024) discuss potential usage of LLM in economics.”
Reliable Empirical Accounting Research in the Age of Generative AIPreprint
Zhang, V., Song, M., & Rigsby, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6257458
Who Do FinTech Users Trust for Market Forecasts: AI or Human Expert?Preprint
Bosompim, P., Essieku, R., & Tarkom, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6415477
Suresh, V. K., & Rawat, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1692465
“We do not explicate the LLMs further, Korinek (2023) and Dell (2024) provide a comprehensive guide on their day-to-day use case.”
Reproducibility and Open Science in Economics
Vilhuber, L. (2026) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.765.0697
Collusive Content in Corporate CommunicationsPreprint
Azevedo, E. M., Harrington, J. E., & Rusu, I. O. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6357778
Hasançebi, D. (2026) · 3 SEKTÖR SOSYAL EKONOMİ DERGİSİ · doi:10.63556/tisej.2026.1781
“Gravel and colleagues, working with medical questions, show that ChatGPT can generate responses supported by citations that look formally correct yet are fabricated or only partially accurate (2023, pp. 226–230).”
Decoding central bank communications with large language models
Chen, K., Granville, B., & Matoušek, R. (2026) · Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2026.102325
Keenan, M., Karachiwalla, N., Koo, J., Mwangi, C. W., Breisinger, C., & Kim, M. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0342852
“…explore instructors’ perceptions about AI in Palestinian universities, [38] studies techno-stress to professors in Palestinian universities, and [2] and [8] note that idea generation, feedback, coding, and summarizing and improving text are some of the main use-cases of AI for economic research…”
Deep Research on a Loop: Using AI Agents to Construct Economic DatasetsPreprint
Galiani, S., Afonso, S., Gálvez, R. H., & Sosa, R. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6502499
The End of the Mega-Team Audit: AI Agents and the Zero-Friction Counterfactual in ReproducibilityPreprint
Zhang, T., & Zhu, Z. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6537180
Kniivilä, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6407981
The Rise of Generative AI: From Foundations to Creative Frontiers
Sardar, T. H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19632-3_2
Can AI Do Financial Research? LLM-Guided Hypothesis Discovery in Asset PricingPreprint
Liu, H., Liu, M., Liu, Z., & Mei, D. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6569258
Huang, R., Hua, G., & Chen, Z. (2026) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-10-2025-1505
Is the current AI curriculum sufficient? Preparing for the AGI era beyond ANI
You, S., Na, E., & Paik, S. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-026-10077-8
“…students to use specific AI tools—a paradigm rooted in Artificial Narrow Intelli - gence (ANI) (Holmes et al., 2019; UNESCO, 2022 )—recent technological advances toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) reveal significant limitations in this approach (Bubeck et al., 2023 ; Korinek, 2023 ).”
How Can Generative AI Assist in Business Forecasting Techniques?
Ganguli, S., Mercado, A., Byrnes, C. J., Davitt, J. D., FitzPatrick, J. J., Howell, C., & Lagun, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09905-1_18
Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Thopate, K., Musale, P., Jagtap, S. P., Shewale, C., & Rode, M. B. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407613
Farrell, W., Tavoletti, E., SINGH, D. P., Leigh, J. S. A., & Taras, V. (2026) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101428 · Cited by 3
Mapping capabilities for Smart Specialisation: an LLM-based approach
Mamede, R. P., Andrade, M., Pinheiro, C., Alves, T., Martins, T., Mendes, B., & Paiva-Silva, J. (2026) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scag038
Replace, Reimagine, Recombine: Building an Artificial Intelligence Nation
Blit, J. (2026) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2025-036
Edwards, K. M., Tehranchi, F., Miller, S., & Ahmed, F. (2026) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4071835 · Cited by 1
Can LLMs Mimic Household Surveys?: From Representative Agents to Population DistributionsPreprint
Dalloul, A., & Pfeifer, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6703798
Despliegue de n8n en producción para automatización de flujos de trabajo
Garcia, E. P. I., & Estrada, J. C. C. (2026) · Cuadernos Técnicos Universitarios de la DGTIC · doi:10.22201/dgtic.30618096e.2026.4.2.171
Divergence in Climate Change Communication: LLM-based Evidence from the IPCC and the PressPreprint
Galiani, S., Giglia, F. M. L., & Sosa, R. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6752298
Artificial intelligence in financial markets: a literature review and research agenda
Gong, S.-S., Han, S., Kou, Z.-Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, L. (2026) · China Accounting and Finance Review · doi:10.1108/cafr-08-2025-0189 · Cited by 1
Empirical Modeling of AI-Driven Software Development Costs and Associated Workforce Risks
Jaiswal, R. (2026) · International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS) · doi:10.1109/icaiss68683.2026.11526249
“On the automation side, a number of economic studies such as [12], [13] have tried to compare the costs of AI systems to those of human workers, often from a broad or industry-wide perspective.”
The disruptive turn in scientific workflows: Human orchestration of agentic AI in empirical researchPreprint
Nigro, C., Iannuzzi, E., Gioia, L. D., Popolo, R., & Caputo, F. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6852810
Mapping AI feedback under emotional prompts: a sentiment-topic-network approach
xiangming, L., & Wei, W. (2026) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-04-2025-0121
Fiscal Foresight and Long-Term Interest Rates: Evidence from High-Frequency Text Data in Japan
Kameda, K., Lu, Z., & Fukui, M. (2026) · IMF Economic Review · doi:10.1057/s41308-026-00314-4
CFOs Meet LLMsPreprint
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Jha, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6920881
A Review of Nowcasting, Forecasting and AI in Economic Indicator Prediction
Var, Ö., Durmuşoğlu, A., & Dereli, T. (2026) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-026-11380-1
Can overseas R&D promote digital innovation? The mechanism of dual innovation networks
Cao, Y., Yang, Z., & Li, Q. (2026) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2026.105521
Pangngay, J. J., Mondina, K. L., Latoja, M. A., Lazaga, M. J., & Caranay, L. (2026) · Raniag International Journal of Education Management and Social Action · doi:10.66332/ed.fadf2971
Luo, J., Li, S., Wang, M., Cao, X., & Li, H. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2026.3708984
“In economics, GenAI can assist economists in numerous areas, including idea generation and feedback, writing, investigation, data analysis, coding, and mathematical reasoning [23].”
Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve İktisat Eğitimi: Bizi Ne Bekliyor?
Yolusever, A. (2026) · Iğdır Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.58618/igdiriibf.1946886
EEG-Driven Music Generation with Latent Discrete Diffusion Models
Fukumoto, H., & Omori, T. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9575-4_14
Zhu, Y., Zhang, B., Gong, M., Wang, G., Xiong, B., & Xie, C. (2026) · 中国科学基金 · doi:10.3724/bnsfc-2025-0267
Balderlou, S. B., & Shakya, S. (2026) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.2026.2695361
Odularu, G. O. A., & Dafong, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01214-2_15
Understanding Firms’ AI Efforts and Their Economic Impact
Babina, T. (2026) · The Review of Corporate Finance Studies · doi:10.1093/rcfs/cfag027 · Cited by 1
Allocating faculty compute budgets
Gans, J. S. (2026) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-026-01446-x
Nabil, A. N. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10477332/v1
Randomness In Large Language Models: What Researchers Need to Know (And Report)Preprint
Coqueret, G., Llull, J., Oswald, F., Pérignon, C., Scheuch, C., & Vilhuber, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7191580 · Cited by 1
Understanding Firms' AI Efforts and Their Economic ImpactPreprint
Babina, T. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6623645
L'IA et l'IA générative à l'université
Vialfont, A. (2026) · doi:10.3917/ems.marzo.2026.01.0053
Neuberger, F. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7171998
Corruption and Talent AllocationPreprint
Xun, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7242916
How to Do Research With AI : An Austrian Capital Theory Approach
Berg, C. (2026) · Australian Economic Papers · doi:10.1111/1467-8454.70031
ChatGPT accessibility and audit quality: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
Du, X., Zhang, X., & Lai, S. (2026) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2026.101950 · Cited by 2
Etuk, A. S., Stephen, B. U.-A., Udoh, E. A., Adedoyin, A. D., Asuquo, P., Thomas, S., Oyeleke, O. D., Etuk, A., & Samuel, I. I. (2026) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202673503002
Lin, Y., & Xue, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7321294
Ganguli, S. (2026) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2026.2719702
Pei, Y. (2026) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202623601017
“However, there is a caveat: heavy usage of code generated by AI can lead to students having only a surface understanding of the relevant statistical methods [8].”
ELARA: A Framework for Empirical Legal Research with AI AgentsPreprint
Choi, J. H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7349078
Mountain, B., & Kant, S. (2026) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.1177/01956574261473493
Generative AI and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Peanut Farmers in ChinaPreprint
Zhang, F., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10522514/v1
Ferrara, L., & de Roux, N. (2026) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2026.104344
Reading the Fund: A Systematic Analysis of IMF Fiscal Advice Using Large Language ModelsPreprint
Korinek, A., Amgalan, J., & Cohen-Setton, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7383966
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in academic research: Adoption, productivity, and skill perceptions
Muscio, A., & Shibayama, S. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103536 · Cited by 1
Lin, Y., & Xue, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7404269
Development research in the age of AI: The need for future and interdisciplinary studies integration
Pham, T. T., & Christoph, J. N. (2026) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2026.103912
The future of large-scale experiments and their challenges in the digital era
Holtz, D., Bojinov, I., Johari, R., Kallus, N., Lal, A., Anand, S., Carlson, K., Cohn, B., Cunningham, T., Deng, A., et al. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02582-6
yuan, W., & Zheng, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10487555/v1
Bespoke methods in economics. Method construction and the portability of warrant
Kwarciński, T. (2026) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2026.2737102
Ilomuanya, S. E., Oladosu, M. A., MUSTAPHA, T. O., & Abah, M. A. (2026) · International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering · doi:10.35940/ijsce.e3728.16051126
AlGhanem, N., Sarpong, D., & Braganza, A. (2025) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-07-2025-781
Complex global interdependencies between economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk indices
Souma, W., Roma, C. M. D. S., & Vodenska, I. (2026) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2026.2716868
LLM Hallucination of Citations in Economics Persists With Web‐Enabled Models
Buchanan, J. A., Hill, S. E., & Shapoval, O. (2026) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.70069 · Cited by 2
Cultural lag in a two-speed economy: Dynamics, traps, and the optimal pace of technological progressPreprint
Shen, Y., & Cen, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7592705
A practitioner’s guide to using large language models and generative AI in economic history
Ferrara, A. (2026) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2026.101790
AI-Driven Human Task Substitution: Evidence from Google Translate and ChatGPT
Yilmaz, E. D., Naumovska, I., & Aggarwal, V. A. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.06740 · Cited by 30
Does Generative AI Substitute for Researchers?: Evidence from Academic Journal AuthorshipPreprint
Yang, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7611380
Just a Simulation? A Review of Large Language Models as Subjects in Experimental EconomicsPreprint
Kitadai, A., & Nishino, N. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7613458
Cheap Production, Costly Verification: Doing Research under Agentic AI and AutomationPreprint
Nguyen, M. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7631798
Sarastov, Z. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11429290/v1
Economic Evolution in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Cai, X., Chen, H., Hong, Y., Zhang, M., 刘作仪, Wu, G., Chen, Z., & Wu, L. (2026) · 中国科学基金 · doi:10.3724/bnsfc-2026-0204
Large language models for computational social science
Xu, F., Shao, C., Chen, L., Zeng, Q., Chen, Z., Sukiennik, N., Wang, J., Gao, C., Wang, H., Lian, J., et al. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02539-9 · Cited by 1
Deep learning in finance: a bibliometric review
Wahlstrøm, R. R. (2026) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2026.2754966
Metadata
- Authors
- Korinek, A.
- Affiliations
- Brookings Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- Korinek, Anton
- ORCID
- Korinek, Anton
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2023-12-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1281-1317
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389615177
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 27.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- generative AI, large language models, ChatGPT, economic research, research productivity, cognitive automation, academic writing, background research, data analysis, coding, mathematical derivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review