Cited by 138Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsChronic Disease Management Strategies

New technologies for chronic disease management and control: a systematic review

García-Lizana, Francisca, Sarría-Santamera, Antonio·2007·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of interventions using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for managing and controlling chronic diseases. Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials that assessed the effectiveness of ICTs (except for those that included only telephone communication) and measured some clinical indicator. Information was reviewed and assessed independently by two researchers. Of the 950 clinical trials identified, 56 studies were identified for potential inclusion. Of those, 24 were finally included: 5 studies in asthma, 3 in hypertension, 1 in home telecare, 7 in diabetes, 6 in heart failure and 2 in prevention heart disease. Overall, ICT applications did not show an improvement in clinical outcomes, although no adverse effects were identified. However, ICTs used in the detection and follow up of cardiovascular diseases provided better clinical outcomes, mortality reduction and lower health services utilization. Systems used for improving education and social support were also shown to be effective. At present the evidence about the clinical benefits of ICTs for managing chronic disease is limited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/135763307780096140

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Lizana, F., & Sarría-Santamera, A.
Affiliations
  • Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health 'Carlos III', Madrid, Spain
  • Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health 'Carlos III', Madrid, Spain; Department of Social Medicine, University of Alcalá Faculty of Medicine, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
62-68
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2157911237
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
information and communication technologies, chronic disease management, telemedicine, asthma, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, cardiovascular disease, telehomecare, health education, social support, clinical effectiveness, health care utilization, mortality reduction
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Communications Media, Computer Communication Networks, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review