The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field
Abstract
Environmental quality in many developing countries is poor and generates substantial health and productivity costs. However, the few existing measures of marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for environmental quality improvements indicate low valuations by affected households. This paper argues that this seeming paradox is the central puzzle at the intersection of environmental and development economics: Given poor environmental quality and high health burdens in developing countries, why is MWTP seemingly so low? We develop a conceptual framework for understanding this puzzle and propose four potential explanations for why environmental quality is so poor: (1) due to low income levels, individuals value increases in income more than marginal improvements in environmental quality; (2) the marginal costs of environmental quality improvements are high; (3) political economy factors undermine efficient policymaking; and (4) market failures such as weak property rights and missing capital markets distort MWTP for environmental quality. We review the literature on each explanation and discuss how the framework applies to climate change, which is perhaps the most important issue at the intersection of environment and development economics. The paper concludes with a list of promising and unanswered research questions for the emerging sub-field of “envirodevonomics.” (JEL I15, O10, O44, Q50)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.612 · Cited by 10,902
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Kuznets, S. (2024) · Business Cycle Theory, Part I Volume 4 · doi:10.4324/9781003549741-8 · Cited by 7,176
Collective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195
Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India*
Hsieh, C.-T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403 · Cited by 4,175
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Stern, D. I. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 4,013
The Environment and Directed Technical Change
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.131 · Cited by 3,734
Estimating the Value of Political Connections
Fisman, R. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.4.1095 · Cited by 2,968
The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174312 · Cited by 2,637
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenstone, M., & Jack, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2015-03-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-42
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057028847
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 150
- FWCI
- 46.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jel.53.1.5
- The paper
- Greenstone, M., & Jack, B. K. (2015). Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.1.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.