Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing the Performance of KOH with NaOH-Activated Anthracites in Terms of Methane Storage

Ahmadpour, Ali, Rashidi, Hamed, Mahboub, Mohammad Jaber Darabi, Farmad, Mahsa Razavi·2013·Adsorption Science & Technology

Abstract

Anthracite activated carbons are proper adsorbents for methane storage. In this study, Iranian local anthracite was activated using two commonly used chemicals (sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide) at similar conditions and their products are compared with regard to various properties in order to find the optimal operating parameters such as temperature, chemical ratio and pyrolysis time for producing ACs with high surface area. Three activation temperatures (670, 730 and 790 °C), three chemical-to-coal ratios (2, 2.5 and 3) and two pyrolysis times (1 and 2 hours) were studied in each carbon series (NaOH and KOH). Accordingly, the pore structures of Activated carbon (ACs) were investigated accurately based on adsorption isotherms of nitrogen as well as density functional theory. In addition, their methane storage capacities were also measured and discussed. Specific volumes (microporosity and mesoporosity) of products were also calculated. The KOH ACs had higher micropore volumes, whereas NaOH ACs had relatively higher densities. The highest methane storage was obtained by a KOH AC sample with 3:1 chemical-to-coal ratio (R), activated at 730 °C for 1 hour (AK37301). The stored and delivered methane for this sample were 176 and 158 vol/vol, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/0263-6174.31.8.729

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In similar conditions of activating the process, biomass samples prepared with NaOH had lower surface area and micropore volumes than those with KOH.

    “The comparison of two typical alkaline activation agents, KOH and NaOH, revealed that in the similar condition of activating the process the biomass samples prepared with NaOH had lower surface area and micropore volumes than those with KOH [27].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00085-R · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00127-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.08.010 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.024 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00287-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.022 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00338-X · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.027 · DOI
  9. 10.1260/026361709789868901 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00279-8 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.030 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00124-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00235-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00185-8 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00237-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.10.008 · DOI
  17. 10.1260/0263-6174.30.2.159 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.01.015 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.030 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.046 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.034 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90141-I · DOI
  23. 10.1260/0263617001493585 · DOI
  24. 10.1260/0263617041503471 · DOI
  25. 10.1260/0263-6174.27.9.877 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.03.002 · DOI
  27. 10.1351/pac198557040603 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/BF01653629 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahmadpour, A., Rashidi, H., Mahboub, M. J. D., & Farmad, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91779-48944, Mashhad, Iran
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran
Venue
Adsorption Science & Technology
Published
2013-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
729-745
ISSN
  • 0263-6174
  • 2048-4038
Cited by
13
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review