The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context
Abstract
Objective: To develop a framework that researchers and other knowledge disseminators who are embarking on knowledge translation can use to increase their familiarity with the intended user groups. Methods: The framework was derived from a review and analysis of the knowledge translation literature and from the authors' own experience with a variety of user groups. Results: The framework consists of five domains: the user group, the issue, the research, the knowledge translation relationship, and dissemination strategies. Within each domain, the framework includes a series of questions. The questions provide the researcher with a way of organizing what he or she already knows about the user group and the knowledge translation project, of identifying what still is unknown, and of flagging what is important to learn. Conclusions: Most researchers wishing to engage in knowledge translation are moving out of their own familiar contexts. By using this framework, researchers will learn about the new contexts in which they find themselves. The insights they gain will increase their familiarity with the user group, thus aiding in the implicit goal of the interactive model of knowledge translation: making the researcher a part of the user group context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tsai, W. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069443 · Cited by 4,257
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/3109916 · Cited by 2,222
The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization
Caplan, N. (1979) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276427902200308 · Cited by 844
The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings
Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392533 · Cited by 683
Truth Tests and Utility Tests: Decision-Makers' Frames of Reference for Social Science Research
Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095127 · Cited by 314
Linkage between Researchers and Practitioners: A Qualitative Study
Huberman, M. (1990) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1163014 · Cited by 280
Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization: Evidence from Social Science Research
LANDRY, R., AMARA, N., & LAMARI, M. (2001) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547001022004003 · Cited by 264
Research utilization: The state of the art
Huberman, M. (1994) · Knowledge and Policy · doi:10.1007/bf02696290 · Cited by 244
The Acquisition and Utilization of Technical Information by Administrative Agencies
Sabatier, P. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392417 · Cited by 185
In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations
Langley, A. (2007) · Strategy as Practice · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618925.009 · Cited by 181
Balancing relevance and excellence: Organizational responses to link research with decision making
Frenk, J. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90043-p · Cited by 168
Congressional Committees as Users of Analysis
Weiss, C. H. (1989) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324932 · Cited by 146
Explaining use of information in public policymaking
Oh, C. H., & Rich, R. F. (1996) · Knowledge, technology & policy/Knowledge in society/Knowledge, technology, & policy · doi:10.1007/bf02832231 · Cited by 117
Crosswaite, C., & Curtice, L. (1994) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/9.4.289 · Cited by 114
Dunn, W. N. (1983) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/107554708300500107 · Cited by 95
Toward a General Utilization Theory
Wingens, M. (1990) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/107554709001200103 · Cited by 90
The use of research in local health service agencies
Anderson, M. I., Cosby, J., Swan, B., Moore, H., & Broekhoven, M. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00179-3 · Cited by 64
Bogenschneider, K., Olson, J. R., Linney, K. D., & Mills, J. G. (2000) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00327.x · Cited by 62
The utilization of public policy analysis
Lester, J. P., & Wilds, L. J. (1990) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(90)90062-2 · Cited by 53
The Use of Information by Policymakers at the Local Community Level
Florio, E., & DeMartini, J. R. (1993) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/107554709301500104 · Cited by 38
Commissions and the Use of Social Science Research: The Case of Safe Schools
Louis, K. S., & Perlman, R. (1985) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/107554708500700103 · Cited by 6
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.47 · Cited by 4,705
Bridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the Literature
MITTON, C., ADAIR, C. E., MCKENZIE, E., PATTEN, S. B., & PERRY, B. W. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x · Cited by 1,050
A Glossary for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health
Rabin, B. A., Brownson, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., Kreuter, M. W., & Weaver, N. L. (2008) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/01.phh.0000311888.06252.bb · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1060
- OpenAlex
- W2127435700
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
