Language Models and Cognitive Automation for Economic Research
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have the potential to revolutionize research in economics and other disciplines.I describe 25 use cases along six domains in which LLMs are starting to become useful as both research assistants and tutors: ideation, writing, background research, data analysis, coding, and mathematical derivations.I provide general instructions and demonstrate specific examples for how to take advantage of each of these, classifying the LLM capabilities from experimental to highly useful.I hypothesize that ongoing advances will improve the performance of LLMs across all of these domains, and that economic researchers who take advantage of LLMs to automate micro tasks will become significantly more productive.Finally, I speculate on the longer-term implications of cognitive automation via LLMs for economic research.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Korinek (2023) surveys 25 use cases in which large language models can assist economic research across six domains—ideation, writing, background research, data analysis, coding, and mathematical derivations—and rates their usefulness as of Feb 1, 2023. The paper argues LLMs are most useful for automating micro tasks and as tutors, while warning that they hallucinate, require human oversight, and may eventually reshape cognitive labor.
Key findings
- The paper describes 25 use cases across six domains and classifies LLM capabilities from experimental to highly useful on a 1–3 scale, with examples including brainstorming, editing, summarizing, coding, data extraction, and mathematical derivations.
- LLMs are most useful for micro tasks because of high speed and low transaction cost; the author posits researchers can significantly increase productivity, with humans focusing on comparative advantage such as posing questions, evaluating content, editing, and organizing research.
- Reported context includes that ChatGPT gained more than 100m users in its first two months, that ChatGPT had a tested IQ of 147 on a verbal-linguistic IQ test per Thompson (2023), and that training compute of top deep learning models doubled on average every six months, implying a thousand-fold increase every five years (Sevilla et al., 2022).
- Observed failures include math derivations becoming “largely gibberish” after errors, hallucinated literature citations, inconsistent coding for full economic simulations, and risk that simulated human subjects propagate false stereotypes.
Methods
- This is a perspective/working paper based on the author’s own exploration of LLM use cases; it has no formal empirical design, dataset, or statistical analysis.
- The author uses the leading publicly available system at the time, GPT-3 (text-davinci-003), with Temperature set to 0 for deterministic responses, and demonstrates prompts and outputs across six domains.
- Usefulness ratings are subjective and reported as of Feb 1, 2023; the paper also draws on cited literature on scaling laws, emergent abilities, simulated agents, and mathematical capabilities.
Limitations
- Stated: LLMs hallucinate while sounding authoritative; the tested system has a 2021 training-data cutoff, cannot access the internet, has no memory across sessions, and is limited to 4000 tokens per request (about 3000 words); small prompt changes can produce completely different outputs; ultimate responsibility rests with the human user.
- Stated: literature search is limited and citations must be double-checked; mathematical abilities are limited and the error ratio was too high for useful derivations; coding is insufficient for full economic simulations; simulated human subjects risk propagating false stereotypes.
- Evident: the usefulness ratings are subjective and tied to one model and date (Feb 1, 2023); the examples are illustrative rather than a systematic benchmark; long-term implications are explicitly speculative.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ Python code to calculate the Fibonacci numbers def Fibonacci(n): if n<0: print("Incorrect input") # First Fibonacci number is 0 elif n==1: return 0 # Second Fibonacci number is 1 elif n==2: return 1 else: return Fibonacci(n-1)+Fibonacci(n-2) # Driver Program print(Fibonacci(9))
LLMs can still be useful assistants for automating micro tasks involved in economic simulation problems.
“However, LLMs can still be useful assistants for automating micro tasks involved in such problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Python code to calculate the Fibonacci numbers def Fibonacci(n): if n<0: print("Incorrect input") # First Fibonacci number is 0 elif n==1: return 0 # Second Fibonacci number is 1 elif n==2: return 1 else: return Fibonacci(n-1)+Fibonacci(n-2) # Driver Program print(Fibonacci(9))
The current capabilities of publicly available LLMs are insufficient to write the full code to simulate most economic problems without human help.
“The current capabilities of publicly available LLMs are insucient to write the full code to simulate most economic problems without human help”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The system blatantly made up articles and citation information when asked to generate bibtex references for works with lower citation counts.
“However, to be sure, I would double-check the information for all but the most highly cited papers the system blatantly made up articles and citation information when I asked it to generate bibtex references for works with lower citation counts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For high-level mistakes such as mistakes in the algorithms underlying the code, human debugging is still required.
“For high-level mistakes such as mistakes in the algorithms underlying the code, human debugging is still required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Current LLMs have some limited ability to explain simple models.
“Current LLMs also have some limited ability to explain simple models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
When asked to solve the bat-and-the-ball problem without intermediate steps, the system frequently committed the classic human fallacy, suggesting incorrectly that the ball cost $.10.
“Interestingly, when I tried variations of the prompt, for example by just stating Solve the bat-and-the-ball problem: the system frequently committed the classic human fallacy in the bat-and-the-ball problem, i.e., it suggested incorrectly that the ball cost $.10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ratio of mistakes in mathematical derivations is too high for the system to be useful in this application.
“I attempted several other derivations and found the ratio of mistakes too high for the system to be useful in this application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The system's ability to assess Fed-speak was not quite nuanced enough to identify whether the December 2022 or February 2023 FOMC statement was more hawkish.
“I also explored whether the system could identify whether the December 2022 or February 2023 FOMC statement was more hawkish, but its ability to assess Fed-speak was not quite nuanced enough”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
LLMs frequently generate more reliable content when asked to show their intermediate steps, called chain-of-thought prompting.
“This is related to an interesting phenomenon: LLMs frequently generate more reliable content when asked to show their intermediate steps, called chain-of-thought prompting akin to students who are less error-prone when they are asked to explain the intermediate steps behind the solutions that they report (Wei et al., 2022b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wei et al., 2022b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
LLMs display some useful capabilities in debugging code.
“LLMs display some useful capabilities in this domain, as shown in the following example:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The training compute of top-end deep learning models has doubled on average every six months.
“Over the past decade, the training compute of top-end deep learning models has doubled on average every six months, implying a thousand-fold increase every ve years (Sevilla et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sevilla et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
LLMs exhibit quick response times and low transaction cost that make them useful for outsourcing micro tasks in which they are still error-prone and in which similarly capable human research assistants would not be competitive.
“One common theme in all the applications I will demonstrate is that LLMs exhibit such quick response times and low transaction cost that they are useful for outsourcing micro tasks in which they are still error-prone and in which similarly capable human research assistants would not be competitive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The responses of LLMs cannot always be trusted, even on what seems like rather basic questions about fundamental concepts.
“This illustrates that although they give clear and impressive responses in many instances the responses of LLMs cannot always be trusted, even on what seems like rather basic questions about fundamental concepts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
It is optimal to use increases in compute for scaling parameter counts and size of training data of LLMs in approximately equal proportions.
“These laws also imply that it is optimal to use increases in compute for scaling the parameter counts and the size of the training data of LLMs in approximately equal proportions (Homann et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Homann et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The goodness-of-fit of LLMs, as measured by log-loss, improves according to a power law function of training compute, parameter count, and size of training data.
“The scaling laws observe that the goodness-of-t of LLMs, as measured by their log-loss, improves according to a power law function of the amount of training compute, i.e., the number of computations performed to train the model, as well as of the parameter count and size of training data (Kaplan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The overall performance of LLMs improves according to fairly predictable scaling laws.
“The overall performance of LLMs improves according to fairly predictable scaling laws, i.e., empirical regularities that have held for several generations of machine learning models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Argyle et al. (2022) condition GPT3 on socio-demographic backstories of real humans and demonstrate that subsequent answers to survey questions are highly correlated with the actual responses of humans with the described backgrounds, in a nuanced and multifaceted manner.
“They condition GPT3 on the socio-demographic backstories of real humans and demonstrate that subsequent answers to survey questions are highly correlated with the actual responses of humans with the described backgrounds, in a nuanced and multifaceted manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Argyle et al. (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 81
- May combine two claims. 30
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe LLM answered other concept questions superbly, including the invisible hand theorem, Monte Carlo simulation, Cournot versus Bertrand equilibrium, leading theories of exchange rate determination, and several more.
“Other concept questions that the LLM answered superbly included the following, for which I am leaving out the responses for space reasons:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenWhen asked for citations, LLMs may hallucinate and make up authoritative-sounding papers that do not actually exist.
“When asked for citations, there is a risk that they may hallucinate and make up authoritative-sounding papers that do not actually exist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataLLMs can evaluate different ideas by providing pros and cons of different research plans.
“They can also evaluate dierent ideas, in particular by providing pros and cons of different research plan.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe LLM confuses the two fundamental theorems of welfare economics.
“The two fundamental theorems of welfare economics are cornerstones of modern economics, but for some reason the LLM confuses the two.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can translate rough bullet points into well-structured sentences that are clear and easy to read.
“One of the most useful capabilities of LLMs may be to translate rough bullet points into well-structured sentences that are clear and easy to read.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe channels listed by the model for AI and inequality are on-topic, largely reasonable, and span a wide range of what the author could think of plus some more.
“The channels listed by the model are not path-breaking, but they are on-topic, largely reasonable, and span a wide range of what I could think of plus some more.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can evaluate text for its style, its clarity, or similar.
“LLMs can also evaluate text for its style, its clarity, or similar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLLMs are very capable at summarizing text and usually adept at extracting the most relevant content from a passage.
“First, LLMs are very capable at summarizing.They are usually adept at extracting the most relevant content from a passage of text”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can write, edit, modify, translate, or debug snippets of code based on instructions in plain English or other common languages.
“They can write, edit, modify, translate, or debug snippets of code based on instructions in plain English (or other common languages).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can convert text to be comprehensible to readers of different levels.
“Another useful application is that the system can convert text to be comprehensible to readers of dierent levels”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLLMs can act as a tutor and explain many common economic concepts very clearly at a level that is quite useful for students who are trying to learn new, and even for more advanced researchers who are branching out beyond their main area of expertise.
“LLMs can act as a tutor and explain many common economic concepts very clearly at a level that is quite useful for students who are trying to learn new, and even for more advanced researchers who are branching out beyond their main area of expertise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can be very useful for writing code, in particular for standard programming tasks, data manipulation and repetitive tasks.
“LLMs can be very useful for writing code, in particular for standard programming tasks, data manipulation and repetitive tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLLMs are quite capable and useful for many tasks related to writing, from synthesizing text based on bullet points, changing the style of text, editing text, evaluating styles, and generating titles, headlines, and tweets.
“This implies that they are quite capable and useful for many tasks related to writing, from synthesizing text based on bullet points, changing the style of text, editing text, evaluating styles, and generating titles, headlines, and tweets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataLLMs can explain their edits afterwards so that students can learn from corrections.
“As illustrated by the follow-up question, the system can even even explain its edits afterwards so that students can learn from any corrections it has made.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningLLMs are of limited usefulness for searching the literature.
“LLMs are of limited usefulness for searching the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs are just as good at providing arguments in favor of a given point as they are for the counterarguments.
“LLMs do not care about which side of an argument they are on they are just as good at providing arguments in favor of a given point as they are for the counterarguments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLLMs can serve both as assistants for micro tasks and as tutors for coding.
“LLMs can serve both as assistants for micro tasks and as tutors for coding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningLLMs are quite useful in brainstorming ideas and examples related to a defined theme.
“Since LLMs are trained on a vast amount of data that represents a cross-section of all human knowledge, they are quite useful in brainstorming (or, perhaps more aptly, net -storming) ideas and examples related to a dened theme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningCurrent LLMs can produce text in a style that sounds highly authoritative even when they hallucinate.
“Current LLMs can product text in a style that sounds highly authoritative even when they hallucinate, i.e., when the content is completely wrong.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe results generated by an LLM change depending on the prompt; even small changes in prompts can lead to completely different outputs.
“Furthermore, note that the results generated by an LLM change depending on the prompt even small changes in prompts, such as dierent spacing or punctuation, can lead to completely dierent outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs can come up with catchy headlines or paper titles.
“Another useful application is to come up with catchy headlines or paper titles”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenOnce references are found and verified not hallucinated, LLMs are very capable of formatting them in the desired manner.
“Once references are found and it is veried that they are not hallucinated, LLMs are very capable of formatting them in the desired manner”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLLMs are frequently able to provide standard references that are frequently cited in the literature, but all references they provide should always be double-checked.
“They are frequently able to provide standard references that are frequently cited in the literature, but even so, all references they provide should always be double-checked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs are increasingly useful for ideation, i.e., generating, selecting, and developing ideas.
“One part of research for which LLMs are increasingly useful is the process of ideation, i.e., generating, selecting, and developing ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataLLMs can generate tweets that summarize a text.
“The following exercise is similar but converts the abstract I pasted into ve tweetable chunks that would work well for Twitter”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLLMs can edit text for grammatical or spelling mistakes, style, clarity, or simplicity.
“LLMs can edit text for grammatical or spelling mistakes, style, clarity, or simplicity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLLMs can write text in LaTeX format and draft beamer slides in LaTeX code based on bullet points.
“Of perhaps greater relevance for our daily writing, LLMs can also write text in LaTeX format, which automatically surrounds variables by the $ signs required for LaTeX, and it can draft beamer slides in LaTeX code based on bullet points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe system is highly useful for catching typos and violations of basic syntax.
“As illustrated, here, the system is highly useful for catching typos and violations of basic syntax.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe remainder of the derivations in the first mathematical example is largely gibberish.
“The remainder of the derivations is largely gibberish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mathematical abilities of the system are still quite limited: after obtaining the correct solution, when the sign mistake in the Lagrangian was corrected and the remainder of the derivations regenerated, the system produced gibberish.
“However, the mathematical abilities of the system are still quite limited: after obtaining the correct solution, I corrected the sign mistake in the Lagrangian and attempted to regenerate the remainder of the derivations, but the system produced gibberish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe system derives two of the three first-order conditions correctly but stumbles on the derivative of the iso-elastic utility function.
“It derives two of the three rst-order conditions correctly as if the sign on the budget constraint in the Lagrangian had just been a typo but stumbles on the derivative of the iso-elastic utility function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe system proceeded to correctly derive the solution of the maximization problem, i.e., the optimal levels of x and y as a function of the exogenous parameters.
“The system proceeded to correctly deriving the solution of the maximization problem, i.e., the optimal levels of x and y as a function of the exogenous parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the Lagrangian, the system includes the budget constraint with an unusual sign.
“In the Lagrangian, the system includes the budget constraint with an unusual sign.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLLMs have become useful research tools for tasks ranging from ideation, writing and background research to data analysis, coding, and mathematical derivations.
“LLMs have become useful research tools for tasks ranging from ideation, writing and background research to data analysis, coding, and mathematical derivations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe ability of LLMs to perform mathematical derivations is emerging but still limited at this point.
“The ability of LLMs to perform mathematical derivations is emerging but still limited at this point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe LLM correctly fills in a suitable budget constraint and sets up the associated maximization problem.
“It can be seen that the LLM correctly lls in a suitable budget constraint and sets up the associated maximization problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Python code to calculate the Fibonacci numbers def Fibonacci(n): if n<0: print("Incorrect input") # First Fibonacci number is 0 elif n==1: return 0 # Second Fibonacci number is 1 elif n==2: return 1 else: return Fibonacci(n-1)+Fibonacci(n-2) # Driver Program print(Fibonacci(9))LLMs can act as tutors that help users to find the packages and functions that they need for specific use cases.
“Moreover, they can act as tutors that help users to nd the packages and functions that they need for specic use cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenCurrent LLMs are quite reliable in translating short pieces of code across most common languages.
“Current LLMs are quite reliable in translating short pieces of code in this fashion across most common languages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLLMs can format data, extract data from plain text, classify and score text, extract sentiment, and even simulate human test subjects.
“LLMs can format data, extract data from plain text, classify and score text, extract sentiment, and even simulate human test subjects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThese LLM capabilities can be accessed not only through a web interface but also via an API that allows large amounts of data to be formatted, extracted, classified, etc.
“Moreover, what is perhaps most useful is that these capabilities can be accessed not only through a web interface, like what is shown in the demonstrations below, but also via an API (Application Programming Interface) that allows large amounts of data to be formatted, extracted, classied etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe system's assessment of whether the December 2022 FOMC statement is hawkish or dovish is correct and well-argued.
“The system's assessment is correct and well-argued.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataLLMs can explain what a given piece of code does in plain English.
“LLMs can also do the reverse and explain what a given piece of code does in plain English, akin to a tutor:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFor longer sequences of code translation, human assistance is still required.
“For longer sequences, human assistance is still required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSummaries of longer texts are limited by the transformer technology on which the systems are based.
“Summaries of longer texts are limited by the transformer technology on which the systems are based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs increasingly have comparative advantage in generating content; humans currently have comparative advantage in evaluating and discriminating content.
“LLMs increasingly have comparative advantage in generating content; humans currently have comparative advantage in evaluating and discriminating content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs are a category of foundation models, which can be regarded as the new paradigm in artificial intelligence of the 2020s.
“LLMs are a category of foundation models, which can be regarded as the new paradigm in articial intelligence of the 2020s (Bommasani et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bommasani et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe paper's own exploration attempted to refrain from cherry-picking and illustrate both capabilities and failures to provide a balanced version of LLM capabilities as of early 2023.
“I have attempted to refrain from cherry-picking and illustrate both the capabilities and failures of the LLMs I explored to provide a balanced version of their capabilities as of early 2023.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLLMs are useful for micro tasks because of their high speed and low transaction cost.
“LLMs are useful for such tasks because of their high speed and the low transaction cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOnce a certain threshold of training compute is crossed, LLMs almost predictably develop the ability to perform arithmetic computations, to unscramble words, or to perform Q&A.
“For example, Wei et al. (2022a) report that once a certain threshold of training compute is crossed, LLMs almost predictably develop the ability to perform arithmetic computations, to unscramble words, or to perform Q&A.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wei et al. (2022a)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationLLMs have crossed the threshold to become useful across a wide range of cognitive tasks.
“LLMs have just crossed the threshold to become useful across a wide range of cognitive tasks as was illustrated by the viral reception of ChatGPT”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOther significant capabilities that have emerged from language models include coding, translation, and rhyming.
“Other signicant capabilities that have emerged from language models include coding, translation, and rhyming.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMany LLMs actually exhibit greater capabilities than what is known (capabilities overhang).
“This suggests that there may in fact be signicant capabilities overhang, i.e., that many LLMs actually exhibit greater capabilities than what is known.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEconomic researchers who take advantage of LLMs to automate micro tasks will become significantly more productive.
“I hypothesize that ongoing advances will improve the performance of LLMs across all of these domains, and that economic researchers who take advantage of LLMs to automate micro tasks will become significantly more productive.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“I posit that researchers can signicantly increase their productivity by incorporating LLMs into their workow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn human-written texts, there is a strong correlation between authoritative style and insightful content, but LLMs have learned the former without being reliable on the latter.
“In human-written texts, there is a strong correlation between authoritative style and insightful content, but LLMs have learned the former without being reliable on the latter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs are advancing rapidly, becoming more accurate and powerful with every new iteration.
“Moreover, whereas the level of human intelligence is relatively static, LLMs are advancing rapidly, becoming more accurate and powerful with every new iteration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAt present, LLMs are most useful as assistants that can automate small micro tasks that researchers engage in numerous times during the day but that are too small to be assigned to human research assistants.
“At present, I view LLMs to be most useful as assistants that can automate small micro tasks that researchers engage in numerous times during the day but that are too small to be assigned to human research assistants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs are useful as tutors in coding and data analysis tasks as well as in ideation and writing.
“Moreover, LLMs are also useful as tutors in coding and data analysis tasks as well as in ideation and writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChatGPT has a tested IQ of 147 (99.9th percentile) on a verbal-linguistic IQ test.
“However, a former Chairman for Mensa International reports that ChatGPT has a tested IQ of 147 (99.9th percentile) on a verbal-linguistic IQ test (Thompson, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thompson, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenTo maximize reproducibility, setting the Temperature parameter of the model to 0 makes the responses provided by the system deterministic.
“To maximize reproducibility, I set the Temperature parameter of the model to 0, which makes the responses provided by the system deterministic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLarge language models such as ChatGPT have the potential to revolutionize research in economics and other disciplines.
“Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have the potential to revolutionize research in economics and other disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLLMs have super-human capabilities in processing large amounts of text.
“LLMs also have super-human capabilities in processing large amounts of text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLLMs display a form of creativity that had long been reserved for humans.
“This is illustrates vividly how LLMs dier from earlier applications of deep learning in economics they display a form of creativity that had long been reserved for humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrieder et al. (2023) develop a dataset of graduate-level mathematical questions and conclude that ChatGPT's mathematical abilities are significantly below those of an average mathematics graduate student.
“Frieder et al. (2023) develop a dataset of graduate-level mathematical questions and conclude that ChatGPT's mathematical abilities are signicantly below those of an average mathematics graduate student”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frieder et al. (2023)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationArgyle et al. (2022) propose the use of LLMs to simulate human subjects, based on the observation that the training data of LLMs contains a large amount of information about humanity.
“Argyle et al. (2022) propose the use of LLMs to simulate human subjects, based on the observation that the training data of LLMs contains a large amount of information about humanity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Argyle et al. (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSimulated results from LLMs contain valuable information and, if used correctly, can provide useful insights about our society.
“However, they also contain valuable information.If used correctly, they can provide useful insights about our society, from which all the data used to train the LLMs ultimately originate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the longer term, a similar bitter lesson may apply to economics: with enough compute, sufficiently advanced AI systems may be able to produce and articulate superior economic models, and the cognitive work of human economists may eventually become redundant.
“Yet a similar bitter lesson may apply to economics: with enough compute, suciently advanced AI systems may be able to produce and articulate superior economic models, and the cognitive work of human economists like that of all other researchers may eventually become redundant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIn Kasparov's terminology, LLMs have entered the period of weak competition with cognitive workers, including economic researchers.
“In Kasparov's terminology, LLMs have entered the period of weak competition with cognitive workers, including economic researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kasparov (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWe are currently at the competition dot, and LLMs are garnering a lot of attention.
“We are currently at the competition dot, and LLMs are garnering a lot of attention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThere is a significant risk that simulated results from LLMs simply propagate false stereotypes, and they must hence be used with great care.
“There is a signicant risk that the simulated results simply propagate false stereotypes, and they must hence be used with great care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn the short term, cognitive automation via LLMs will allow researchers to become significantly more productive.
“In the short term, cognitive automation via LLMs will allow researchers to become signicantly more productive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHuman researchers will focus on their comparative advantage by posing the questions, suggesting directions for obtaining answers, discriminating which parts of the produced content are useful, editing, and providing feedback, akin to an advisor.
“Human researchers will focus on their comparative advantage by posing the questions, suggesting directions for obtaining answers, discriminating which parts of the produced content are useful, editing, and providing feedback, akin to an advisor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAt this point, human researchers, especially when AI-assisted, are still the best technology around for generating economic research.
“At this point, human researchers, especially when AI-assisted, are still the best technology around for generating economic research!”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn the medium term, LLM-based assistants and tutors will become increasingly useful for generating the content that makes up research papers.
“In the medium term, I anticipate that LLM-based assistants and tutors will become increasingly useful for generating the content that makes up research papers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOver time, further advances will imply that LLMs are performing their tasks better and better so that the need for humans to provide inputs, edits, and feedback will diminish.
“Over time, further advances will imply that LLMs are performing their tasks better and better so that the need for humans to provide inputs, edits, and feedback will diminish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA growing number of researchers will incorporate LLMs into their workflow.
“I expect that a growing number of researchers will incorporate LLMs into their workow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHorton (2022) showcases applications to economics, using simulated test subjects to replicate and extend upon several behavioral experiments.
“Horton (2022) showcases applications to economics, using simulated test subjects to replicate and extend upon several behavioral experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horton (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe cognitive automation ushered in by the rapid rise of LLMs poses important and urgent new research questions to economists.
“I also believe that the cognitive automation ushered in by the rapid rise of LLMs poses important and urgent new research questions to economists, of which I will brainstorm a few:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNoorbakhsh et al. (2021) show that LLMs can be fine-tuned for mathematical tasks.
“Noorbakhsh et al. (2021) show that LLMs can be ne-tuned for mathematical tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noorbakhsh et al. (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis could help to increase the overall speed of progress in economics, although it risks leaving behind those who do not take advantage of LLMs.
“This could help to increase the overall speed of progress in economics, although it risks leaving behind those who do not take advantage of LLMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationOur work will affect the concepts and representations through which future AI systems will view economic questions and, ultimately, through which they will view the world.
“Second, our work will aect the concepts and representations through which future AI systems will view economic questions and, ultimately, through which they will view the world”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEconomists have the tools to translate concepts from the social sciences and humanities, such as human objectives, into analytic concepts like preferences that are more easily accessible to machines.
“Continuing on the last question, economists have the tools to translate concepts from the social sciences and humanities, such as human objectives, into analytic concepts like preferences that are more easily accessible to machines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEconomists have experience analyzing agency and control problems and their solutions.
“And we have experience analyzing agency and control problems and their solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThere are two channels through which economists can make important contributions to AI alignment work.
“In fact, there are two channels through which economists can make important contributions to this line of work:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Current LLMs are trained mostly on text and only the occasional math paper.
“However, current LLMs are trained mostly on text and only the occasional math paper.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although LLMs can be beneficial for knowledge discovery, writing assistance, and coding support, their effective and safe use requires users to have a solid understanding of underlying mechanisms and domain knowledge.
“Although LLMs can be beneficial for knowledge discovery, writing assistance, and coding support (Cowen & Tabarrock, 2023; Korinek, 2023; Mollick & Mollick, 2023; Peng et al., 2023), their effective and safe use requires users to have a solid understanding of underlying mechanisms and domain knowledge.”
From Using ChatGPT and Other Large Language Model (LLM) Applications for Academic Paper Assignments (2023) · cites this paper as Korinek, 2023
LLMs appear capable of performing coding tasks in many of the world's most prominent languages and other rudimentary tasks typically assigned to human research assistants such as data coding or data entry.
“LLMs also appear capable of performing coding tasks in many of the world’s most prominent languages as well as other rudimentary tasks typically assigned to human research assistants such as data coding or data entry (as discussed in greater detail in SI Appendix) (56).”
From Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.
F., A. W., & Keynes, J. M. (1936) · Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2980590 · Cited by 12,563 · see citing works
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · see citing works
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676 · see citing works
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · see citing works
Computing Machinery and Intelligence
Turing, A. M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3 · Cited by 1,439 · see citing works
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm
Silver, D., Hubert, T., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Lai, M., Guez, A., Lanctot, M., Sifre, L., Kumaran, D., Graepel, T., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.01815 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.15556 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
Keynes, J. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70344-2 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
Argyle, L. P., Busby, E. C., Fulda, N., Gubler, J. R., Rytting, C., & Wingate, D. (2023) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2023.2 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT
Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R.-R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P., Chevalier, A., & Berner, J. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/075280-1205 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT
Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Chevalier, A., Griffiths, R.-R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P. C., & Berner, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.13867 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning
Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., & Villalobos, P. (2022) · 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9891914 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine
Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J.-T., Wang, X., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.08745 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins
Kasparov, G. (2017) · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Idowu, S. O., Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Baldo, M. D., & Abreu, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_301600 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Aligned with Whom? Direct and Social Goals for AI Systems
Korinek, A., & Balwit, A. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30017 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationPreparing for the (Non-Existent?) Future of WorkPreprint
Korinek, A., & JUELFS, M. E. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4147243 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationPretrained Language Models are Symbolic Mathematics Solvers too!Preprint
Noorbakhsh, K., Sulaiman, M., Sharifi, M., Roy, K., & Jamshidi, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03501 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Aligned with Whom? Direct and Social Goals for AI SystemsPreprint
Korinek, A., & Balwit, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4104003 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 610623.
- Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B. T., and Taddy, M. (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(3):53574.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content
Doshi, A., & Hauser, O. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4535536 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Can AI language models replace human participants?
Dillion, D., Tandon, N., Gu, Y., & Gray, K. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.008 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Can Generative AI improve social science?
Bail, C. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314021121 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Generative AI for economic research: use cases and implications for economists
Korinek, A. (2023) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20231736 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Self-citationMegahed, F. M., Chen, Y., Ferris, J. A., Knoth, S., & Jones‐Farmer, L. A. (2023) · Quality Engineering · doi:10.1080/08982112.2023.2206479 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
From Fiction to Fact: The Growing Role of Generative AI in Business and Finance
Chen, B., Wu, Z., & Zhao, R. (2023) · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · doi:10.1080/14765284.2023.2245279 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Shahriar, S., Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., Arshad, M., Hayawi, K., Bevara, R. V. K., Mannuru, A., & Batool, L. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14177782 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Let’s Have a Chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitations
Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.47852/bonviewaia3202939 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
A tutorial on open-source large language models for behavioral science
Hussain, Z., Binz, M., Mata, R., & Wulff, D. U. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02455-8 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Niszczota, P., & Abbas, S. (2023) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104333 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Performance and biases of large language models in public opinion simulation.
Qu, Y., & Wang, J. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03609-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The Future of Research in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven World
Kulkarni, M., Mantere, S., Vaara, E., van den Broek, E., Pachidi, S., Glaser, V. L., Gehman, J., Petriglieri, G., Lindebaum, D., Cameron, L. D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10564926231219622 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Systematic Review, Applications, and Agenda for Multidisciplinary Research
Singh, H., & Singh, A. (2023) · Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies · doi:10.1080/14765284.2023.2210482 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Agri-environmental policies from 1960 to 2022
Wuepper, D., Wiebecke, I., Meier, L., Vogelsanger, S., Bramato, S., Fürholz, A., & Finger, R. (2024) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-024-00945-8 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The impact of generative AI on information processing: Evidence from the ban of ChatGPT in Italy
Bertomeu, J., Lin, Y., Liu, Y., & Ni, Z. (2025) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101782 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Can Generative AI Improve Social Science?
Bail, C. A. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rwtzs · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Comunale, M., & Manera, A. (2024) · IMF Working Paper · doi:10.5089/9798400268588.001 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Perceptions and detection of AI use in manuscript preparation for academic journals
Chemaya, N., & Martin, D. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304807 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Scenarios for the Transition to AGI
Korinek, A., & Suh, D. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32255 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia
Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00114-w · Cited by 36 · see citing works
New Paradigm for Economic and Financial Research With Generative AI: Impact and Perspective
Zheng, X., Li, J., Lu, M., & Wang, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3334306 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Analysis of CBDC narrative by central banks using large language models
Alonso-Robisco, A., & Carbó, J. M. (2023) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104643 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Using ChatGPT and Other Large Language Model (LLM) Applications for Academic Paper Assignments
Jungherr, A. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/d84q6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Can ChatGPT reduce human financial analysts’ optimistic biases?
Li, X., Feng, H., Yang, H., & Huang, J. (2023) · Economic and Political Studies · doi:10.1080/20954816.2023.2276965 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
ChatGPT Hallucinates Non-existent Citations: Evidence from Economics
Buchanan, J., Hill, S., & Shapoval, O. (2024) · The American Economist · doi:10.1177/05694345231218454 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Milička, J., Marklová, A., VanSlambrouck, K., Pospíšilová, E., Šimsová, J., Harvan, S., & Drobil, O. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298522 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The Economic Consequences of Disrupted Generative AI AdoptionPreprint
Bertomeu, J., Lin, Y., Liu, Y., & Ni, Z. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4452670 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Luo, X., Zhang, A., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Ying, F., Lin, R., Yang, Q., Wang, J., & Huang, G. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13384 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
PersonaFlow: Designing LLM-Simulated Expert Perspectives for Enhanced Research Ideation
Liu, Y., Sharma, P., Oswal, M., Xia, H., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735789 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Writing without borders: AI and cross-cultural convergence in academic writing quality
Prakash, A., Aggarwal, S., Varghese, J. J., & Varghese, J. J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05484-6 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Central Bank Communication about Climate Change
Arseneau, D. M., Drexler, A. H., & Osada, M. (2022) · Finance and Economics Discussion Series · doi:10.17016/feds.2022.031 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
FinSentGPT: A universal financial sentiment engine?
Ardekani, A. M., Bertz, J., Bryce, C., Dowling, M., & Long, S. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103291 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Eng, P. H., & Liu, R. L. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61463-7_9 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Toward LLM-agent-based modeling of transportation systems: A conceptual framework
Liu, T., Yang, J., & Yin, Y. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence for Transportation · doi:10.1016/j.ait.2025.100001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Liang, H., Fan, J., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17093842 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
AI-Assisted Tools for Scientific Review Writing: Opportunities and Cautions
da Silva, J. J. G., Gouveia, R. P., Zielinski, K., de Oliveira, M. C. F., Amancio, D. R., Bruno, O. M., & Oliveira, O. N. (2025) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5c08837 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Large Language Models and the Wisdom of Small Crowds
Trott, S. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00144 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Generative AI: Overview, Economic Impact, and Applications in Asset ManagementPreprint
Luk, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4574814 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
ChatGPT e outras IAs transformarão a pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre seus usos
Sampaio, R. C., Nicolás, M. A., Junquilho, T. A., Silva, L. R. L., de Freitas, C. S., Telles, M., Teixeira, J. S., da Escóssia, F. M., & dos Santos, L. C. (2024) · Revista de Sociologia e Política · doi:10.1590/1678-98732432e008 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Zhao, M., Li, F., Cai, F., Chen, H., & Li, Z. (2024) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-12-2023-0115 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Can AI help with your personal finances?
Hean, O., Saha, U., & Saha, B. (2025) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2025.2450384 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Soylu, D., Liao, T., Creel, K., & Liang, P. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2961271/v1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Generation Next: Experimentation with AI
Charness, G. B., Jabarian, B., & List, J. A. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31679 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
GPT as a Financial AdvisorPreprint
Niszczota, P., & Abbas, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4384861 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) · doi:10.1109/ethics57328.2023.10154939 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: experimental evidence
Niszczota, P., & Conway, P. J. (2023) · Economics and Business Review/The Poznań University of Economics Review · doi:10.18559/ebr.2023.2.744 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A First Look at Financial Data Analysis Using ChatGPT-4o
Chou, W.-H., Feng, Z., Li, B., & Feng, L. (2025) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm18020099 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Judgments of Research Co-Created by Generative AI: Experimental EvidencePreprint
Niszczota, P., & Conway, P. J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4443934 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Song, X., Xu, L., Peng, C., Pan, S., Adibi, A., Wang, X., & Lu, Z. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2459267 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence–Powered (Finance) Scholarship
Novy‐Marx, R., & Velikov, M. (2026) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20251821 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Early ChatGPT User Portrait through the Lens of Data
Deng, Y., Zhao, N., & Huang, X. S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386415 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Automatic Product Classification in International Trade: Machine Learning and Large Language Models
de Artiñano, I. M., Depetris, F. R., & Martincus, C. V. (2023) · doi:10.18235/0005012 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Decoding market sentiment: the power of ChatGPT in explaining Bitcoin returns from X data
Nguyen, B. T., Chu, T. T., Ha, S. X., & Nguyen, A. T. (2025) · China Finance Review International · doi:10.1108/cfri-05-2024-0278 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Existential risk from transformative AI: an economic perspective
Growiec, J. (2024) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2024.21525 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22761926 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Generation Next: Experimentation with AIPreprint
Charness, G. B., Jabarian, B., & List, J. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4576689 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
AI-Empowered Human Research Integrating Brain Science and Social Sciences Insights
Xiong, F., Yu, X., & Leong, H. W. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir62538.2024.10960181 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Generation Next: Experimentation with AIPreprint
Charness, G. B., Jabarian, B., & List, J. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4574623 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
R&D Capital and the Idea Production Function
Growiec, J., McAdam, P., & Mućk, J. (2023) · The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Research Working Papers · doi:10.18651/rwp2023-05 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gingado: A Machine Learning Library Focused on Economics and FinancePreprint
de Araujo, D. K. G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4482553 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Scenarios for the Transition to AGIPreprint
Korinek, A., & Suh, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4762962 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen Small Wins Big: Classification Tasks Where Compact Models Outperform Original GPT-4Preprint
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Guez, B., Saltiel, D., & Challet, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780454 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Scenarios for the Transition to AGIPreprint
Korinek, A., & Suh, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4769834 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationA First Look at Financial Data Analysis Using ChatGPT-4oPreprint
Feng, Z., Li, B., & Liu, F. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4849578 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Prompting for Policy: Forecasting Macroeconomic Scenarios with Synthetic LLM Personas
Iadisernia, G., & Camassa, C. (2025) · ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF) · doi:10.1145/3768292.3770385 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AI in Corporate Disclosure: IR Survey Evidence, Legal Risks, and Research Opportunities
Kirk, M. P., Molk, P., & Pondel, E. (2025) · Accounting Horizons · doi:10.2308/horizons-2024-074 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sebo, P., Nie, B., & Wang, T. (2026) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.173647.2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zhou, J., & Cen, W. (2024) · Innovation & Technology Advances · doi:10.61187/ita.v2i2.124 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AI Narrative and Stock MispricingPreprint
Bandyopadhyay, A. P., Mai, D., & Pukthuanthong, K. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4418236 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gpt-3.5 Hallucinates Nonexistent Citations: Evidence from EconomicsPreprint
Buchanan, J. A., & Shapoval, O. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4472220 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis of Bloomberg Markets Wrap Using ChatGPT: Application to the NASDAQPreprint
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Saltiel, D., Guez, B., & Jacquot, T. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780150 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AI-Powered (Finance) ScholarshipPreprint
Novy‐Marx, R., & Velikov, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5060022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Code like an economist: Analyzing LLMs’ code generation capabilities in economics and finance
Song, Z., Wu, S., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2025.108540 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hou, Z., Duan, Z., Yang, M., Wu, M., & Yang, S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) · doi:10.1109/qrs65678.2025.00015 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AGI, Governments, and Free Societies
Bullock, J. B., Hammond, S., & Krier, S. (2025) · Public administration, governance and globalization · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00514-4_17 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
LLMs na Geração de Mapeamentos Semânticos: Experimento no domínio de Plantas Industriais
da Silva, G. M. H., de Armas, E. M., Faria, P. S., de Castro, R. A., Coqueiro, T. D., Lemos, M., & Castro, L. C. (2025) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Bancos de Dados (SBBD) · doi:10.5753/sbbd_estendido.2025.248169 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Gao, Y., Wu, M., & Shi, R. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02795-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sebo, P., Nie, B., & Wang, T. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.173647.1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Reconfiguring Inquiry: The Epistemic and Methodological Impacts of NLP in Higher Education Research
Gao, C. Y., Wang, X., & Yu, K. (2026) · Palgrave studies in global higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07781-3_13 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Subramanya, S., Krishnan, S., & Azad, N. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10804-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI-Driven Economic Analysis: From Data to Decisions
Jabeen, M., Jabeen, B., Aakif, Z., & Aslam, H. (2026) · International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science · doi:10.54938/ijemdss.2026.05.3.765 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pricing and data science: The tale of two accidentally parallel transitions
Wallusch, J. (2023) · Economics and Business Review/The Poznań University of Economics Review · doi:10.18559/ebr.2023.2.739 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mit Digitalisierung zu klimaneutralem Wachstum und Wohlstand
Demary, V., & Schaefer, T. (2023) · Wirtschaftsdienst · doi:10.2478/wd-2023-0132 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ortho-Heterodox Biases and the Economist Algorithms of ChatGPT
Iazdi, O. S. C. (2023) · Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought · doi:10.5209/ijhe.91545 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Synthesizing Public Opinions with LLMs: Role Creation, Impacts, and the Future of Edemorcacy
Karanjai, R., Shor, B., Austin, A., Kennedy, R., Lu, Y., Xu, L., & Shi, W. L. (2025) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg65568.2025.11081685 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
GPT-3.5 Hallucinates Nonexistent Citations: Evidence from EconomicsPreprint
Buchanan, J. A., & Shapoval, O. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4467968 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Loquacity and Visible Emotion: ChatGPT as a Policy AdvisorPreprint
Biancotti, C., & Camassa, C. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4533699 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Randomized Controlled Trials for Microsoft Copilot for SecurityPreprint
Edelman, B. G., Bono, J., Peng, S., Rodriguez, R., & Ho, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4648700 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Stress index strategy enhanced with financial news sentiment analysis for the equity marketsPreprint
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Saltiel, D., Guez, B., & Jacquot, T. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780225 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Uncertainty in Sentiment Analysis with LLMs using QCM (Quantiles of Correlation Matrices) - DistancePreprint
Lefort, B., Benhamou, E., Ohana, J., Guez, B., & Saltiel, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780192 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Benhamou, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4780220 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative AI Adoption in Human Creative Tasks: Experimental EvidencePreprint
Zou, W., & Zhu, F. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5196748 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI "Errors"Preprint
Huang, W., Menkveld, A. J., & Yu, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6408138 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22761926.v1
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4441613
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22761926.v2
Albuquerque, P. H., & Albuquerque, S. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22761926.v3
Alhamadani, A., Althubiti, K., Sarkar, S., He, J., Alkulaib, L., Behal, S., Khan, M. H., & Lu, C. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3625007.3632331
R&D Capital and the Idea Production FunctionPreprint
McAdam, P., Growiec, J., & Mućk, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4771856
- Authors
- Korinek, A.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Korinek, Anton
- ORCID
- Korinek, Anton
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2023-02
- OpenAlex
- W4320481230
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, ChatGPT, cognitive automation, economic research, research assistants, research productivity, data analysis, mathematical derivation, academic writing, background research, coding, research tutoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review