Cited by 3,554Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

Financial literacy and stock market participation

Open access
van Rooij, Maarten, Lusardi, Annamaria, Alessie, Rob·2011·Journal of Financial Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The more financially literate are more likely to invest in the stock market and earn higher risk-adjusted returns on their investments.

    “the more financially literate are more likely to invest in the stock market, and hence, earn higher (risk-adjusted) returns on their investments (van Rooij, Lusardi, and Alessi 2011;Clark, Lusardi, and Mitchell 2017).”

    From The Importance of Financial Literacy: Opening a New Field (2023) · cites this paper as van Rooij, Lusardi, and Alessi 2011

    Section 5 (p. 18) finds that people with higher financial literacy are more likely to participate in the stock market. The paper does not establish that they consequently earn higher risk-adjusted investment returns; its discussion of successful investing in Section 5 (p. 19) presents a hypothetical explanation, not a measured finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The percentage of correct answers doubled in van Rooij et al. (2011b) when the wording for the third Big Three question was 'buying company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund' as compared to phrasing the question reversely.

    “In fact, the percentage of correct answers doubled in the latter study when the wording for the third question of the Big Three was ''buying company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund'' as compared to phrasing the question reversely”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as van Rooij et al. (2011b)

    Box 2, p. 13, says the number of correct answers doubled for the quoted wording compared with its reverse. Box 2, pp. 12–13, presents this as an advanced financial-literacy question, not as the third question of the “Big Three”; that identification is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Answers of survey participants differ significantly based on the wording of the test questions.

    “Specifically, Lusardi and Mitchell (2011a, b) and van Rooij et al. (2011b) document that the answers of survey participants differ significantly based on the wording of the test questions.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as van Rooij et al. (2011b)

  • Both self-assessed and objectively measured financial literacy predict individuals' propensity to hold stocks.

    “Likewise, van Rooij et al. (2011b) find that both self-assessed and objectively measured financial literacy predict individuals' propensity to hold stocks.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as van Rooij et al. (2011b)

  • Van Rooij et al. (2011b) document a positive relationship between stock market participation and financial literacy.

    “van Rooij et al. (2011b) who document a positive relationship between stock market participation and financial literacy”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as van Rooij et al. (2011b)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bernheim, D., 1995. Do households appreciate their financial vulnerabilities? An analysis of actions, perceptions, and public policy. In: Tax Policy and Economic Growth, American Council for Capital Formation, Washington, DC, pp. 1–30.
  2. Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., Linnainmaa, J., IQ and stock market participation. Journal of Finance, in press, http://www.afajof.org/afa/forthcoming/7875p.pdf.
  3. Hilgert, 2002, Financial knowledge, experience and learning preferences: preliminary results from a new survey on financial literacy, Consumer Interests Annual, 48, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Lusardi, Annamaria
Venue
Journal of Financial Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
449-472
ISSN
0304-405X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121918578
Cited by
3,554
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 288 · 2025: 324 · 2024: 366 · 2023: 316 · 2022: 300 · 2021: 291 · 2020: 275 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 180 · 2016: 142 · 2015: 166 · 2014: 136 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 91
FWCI
88.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
financial literacy, stock market participation, household investment, financial numeracy, interest rates, financial instruments, bonds, mutual funds, risk diversification, survey question wording, retirement savings, financial decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review