Cited by 235Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Financial Literacy and Economic Outcomes: Evidence and Policy Implications

Open access
Mitchell, Olivia S., Lusardi, Annamaria·2015·The Journal of Retirement

Abstract

This paper reviews what we have learned over the past decade about financial literacy and its relationship to financial decision-making around the world. Using three questions, we have surveyed people in several countries to determine whether they have the fundamental knowledge of economics and finance needed to function as effective decision-makers. We find that levels of financial literacy are low not only in the United States. but also in many other countries including those with well-developed financial markets. Moreover, financial illiteracy is particularly acute for some demographic groups, especially women and the less-educated. These findings are important since financial literacy is linked to borrowing, saving, and spending patterns. We also offer new evidence on financial literacy among high school students drawing on the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment implemented in 18 countries. Last, we discuss the implications of this research for policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3905/jor.2015.3.1.107

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Netherlands, knowing the right answer to one additional financial literacy question is associated with a 10 percentage point higher probability of planning.

    “Financial literacy is found to have the strongest impact in the Netherlands, where knowing the right answer to one additional financial literacy question is associated with a 10 percentage point higher probability of planning (Mitchell and Lusardi, 2015).”

    From Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications (2019) · cites this paper as Mitchell and Lusardi, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Behrman Jere Mitchell Olivia S Soo Cindy Bravo David 2012 Financial Literacy, Schooling, and Wealth Accumulation American Economic Review, P&P 102 3 300 304 PMC3554245 23355747
  2. Collins J Michael O’Rourke CM 2010 Financial Education and Counseling: Still Holding Promise Journal of Consumer Affairs 44 483 498
  3. Lusardi Annamaria Mitchell Olivia S 2011a Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing Financial Literacy: Implications for Retirement Security and the Financial Marketplace Mitchell OS Lusardi A Oxford Oxford University Press 17 39
  4. Mitchell Olivia S Lusardi Annamaria 2011 Financial Literacy: Implications for Retirement Security and the Financial Marketplace Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, O. S., & Lusardi, A.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Lusardi, Annamaria
Venue
The Journal of Retirement
Published
2015-06-30
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
107-114
ISSN
  • 2326-6899 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-6902
OpenAlex
W3122426078
Cited by
235
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
FWCI
42.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Retirement (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, financial decision-making, financial illiteracy, economic knowledge, gender differences, educational attainment, household borrowing, saving and spending, high school students, PISA, financial education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review