The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Fairness
Abstract
Concerns that algorithms may discriminate against certain groups have led to numerous efforts to ‘blind’ the algorithm to race. We argue that this intuitive perspective is misleading and may do harm. Our primary result is exceedingly simple, yet often overlooked. A preference for fairness should not change the choice of estimator. Equity preferences can change how the estimated prediction function is used (e.g., different threshold for different groups) but the function itself should not change. We show in an empirical example for college admissions that the inclusion of variables such as race can increase both equity and efficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, it may be difficult to determine which types of fairness are most appropriate for a given context and how to balance them appropriately [4][5][6].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Currently, combinations of these ideals using established deinitions have been shown to be mathematically intractable [27,69,177].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
In the citing paper
“Both omission and immunity overlook relationships with proxy variables (as discussed in subsection 2.1, we note [291] as an exception here who omit proxies), which can result in increasing bias and discrimination [177], or indirectly concealing discrimination [88].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
In the citing paper
“Both omission and immunity overlook relationships with proxy variables (as discussed in subsection 2.1, we note [291] as an exception here who omit proxies), which can result in increasing bias and discrimination [177], or indirectly concealing discrimination [88].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
In the citing paper
“Sadly, we cannot combine both [69,177].”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
Citations
Cites
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Kuznets, S. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003549741-8 · Cited by 7,177
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Human Decisions and Machine Predictions
Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx032 · Cited by 1,040
Self-citationKleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.p20151023 · Cited by 584
Self-citationProceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
(2012) · doi:10.1145/2090236 · Cited by 140
Fryer, R. G., & Loury, G. C. (2013) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/671180 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Selbst Andrew D., 2016, California Law Review, 104, 671
- Mullainathan Sendhil, 2017, Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Innovation in Theoretical Computer Science, 43, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 279
The Cost of Ethical AI Development for AI Startups
Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., & Seamans, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534195 · Cited by 29
Angelucci, A., Li, Z., Stoimenova, N., & Canali, S. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01562-4 · Cited by 22
Effective sample size: A measure of individual uncertainty in predictions
Thomassen, D., le Cessie, S., van Houwelingen, H. V., & Steyerberg, E. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10018 · Cited by 22
‘Channel shift’: Technologically mediated policing and procedural justice
Wells, H., Aston, E., Bradford, B., O’Neill, M., Clayton, E., & Andrews, W. (2022) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557221132962 · Cited by 17
CIRCLe: Color Invariant Representation Learning for Unbiased Classification of Skin Lesions
Pakzad, A., Abhishek, K., & Hamarneh, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25069-9_14 · Cited by 21
Exposed or Erased: Algorithmic Censorship of Nudity in Art
Riccio, P., Hofmann, T., & Oliver, N. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642586 · Cited by 18
Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning
Londoño, L., Hurtado, J. V., Hertz, N., Kellmeyer, P., Vöeneky, S., & Valada, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3403898 · Cited by 43
Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting
Leppänen, L., Tuulonen, H., & Sirén‐Heikel, S. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i3.3022 · Cited by 19
Breaking Taboos in Fair Machine Learning: An Experimental Study
Nyarko, J., Goel, S., & Sommers, R. (2021) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3465416.3483291 · Cited by 15
Algorithmic Design: Fairness Versus Accuracy
Liang, A., Lu, J., & Mu, X. (2021) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) · doi:10.1145/3490486.3538237 · Cited by 19
Non-monetary coordination mechanisms for time slot allocation in warehouse delivery
Karaenke, P., Bichler, M., Merting, S., & Minner, S. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.068 · Cited by 15
Santos, J., Bittencourt, I. I., Reis, M., Challco, G. C., & Isotani, S. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01220-6 · Cited by 13
Esthappan, S. (2024) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spae060 · Cited by 13
A LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FAIRNESS REPORTING
Yap, J. Q., & Lim, E. W. K. (2022) · The Cambridge Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s0008197322000460 · Cited by 20
Doval, L., & Smolin, A. (2024) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/729067 · Cited by 14
When Politicization Stops Algorithms in Criminal Justice
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2020) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa099 · Cited by 15
Business Data Ethics: Emerging Trends in the Governance of Advanced Analytics and AIPreprint
Hirsch, D. D., Bartley, T., Chandrasekaran, A., Norris, D., Parthasarathy, S., & Turner, P. N. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3828239 · Cited by 15
Liberatore, F., Camacho‐Collados, M., & Quijano-Sánchez, L. (2021) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-021-09512-x · Cited by 13
Lamba, H., Rodolfa, K. T., & Ghani, R. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468518 · Cited by 14
Algorithmic Discrimination in ServicePreprint
Ukanwa, K., & Rust, R. T. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3654943 · Cited by 12
Algorithmic Fairness in Mortgage Lending: From Absolute Conditions to Relational Trade-OffsPreprint
Lee, M. S. A., & Floridi, L. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3559407 · Cited by 13
On prediction-modelers and decision-makers: why fairness requires more than a fair prediction model
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01886-3 · Cited by 18
Strategies to improve fairness in artificial intelligence:A systematic literature review
Trigo, A., Stein, N., & Belfo, F. P. (2024) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-240045 · Cited by 12
Biasio, A. D., Monaro, M., Oneto, L., Ballan, L., & Navarin, N. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110699 · Cited by 12
Hernández, A. D., & Owen, R. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2331655 · Cited by 11
Applying Fairness Constraints on Graph Node Ranks Under Personalization Bias
Krasanakis, E., Papadopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. Y. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65351-4_49 · Cited by 11
Algorithmic fairness and resentment
Babic, B., & King, Z. J. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02006-5 · Cited by 10
Yu, S. (2023) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/3616961.3616965 · Cited by 16
Fair Models for Impartial Policies: Controlling Algorithmic Bias in Transport Behavioural Modelling
Vega-Gonzalo, M., & Christidis, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148416 · Cited by 11
Lee, H., Kizilcec, R. F., & Joachims, T. (2023) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3573051.3593382 · Cited by 10
Tomaino, G., Abdulhalim, H., Kireyev, P., & Wertenbroch, K. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3683754 · Cited by 12
Using Machine Learning to Create an Early Warning System for Welfare Recipients*
Sansone, D., & Zhu, A. (2023) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/obes.12550 · Cited by 13
Can an AI Algorithm Mitigate Racial Economic Inequality? An Analysis in the Context of AirbnbPreprint
Zhang, S.-Y., Mehta, N., Singh, P. V., & Srinivasan, K. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3770371 · Cited by 16
Skin Tone Penalties: Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Colorism in FootballPreprint
Kamel, D., & Woo-Mora, L. G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4537612 · Cited by 11
Purificato, E., Boratto, L., & Luca, E. W. D. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09685-x · Cited by 10
Provable Detection of Propagating Sampling Bias in Prediction Models
Ravishankar, P., Mo, Q., McFowland, E., & Neill, D. B. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i8.26144 · Cited by 8
Fairness in Contextual Resource Allocation Systems: Metrics and Incompatibility Results
Jo, N., Tang, B., Dullerud, K., Aghaei, S., Rice, E. R. W., & Vayanos, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i10.26397 · Cited by 9
Meursault, V., Moulton, D., Santucci, L., & Schor, N. (2022) · Working paper · doi:10.21799/frbp.wp.2022.39 · Cited by 8
Gupta, S. S., Lee, S., De‐Arteaga, M., & Lease, M. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583290 · Cited by 10
Fair Incentives for Repeated Engagement
Freund, D., & Hssaine, C. (2024) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478241273874 · Cited by 7
Weighted Noise: Discretion in Regulation
Agarwal, S. D., Morais, B., Seru, A., & Shue, K. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32344 · Cited by 7
Bridging BioSciences and technology: The impact of AI & GenAI in life sciences and agribusiness
da Cunha, N. B., Fernandes, F. C., Gil-Ley, A., Franco, O. L., Timakondu, N., & Costa, F. F. (2025) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2025.149623 · Cited by 7
Human–Algorithmic Bias: Source, Evolution, and Impact
Hu, X., Huang, Y. H., Li, B., & Lu, T. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03862 · Cited by 6
Davidson, T. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02360-w · Cited by 7
Human-Centered AI Goals for Speech Therapy Tools
Deka, C., Shrivastava, A., Nautiyal, S., & Chauhan, P. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49368-3_8 · Cited by 6
Structural Interventions and the Dynamics of Inequality
Zhang, A., & Hosoi, A. E. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658952 · Cited by 9
Developments in Multi-Agent Fair Allocation
Aziz, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7082 · Cited by 6
Can text messages reduce incarceration in rural and vulnerable populations?
Owens, E. G., & Sloan, C. (2023) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22505 · Cited by 6
Robustness of Fairness: An Experimental Analysis
Kamp, S., Zhao, A. L. L., & Kutty, S. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_43 · Cited by 6
Group decision making under uncertain preferences: powered by AI, empowered by AI
Xia, L. (2022) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14734 · Cited by 5
Oteng, P. A., Lartey, V. C., & Amofa, A. K. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231196658 · Cited by 5
Mitigating Algorithmic Bias with Limited Annotations
Wang, G., Du, M., Liu, N., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43415-0_15 · Cited by 5
Ahn, E., Tejeda, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.13114 · Cited by 5
Trust Building and Credit Reporting with Big Data in the Digital Age
Peng, W., & Zhu, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65117-6_29 · Cited by 5
SLIDE: A surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistency
Kim, K., Ohn, I., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.027 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence ante portas: Reactions of Law
Weber, R. H. (2021) · J — Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal · doi:10.3390/j4030037 · Cited by 5
Adomavicius, G., & Yang, M. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3446944 · Cited by 3
Ethics and AI StartupsPreprint
Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., Reichensperger, L., & Seamans, R. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3895939 · Cited by 5
Does the Gig Economy Discriminate against Women? Evidence from Physicians in ChinaPreprint
Chen, Y. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4081483 · Cited by 5
A Classification of Feedback Loops and Their Relation to Biases in Automated Decision-Making Systems
Pagan, N., Baumann, J., Elokda, E., De Pasquale, G., Bolognani, S., & Hannák, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06055 · Cited by 4
Wei, Z., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Kulkarni, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107585 · Cited by 4
Complementarities between algorithmic and human decision-making: The case of antibiotic prescribing
Ribers, M. A., & Ullrich, H. (2024) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-024-09284-1 · Cited by 5
FairPlay: A Collaborative Approach to Mitigate Bias in Datasets for Improved AI Fairness
Behzad, T., Singh, M. K., Ripa, A. J., & Mueller, K. D. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710982 · Cited by 4
Evaluating the Prediction Bias Induced by Label Imbalance in Multi-label Classification
Piras, L., Boratto, L., & Ramos, G. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482100 · Cited by 4
Justice, inclusion, and incentives
Demeze-Jouatsa, G. H., Pongou, R., & Tondji, J. (2024) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/09516298241233491 · Cited by 4
Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System
Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29267 · Cited by 4
Self-citationFair or Unbiased Algorithmic Decision-Making? A Review of the Literature on Digital MarketsPreprint
Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Jean, C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3943389 · Cited by 4
Human-Algorithmic Bias: Source, Evolution, and ImpactPreprint
Hu, X., Huang, Y. H., Li, B., & Lu, T. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4195014 · Cited by 4
Causes and Consequences of Perceived Workplace DiscriminationPreprint
Ruebeck, H. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4799864 · Cited by 5
Johnson, D. K. N. (2025) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1177/00346446251331615 · Cited by 3
Domain-Constrained Stacking Framework for Credit Default Prediction
Ding, M.-L., Ma, Y., & You, F. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13213451 · Cited by 3
What Happens When Platforms Mediate the Audience–Journalism Relationship?
Seuri, O., Ikäheimo, H.-P., & Huhtamäki, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95073-6_15 · Cited by 3
Discrimination for the Sake of Fairness: Fairness by Design and Its Legal Framework
Hoch, H., Hertweck, C., Loi, M., & Tamò‐Larrieux, A. (2021) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105916 · Cited by 5
Fair-mod: Fair Modular Community Detection
Panayiotou, G., & Magnani, M. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82435-7_8 · Cited by 3
An Open Source Replication of a Winning Recidivism Prediction Model
Circo, G. M., & Wheeler, A. P. (2022) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x221133004 · Cited by 3
Purificato, E., & Luca, E. W. D. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37249-0_14 · Cited by 6
FAIRO: Fairness-aware Sequential Decision Making for Human-in-the-Loop CPS
Zhao, T., Taherisadr, M., & Elmalaki, S. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS) · doi:10.1109/iccps61052.2024.00015 · Cited by 3
Online Combinatorial Optimization with Group Fairness Constraints
Golrezaei, N., Niazadeh, R., Patel, K. K., & Susan, F. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/44 · Cited by 3
The Feedback Loop of Statistical Discrimination
Baek, J., & Makhdoumi, A. (2025) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3757887.3767688 · Cited by 3
Towards fair machine learning using combinatorial methods
Saraswat, A., Pal, M., Pokhriyal, S., & Abhishek, K. (2022) · Evolutionary Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s12065-022-00702-5 · Cited by 4
Anti-discrimination Laws, AI, and Gender Bias: A Case Study in Non-mortgage Fintech LendingPreprint
Kelley, S., Ovchinnikov, A. S., Hardoon, D. R., & Heinrich, A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3719577 · Cited by 3
Diagnosing Gender Bias in Image Recognition SystemsPreprint
Schwemmer, C., Knight, C. R., Bello-Pardo, E. D., Oklobdzija, S. N., Schoonvelde, M., & Lockhart, J. W. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/as25q · Cited by 3
Buyer-Optimal Algorithmic ConsumptionPreprint
Ichihashi, S., & Smolin, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4579186 · Cited by 3
Sumpter, L., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2024) · Journal of Humanistic Mathematics · doi:10.5642/jhummath.kjeo2817 · Cited by 2
Finding representative group fairness metrics using correlation estimations
Anahideh, H., Nezami, N., & Asudeh, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125652 · Cited by 3
Li, H., Xing, W., Zhu, W., Zhang, S., & Liu, Z. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09467-z · Cited by 3
A theoretical model of AI bias mitigation: incentives, regulation and equilibrium
Bera, S., & Bera, I. (2025) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-06-2025-0138 · Cited by 2
Thomassen, D., Hackmann, T., Goeman, J., Steyerberg, E., & le Cessie, S. (2025) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.100911 · Cited by 7
L q regularization for fair artificial intelligence robust to covariate shift
Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, K., & Kim, Y. (2023) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11616 · Cited by 2
Fairness of linear regression in decision making
Cohen-Addad, V., Gavva, S. T., Karthik, C. S., Mathieu, C., & Namrata, N. (2023) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-023-00423-7 · Cited by 2
Measuring and Mitigating Group Inequalities In Resource Allocation
Farahi, A., Ting, A., & Ma, Y. (2023) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3632122 · Cited by 2
Fair Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines for Ensuring Equity and Transparency
Haghighat, P., Gándara, D., Kang, L., & Anahideh, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30211 · Cited by 5
GI-Graph: A Generative Invariant Graph Learning Scheme Towards Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Zhang, S., Liu, X., Qi, Z., Yan, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3592640 · Cited by 2
Learning fair prediction models with an imputed sensitive variable: Empirical studies
Kim, Y., & Jeong, H. (2022) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.29220/csam.2022.29.2.251 · Cited by 3
Rewarding Numbers: Quantification Premia and Evaluative Convergence
Mueller-Gastell, K. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221103052 · Cited by 2
Inferring Trade-Offs in University Admissions: Evidence from Cambridge
Bhattacharya, D., & Shvets, J. (2024) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/730544 · Cited by 3
The Terminator of Social Welfare? The Economic Consequences of Algorithmic DiscriminationPreprint
Bauer, K., Pfeuffer, N., Abdel-Karim, B. M., Hinz, O. F., & Kosfeld, M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3675313 · Cited by 3
Notions of Fairness in Automated Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Open Issues
Yousefi, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12673-4_1 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Injustice in Algorithmic Systems and the Limits of Civil Rights Law
Wood, A., & Edenberg, E. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732213 · Cited by 2
Is Fair Advertising Good for Platforms?
Yuan, D., Aseri, M., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2025) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2023.0201 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Rambachan, A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- AEA Papers and Proceedings
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2018-05-01
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 22-27
- ISSN
- 2574-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 2574-0776
- OpenAlex
- W4248633940
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 41.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AEA Papers and Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic discrimination, race, equity-efficiency trade-off, university admission, prediction function, thresholding, estimator selection, equity preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
