The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation
Abstract
The proportion of viable hypoxic cells in EMT6/St/lu tumours assayed 18 and 24 hours after a dose of misonidazole (1.2 mg/g), which killed 80–90% of the tumour cells, was reduced from 20% in the controls to 7% in the misonidazole treated mice. In other experiments, the radiation cell-survival curve of the RIF-1 tumour was assayed in both intradermal and intramuscular sites under both air-breathing and acutely hypoxic conditions. The slope of the survival curve of the intramuscular tumours irradiated under air-breathing conditions was significantly steeper than that of the same tumours growing intradermally (D0 values of 187 rad vs. 357 rad), or when the tumours were irradiated in either site under acutely hypoxic conditions (D0 = 375 rad). Both of these experimental observations are examined in the light of data from other sources, notably from the radiation response of hypoxic cells in spheroids and from observations made from tumours implanted between close, parallel mica sheets (“sandwich” tumours). It is concluded that these results, taken together with the other data, suggest that rodent tumours contain acutely hypoxic cells, as well as the classically described chronically hypoxic cells. It is argued further that, if (as appears to be the case) acutely hypoxic cells are produced by intermittent opening and closing of tumour blood vessels, then this process would provide a simple explanation for the rapid reoxygenation seen in several mouse tumours. Finally, it is pointed out that a consequence of the presence of acutely hypoxic cells in tumours is that they would largely frustrate attempts to radiosensitize tumours using either respiratory inhibitors or high pressure oxygen, or agents designed to selectively kill hypoxic tumour cells, since both of these methods would deal only with the chronically hypoxic cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Tumour Microenvironment after Radiotherapy: Mechanisms of Resistance and Recurrence
Barker, H. E., Paget, J. T. E., Khan, A. A., & Harrington, K. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3958 · Cited by 2,144
Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response
Dewhirst, M. W., Cao, Y., & Moeller, B. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2397 · Cited by 1,022
Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome
Horsman, M. R., Mortensen, L. S., Petersen, J. B., Busk, M., & Overgaard, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.171 · Cited by 614
Tumor hypoxia: its impact on cancer therapy
Moulder, J. E., & Rockwell, S. (1987) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00055376 · Cited by 414
Microenvironment-induced cancer metastasis
Rofstad, E. K. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/095530000138259 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. M.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 620
- Pages
- 650-656
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2136786497
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/0007-1285-52-620-650
- The paper
- Brown, J. M. (1979). Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-52-620-650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.