The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The conical beam computed tomography (CBCT) technique presents an innovation of tomographic imaging systems and subsequent volumetric image reconstruction for dentistry. When compared with other methods of tomographic imaging CBCT is characterized by rapid volumetric image acquisition from a single low radiation dose scan of the patient. The NewTom (NewTom 9000; Quantitative Radiology, Verona, Italy) is an example of such a CBCT machine dedicated to dental and maxillofacial imaging, particularly for surgical and/or prosthetics implant planning in the field of dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the linear measurements obtained in CBCT images using a NewTom. METHODS: Thirteen measurements were obtained in dry skulls (n = 8) between internal and external anatomical sites using a caliper. These were considered as real measurements. Then the dry skulls were submitted to CBCT imaging examinations. Radiographic distance measurements of the same dry skull anatomical sites were made using the NewTom QR-DVT 9000 software of the 2 mm-CTs axial section images and sagittal or coronal reconstructions. The data were compared by paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: The results showed that the real measurements were always larger than those for the CBCT images, but these differences were only significant for measurements of the internal structures of the skull base. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion of this study is that, although the CBCT image underestimates the real distances between skull sites, differences are only significant for the skull base and therefore it is reliable for linear evaluation measurements of other structures more closely associated with dentomaxillofacial imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Timock, A. M., Cook, V., McDonald, T., Leo, M. C., Crowe, J., Benninger, B. L., & Covell, D. A. (2011) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021 · Cited by 301
Alqerban, A., Jacobs, R., Fieuws, S., & Willems, G. (2011) · The European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq034 · Cited by 286
Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries
Cohenca, N., Simon, J. H., Roges, R., Morag, Y., & Malfaz, J. M. (2007) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x · Cited by 209
Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma. Part 2: root resorption
Cohenca, N., Simon, J. H., Mathur, A., & Malfaz, J. M. (2007) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00546.x · Cited by 169
Contemporary imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic dental injuries: A review
Cohenca, N., & Silberman, A. (2017) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.12339 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Lascala, C., Panella, J., & Marques, M.
- Venue
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 291-294
- ISSN
- 0250-832X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-542X
- OpenAlex
- W2120916319
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/dmfr/25500850
- The paper
- Lascala, C., Panella, J., & Marques, M. (2004). Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25500850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.