Cited by 38Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Patient use and compliance with medical advice delivered by a web-based triage system in primary care

Nijland, Nicol, Cranen, Karlijn, Boer, Henk, van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C, Seydel, Erwin R·2010·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We studied a web-based triage system which was accessible to the general public in the Netherlands. In a retrospective analysis we investigated the type of complaints that were submitted and the kind of advice provided. Over a period of 15 months, 13,133 different people began using the web-based triage system and 3812 patients went right through the triage process to the end. The most frequent complaints were common cold symptoms, such as cough and a sore throat (22%), itch problems (13%), urinary complaints (12%), diarrhoea (10%), headache (8%) and lower back pain (8%). Most commonly, the system generated the advice to contact a doctor (85%) and in 15% of the cases the system provided fully automated, problem-tailored, self-care advice. A total of 192 patients participated in a prospective study and completed an online survey immediately after the delivery of advice. A follow-up questionnaire on actual compliance was completed by 35 patients. Among these, 20 (57%) had actually complied with the advice provided by the system. A regression analysis revealed that intention to comply was strongly related to actual compliance. In turn, intention to comply was strongly related to attitude towards the advice ( P < 0.001). Web-based triage can contribute to a more efficient primary care system, because it facilitates the gatekeeper function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2009.001004

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijland, N., Cranen, K., Boer, H., van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C., & Seydel, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Nijland, Nicol
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2010-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
8-11
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2096336416
Cited by
37
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
medication adherence, medical advice, self-care advice, intention to comply, primary care, gatekeeper function, online health information
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Triage, Remote Consultation, Internet, Gatekeeping, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review