Cited by 183Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases

Botsis, Taxiarchis, Hartvigsen, Gunnar·2008·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Summary We reviewed the literature on home telecare for elderly patients suffering from chronic diseases. Articles published between 1990 and 2007 were identified via the PubMed database. The literature search yielded 485 papers. After reviewing the title and abstract from each, 54 were selected for closer examination. They were published in 37 different journals. The number of papers increased from one in 1997 to 14 in 2006. The diseases in which home telecare had been used were diabetes (14 studies), heart failure (13 studies), cognitive impairment (dementia and/or Alzheimer's disease, 10 studies), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5 studies), chronic wounds (4 studies) and mobility disabilities (4 studies). Patients were generally satisfied with home telecare, but they preferred a combination of home telecare with conventional health-care delivery. Health-care professionals were positive about telecare. Users felt that on many occasions telecare led to a reduction in costs due to time savings and avoidance of travelling. Even though there were important benefits from home telecare, there are organizational, ethical, legal, design, usability and other matters that need to be resolved before widespread implementation can occur.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2008.070905

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Botsis, T., & Hartvigsen, G.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2008-06
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
195-203
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2160673454
Cited by
183
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
telehomecare, elderly patients, chronic disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic wounds, mobility impairment, patient satisfaction, cost reduction, usability
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Cognition Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Male, Frail Elderly, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Home Care Services, Hospital-Based, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review