Cited by 132Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesTechnology Use by Older Adults

Telehealth in palliative care in the UK: a review of the evidence

Kidd, Lisa, Cayless, Sandi, Johnston, Bridget, Wengstrom, Yvonne·2010·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We reviewed telehealth applications which were being used in palliative care settings in the UK. Electronic database searches (Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo and Embase), searches of the grey literature and cited author searches were conducted. In total, 111 papers were identified and 21 documents were included in the review. Telehealth was being used by a range of health professionals in oncology care settings that included specialist palliative care, hospices, primary care settings, nursing homes and hospitals as well as patients and carers. The most common applications were: out-of-hours telephone support, advice services for palliative care patients, carers and health professionals, videoconferencing for interactive case discussions, consultations and assessments, and training and education of palliative care and other health-care staff. The review suggests that current technology is usable and acceptable to patients and health professionals in palliative care settings. However, there are several challenges in integrating telehealth into routine practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2010.091108

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kidd, L., Cayless, S., Johnston, B., & Wengstrom, Y.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institute, Stockhom, Sweden
Corresponding author
Kidd, Lisa
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
394-402
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2004344013
Cited by
132
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telemedicine, palliative care, cancer care, videoconferencing, caregiver support, health professions education, hospice, nursing homes, primary care, technology acceptance
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Palliative Care, Telemedicine, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review