Cited by 4,698Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence

Open access
Lusardi, Annamaria, Mitchell, Olivia S.·2014·Journal of Economic Literature

Abstract

This paper undertakes an assessment of a rapidly growing body of economic research on financial literacy. We start with an overview of theoretical research, which casts financial knowledge as a form of investment in human capital. Endogenizing financial knowledge has important implications for welfare, as well as policies intended to enhance levels of financial knowledge in the larger population. Next, we draw on recent surveys to establish how much (or how little) people know and identify the least financially savvy population subgroups. This is followed by an examination of the impact of financial literacy on economic decision making in the United States and elsewhere. While the literature is still young, conclusions may be drawn about the effects and consequences of financial illiteracy and what works to remedy these gaps. A final section offers thoughts on what remains to be learned if researchers are to better inform theoretical and empirical models as well as public policy. (JEL A20, D14, G11, I20, J26)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jel.52.1.5

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 205 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Agnew Julie R, 2007, Boston College Center for Retirement Research Working Paper, 2007
  2. Arrondel Luc, 2012, International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies 4 (2).
  3. Becker, Gary S. 1975. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Second edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. Benítez-Silva Hugo A, 2009, University of Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper, 2009
  5. Blanton Kimberly, 2012, Center for Retirement Research Brief, 12
  6. 10.1162/rest.90.2.253 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chen Haiyang, 2002, Financial Services Review, 11, 289
  8. Deevy, Martha, Shoshana Lucich, and Michaela Beals. 2012. "Scams, Schemes and Swindles: A Review of Consumer Financial Fraud Research." Stanford University Center on Longevity Financial Fraud Research Center.
  9. Delavande Adeline, 2008, University of Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper, 2008
  10. 10.1257/002205102320161258 · DOI
  11. Hilgert Marianne A, 2003, Federal Reserve Bulletin, 89, 309
  12. Hirad, Abdighani, and Peter Zorn. 2002. "Prepurchase Homeownership Counseling: A Little Knowledge Is a Good Thing." In Low-Income Homeownership: Examining the Unexamined Goal, edited by Nicolas P. Retsinas and Eric S. Belsky, 146-174. Cambridge, Mass.: Joint Center for Housing Studies; Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  13. Kast Felipe, 2012, Harvard Business School Working Paper, 12
  14. Li Geng, 2009, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finance and Economics Discussion Paper, 2009
  15. Lusardi Annamaria, 2011, Wharton School Pension Research Council Working Paper, 2011
  16. Mitchell, Olivia S., John Piggott, and Noriyuki Takayama, eds. 2011. Security Lifelong Retirement Income: Global Annuity Markets and Policy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Venti Steven F, 1998, American Economic Review, 88, 185
  18. Way Wendy L, 2009, Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20, 64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Literature
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
5-44
ISSN
  • 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-8175
OpenAlex
W3125685058
Cited by
4,698
References
205
Citations by year
2026: 862 · 2025: 761 · 2024: 572 · 2023: 434 · 2022: 363 · 2021: 380 · 2020: 339 · 2019: 284 · 2018: 216 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 51
FWCI
656.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, financial knowledge, human capital, financial illiteracy, economic decision-making, financial education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review