The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 16 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Activated Carbon Produced by Pyrolysis of Waste Wood and Straw for Potential Wastewater Adsorption
Open accessAbstract
Pyrolysis of straw pellets and wood strips was performed in a fixed bed reactor. The chars, solid products of thermal degradation, were used as potential materials for activated carbon production. Chemical and physical activation processes were used to compare properties of the products. The chemical activation agent KOH was chosen and the physical activation was conducted with steam and carbon dioxide as oxidising gases. The effect of the activation process on the surface area, pore volume, structure and composition of the biochar was examined. The samples with the highest surface area (1349.6 and 1194.4 m2/g for straw and wood activated carbons, respectively) were obtained when the chemical activation with KOH solution was applied. The sample with the highest surface area was used as an adsorbent for model wastewater contamination removal.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Pyrolysis of waste straw pellets and beech wood strips at 800 °C produced biochars that were activated chemically with KOH or physically with steam/CO₂. KOH activation gave the highest surface areas, and the best straw-derived activated carbon removed Rhodamine B from model aqueous solutions.
Key findings
- Chemical activation with KOH produced the highest surface areas: 1349.6 m²/g for straw-derived activated carbon and 1194.4 m²/g for wood-derived activated carbon.
- Physical activation with CO₂ at a 1:1 gas-to-carbon molar ratio gave lower surface areas: 682.1 m²/g and 0.35 cm³/g pore volume for straw, and 385 m²/g and 0.2 cm³/g for wood; lower gas ratios (1:0.5) gave less extended surface area.
- Unactivated biochars had low surface areas: 3.1 m²/g for straw char and 27.3 m²/g for wood char.
- In Rhodamine B adsorption tests using the 1349.6 m²/g straw-based activated carbon, 4.1 mg of AC decreased RhB concentration by 30%, and total removal of the model solution colour occurred when 15.3 mg AC was added.
Methods
- Fast pyrolysis of about 100 g biomass was performed in a fixed-bed steel reactor at 800 °C for 30 min with a heating rate of 100 °C/min under limited air; char yields used were 23.8 g for straw pellets and 22.5 g for wood chips.
- Activation methods: chemical activation with solid KOH at a 1:2 char:KOH mass ratio, heated at 850 °C for 1 h under N₂ at 50 mL/min; physical activation with steam or CO₂ at 850 °C, gas flow 10 dm³/h for 0.5 or 1 h, using biochar-to-gas molar ratios of 1:0.5 and 1:1.
- Materials were characterised by CHNS-O analysis, thermogravimetry, moisture and calorific value analysis, BET N₂ adsorption–desorption at 77 K, and SEM; RhB adsorption was tested at 25 °C with 20 mL of 30 mg/dm³ dye solution, AC doses from 2.7 to 20.6 mg, 30 min shaking at 120 rpm, and UV-VIS at 553 nm.
Limitations
- The paper states that in the adsorption study the authors used only one, but the most important parameter, to confirm sorption properties of the straw-derived AC; pH, temperature, ionic strength, and other solution parameters were kept constant rather than varied.
- Evident from the text: adsorption was tested only with Rhodamine B as a model contaminant, at a single initial concentration of 30 mg/dm³, and only with the highest-surface-area straw-based KOH-activated carbon.
- Evident from the text: no regeneration, reusability, continuous-flow, or real wastewater tests are reported, and the adsorption analysis does not include kinetic or equilibrium isotherm modelling.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Chemical activation was more effective than physical activation.
“The results of the surface analysis revealed that the mechanism of chemical activation was more effective in comparison to the use of other activation agents.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
“Nevertheless, the chemical activation was more effective than the physical method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
The higher the amount of the activation agent, the greater is the adsorption surface.
“Moreover, it was shown that the higher the amount of the activation agent, the greater is the adsorption surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A higher surface area was obtained when CO2 was used as an agent in comparison to steam.
“A higher surface area was obtained when CO2 was used as an agent in comparison to steam.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effectiveness of adsorption increased with increasing amounts of the activated carbon used in the experiment until the complete discoloration of the solution.
“As expected, the effectiveness of adsorption increased with increasing amounts of the activated carbon used in the experiment until the complete discoloration of the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In both physical activation experiments, a lower gas (CO2 and steam) to carbon molar ratio (1:0.5) provided a less extended surface area of the final material.
“In both experiments, a lower gas (CO2 and steam) to carbon molar ratio (1:0.5) provided a less extended surface area of the final material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Total removal of the model solution colour was observed when 15.3 mg AC was added.
“Total removal of the model solution colour can be observed when 15.3 mg AC was added.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Activated carbon produced from straw pellets had higher surface area than that from wood, regardless of the activation method.
“Analysis of the results presented in Table 2 indicate that the surface area of the activated carbons prepared using the straw pellets is relatively higher.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
“A comparison of the results determined for both biomass samples revealed that activated carbon produced from straw pellets had higher surface area regardless of the activation method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
The decomposition of straw pellets occurs in the temperature range of 220-380 °C, similar to the wood sample.
“Comparing the properties of the samples, the decomposition of straw pellets occurs in the temperature range of 220–380 °C, similar to the wood sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
4.1 mg of activated carbon decreased the RhB concentration by 30%.
“Rhodamine, the model waste water contaminant, is adsorbed even by small amounts of AC, with 4.1 mg decreasing the RhB concentration by 30%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Wood is composed of 45.0 wt.% carbon, 6.4 wt.% hydrogen, 1.3 wt.% nitrogen and 47.3 wt.% oxygen.
“Elemental analysis revealed that wood is composed of 45.0 wt.% carbon, 6.4 wt.% hydrogen, 1.3 wt.% nitrogen and 47.3 wt.% oxygen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most of the volatile matter in both raw materials is formed up to 380-400 °C.
“The DTG experiment revealed that most of the volatile matter in both raw materials is formed up to 380–400 °C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analogous wood samples prepared by chemical activation revealed a surface area of 1194.4 m2/g.
“In comparison, analogous samples prepared using wood strips revealed a surface area of 1194.4 m2/g.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Further addition of the adsorbent did not change the colour of the solution.
“Further addition of the adsorbent did not change the colour of the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TG measurements revealed lower mass loss in straw pellets than in wood samples.
“In the contrary to the abovementioned results (volatile matter) these measurements revealed lower mass loss in straw pellets than in wood samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The sample with the highest surface area was obtained by chemical activation of biochar from straw pellets (1349.6 m2/g).
“The sample with the highest surface area was obtained by the chemical activation of biochar obtained from straw pellets (1349.6 m2/g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Chemical activation preferably provides a well-propagated microporous structure inside the raw material particles determining an appropriate adsorption surface.
“Therefore, we confirmed that chemical activation preferably provides a well-propagated microporous structure inside the raw material particles determining an appropriate adsorption surface (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The experiment confirms the sorption properties of the straw pellet activated material.
“The experiment can be observed without using special equipment and confirms the sorption properties of the straw pellet activated material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rhodamine B is a suitable model contaminant for wastewater adsorption.
- Interpretationreasoning
The pellet structure enabled relatively higher penetration of the activation agents during chemical or physical treatment, thus determining the final properties of the material.
“The pellet structure enabled relatively higher penetration of the activation agents during chemical or physical treatment, thus also determining the final properties of the material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Differences in surface area and pore volume arise from the type of activation agent, treatment method and raw material structure.
“The difference in the surface area and pore volume arises from the type of activation agent, treatment method and raw material structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Oxidation led to surface ordering of the material.
“In this regard, oxidation led to surface ordering of the material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Penetration of the material with KOH, and thus modification of the carbon surface, was achieved to a higher extent than in the case of physical activation.
“In this method, penetration of the material with KOH, and thus modification of the carbon surface, was achieved to a higher extent than in the case of physical activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningIn biochars, relative content of hydrogen decreased and nitrogen increased up to 3.4-3.5 wt.%.
“As a consequence of the substrate thermal decomposition, the relative content of hydrogen decreased (released in the gas phase), whereas nitrogen increased (up to 3.4–3.5 wt.%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWith increasing surface area, the number of single particles decreased and the surface became less frayed.
“It was observed that with increasing surface area, the number of single particles decreased and the surface became less frayed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe highest surface area and pore volume of physically treated samples was obtained for a CO2 to carbon molar ratio of 1:1, with 682.1 m2/g and 0.35 cm3/g for straw and 385 m2/g and 0.2 cm3/g for wood.
“The highest surface area and pore volume of the physically treated samples was obtained for a CO2 to carbon molar ratio of 1:1, with results of 682.1 m2/g: 0.35 cm3/g as determined for straw and 385 m2/g: 0.2 cm3/g for wood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWaste straw contained 85.6 wt.% volatiles, 6.7 wt.% moisture and 5.9 wt.% ash.
“For comparison, waste straw contained more volatiles (85.6 wt.%) and more ash 5.9 (wt.%), but less moisture (6.7 wt.%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataRhB was completely adsorbed on porous material and could not be detected using UV-VIS analysis.
“RhB was completely adsorbed on porous material and could not be detected using UV-VIS analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSurface area of reference biochar samples was 3.1 m2/g for straw and 27.3 m2/g for wood.
“The surface area of these samples (reference samples shown in Table 2) was relatively low: 3.1 m2/g and 27.3 m2/g for straw and wood char, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataStraw contained 49.0 wt.% carbon, 6.9 wt.% hydrogen, 1.7 wt.% nitrogen and 36.6 wt.% oxygen.
“According to the elemental analysis the content of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen in the straw was 49.0 wt.%, 6.9 wt.%, 1.7 wt.% and 36.6 wt.%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe DTG curve for wood contains a main degradation peak and a smaller one on the left side, while straw pellet degradation revealed only one main characteristic peak.
“The main difference in both characteristics is that the derivative of mass loss (DTG) curve (Figure 3B), representing pyrolysis of the wood, contains a main degradation peak as well as a smaller one appearing on the left side (wood degrades gradually). The straw pellet degradation, in turn, revealed only one main characteristic peak.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataElemental analysis confirmed an increase in carbon content up to 76.2 wt.% (from 49 wt.% before pyrolysis) in straw chars and 74.0 wt.% (from 45 wt.% before pyrolysis) in wood chars.
“As expected, the elemental analysis confirmed an increase in the carbon content up to 76.2 wt.% (from 49 wt.% before pyrolysis) and 74.0 wt.% (from 45 wt.% before pyrolysis) in the straw and wood chars, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWood samples contained 67.9 wt.% volatiles, 8.4 wt.% moisture and 2.3 wt.% of ash.
“The wood samples contained 67.9 wt.% volatiles, 8.4 wt.% moisture and 2.3 wt.% of ash.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe maximum of the main degradation peak for wood was at 350 °C and was higher than that for straw (maximum at 300 °C).
“However, the maximum of the main peak representing the degradation of wood was detected at 350 °C and this peak was higher than that obtained for straw (maximum at 300 °C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSteam or carbon dioxide used as physical activation agents penetrate solid structure, remove volatile residues and facilitate their desorption.
“Steam or carbon dioxide used as physical activation agents, in turn, penetrate solid structure, remove volatile residues and facilitate their desorption [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Cha, 2016, Production and utilization of biochar: A review, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenIn all RhB removal experiments, particle size, temperature, contact time (30 min), initial concentration, pH and concentration of other ions were kept constant.
“In all experiments of the RhB removal, the particle size, temperature, contact time (30 min), initial concentration, pH and concentration of the other ions were kept constant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe KOH dosage was chosen based on previous investigation [30] which revealed that an increase in the KOH:char mass ratio provides a higher surface area of the material.
“The KOH dosage was chosen based on the previous investigation [30], which revealed that an increase in the KOH: char mass ratio provides a higher surface area of the material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Cha, 2016, Production and utilization of biochar: A review, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe quality and quantity of each pyrolysis product are highly influenced by the temperature of the process, residence time, heating rate, and size and shape of the biomass particles.
“The quality and quantity of each product are highly influenced by the temperature of the process, residence time, heating rate, and size and shape of the biomass particles [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Tripathi, 2016, Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe value of pH does not significantly affect the efficiency of dye adsorption.
“However, the value of pH does not significantly affect the efficiency of dye adsorption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Hema, 2009, Rhodamine B adsorption by activated carbon: Kinetic and equilibrium studies, Indian J. Chem. Technol.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationDuring pyrolysis, biomass is thermally decomposed in oxygen-depleted conditions with temperatures between 300 and 1200 °C.
“During pyrolysis, biomass is thermally decomposed in the oxygen-depleted conditions with temperatures between 300 and 1200 °C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Sharma, 2015, Biomass pyrolysis—A review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [3] Pawel, 2017, Utjecaj temperature na sastav proizvoda pirolize drva, Drv. Ind.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationActivation processes increase porosity, enhance surface areas and modify chemical properties by introducing a variety of surface sites such as carboxylic, phenolic, hydroxylic and carbonyl groups.
“Activation processes increase porosity, enhance surface areas and modify chemical properties by introducing a variety of surface sites such as carboxylic, phenolic, hydroxylic and carbonyl groups [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Figueiredo, 1999, Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons, Carbon N.Y. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationpH determines formation of various ionic species in solutions and influences surface charge of the carbon.
“Nevertheless, pH determines formation of various ionic species in solutions and influences surface charge of the carbon [34,39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Hema, 2009, Rhodamine B adsorption by activated carbon: Kinetic and equilibrium studies, Indian J. Chem. Technol.
- cites [39] Arivoli, 2009, Adsorption of rhodamine B by acid activated carbon-kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies, Orbital source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThermal degradation processes, like pyrolysis or gasification, convert organic matter into gases, oils and chars.
“Thermal degradation processes, like pyrolysis or gasification, were designed to convert the organic matter into a variety of products including gases, oils and chars [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Zhang, 2010, Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass, Energy Convers. Manag. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenIn this study, authors used only one parameter to confirm sorption properties of AC obtained from straw biomass.
“In this study authors used only one, but the most important parameter, to confirm sorption properties of AC obtained from straw biomass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationChemical activation with KOH above 700 °C results in formation of metallic potassium which may influence the biochar structure contributing to larger specific surface area and higher volume of pores.
“According to the literature the chemical activation with KOH above 700 °C results in formation of metallic potassium which may influence the biochar structure contributing in larger specific surface area and higher volume of pores after BET analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIn similar conditions of activating the process, biomass samples prepared with NaOH had lower surface area and micropore volumes than those with KOH.
“The comparison of two typical alkaline activation agents, KOH and NaOH, revealed that in the similar condition of activating the process the biomass samples prepared with NaOH had lower surface area and micropore volumes than those with KOH [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Ahmadpour, 2013, Comparing the Performance of KOH with NaOH-Activated Anthracites in terms of Methane Storage, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationChar with low commercial value formed from waste biomaterials can be activated to produce adsorbents for various industrial processes or used directly as a fuel.
“Char with low commercial value formed from waste biomaterials can be activated to produce adsorbents for various industrial processes or used directly as a fuel [7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Ellem, 2012, Biomass char as a fuel for internal combustion engines, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationChemical activation with alkaline reagents, especially KOH, is widely used, providing materials with very high surface area and defined micropore size distribution.
“Chemical activation with alkaline reagents, especially KOH, is widely used, providing materials with very high surface area and defined micropore size distribution [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Borhan, 2014, Characterization of activated carbon from wood sawdust prepared via chemical activation using potassium hydroxide, Adv. Mater. Res. source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIncreasing temperature and ionic strength of the solution may improve dye adsorption due to enlargement of pore size, activation of the adsorbent, and reduction of the repulsion between carbon and contaminant.
“Additionally, increasing temperature and ionic strength of the solution may also improve the dye adsorption due to enlargement of pore size, activation of the adsorbent as well as reduction of the repulsion between carbon and contaminant [34,39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Hema, 2009, Rhodamine B adsorption by activated carbon: Kinetic and equilibrium studies, Indian J. Chem. Technol.
- cites [39] Arivoli, 2009, Adsorption of rhodamine B by acid activated carbon-kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies, Orbital source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn Poland, the overproduction of straw in relation to agricultural demand reaches about 10 million tons per year, which is equivalent to around 6 million tons of coal.
“For example, in Poland, the overproduction of straw in relation to agricultural demand reaches about 10 million tons per year, which is equivalent to around 6 million tons of coal [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Karcz, 2013, The feasibility of straw as a fuel source for power generating boilers, Inżynieria środowiska
The paper relies on this without support.
Wood is composed of relatively more densely packed cells and is therefore a harder material (hardness above 500 KG/cm2).
“Wood is composed of relatively more densely packed cells, and is therefore a harder material (hardness above 500 KG/cm2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rhodamine B is a suitable model contaminant for wastewater adsorption.
“In this experiment, Rhodamine B was used as a model water contaminant to observe the efficiency of the adsorption by the activated carbon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Straw pellets are a heterogeneous mixture of various waste straw, like wheat and rye, and are commonly used in Polish agriculture and commercially available.
“Typically, the straw pellets are a heterogeneous mixture of various waste straw, like wheat and rye. This pellet is commonly used in Polish agriculture and is commercially available, therefore such biomass was chosen for the experiments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The final surface properties and functionalities of the char are determined by the nature of pyrolyzed precursors and the type of activation process.
“The final surface properties and functionalities of the char are determined by the nature of pyrolyzed precursors and the type of activation process.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Physical-activation molar ratio is stated in opposite directions
MajorThe methods give the 1:0.5 ratio as biochar to activating gas, while the results describe the same specified ratio as gas to carbon. Reversing a 1:0.5 ratio changes the relative amount of gas.
“The molar ratio of the biochar to the activating gas of 1:0.5 and 1:1 was applied.”
“Carbon content data (in % wt.), taken from elemental analysis, were than used for calculation of the amount of CO2 and steam used for the physical activation experiments (gas to carbon molar ratio was chosen to be 1:0.5 and 1:1).”
Macadamia nutshell study attributed to the wrong listed reference
MinorThe text attributes a macadamia nutshell activation study to reference [27], but the listed title of [27] concerns KOH- and NaOH-activated anthracites, not macadamia nutshells.
“Ahmadpour et al. [27], in turn, performed the activation of macadamia nut shells using KOH and ZnCl2 with three different preparation methods at various temperatures (600, 700 and 800 °C).”
“27. Ahmadpour A. Rashidi H. Jaber M. Mahboub D. Comparing the Performance of KOH with NaOH-Activated Anthracites in terms of Methane Storage Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2013 31 729 745 10.1260/0263-6174.31.8.729”
KOH activation described as both solution-based and solid-based
MinorThe abstract says the highest-surface-area samples were produced using KOH solution, but the activation procedure says the char was mixed with solid KOH before heating. Water was added only after activation.
“The samples with the highest surface area (1349.6 and 1194.4 m2/g for straw and wood activated carbons, respectively) were obtained when the chemical activation with KOH solution was applied.”
“The sample (char) was mixed with a solid KOH with a mass ratio of 1:2 and heated at 850 °C.”
Citations
Cites
Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons
Figueiredo, J. L., Pereira, M. F. R., Freitas, M. M. A., & Órfão, J. J. M. (1999) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/s0008-6223(98)00333-9 · Cited by 2,935
KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage
Wang, J., & Kaskel, S. (2012) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2jm34066f · Cited by 2,763
Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review
Tripathi, M., Sahu, J. N., & Ganesan, P. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122 · Cited by 1,759
Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—A review
Ioannidou, O., & Zabaniotou, A. A. (2006) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013 · Cited by 1,534
Rajapaksha, A. U., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Zhang, M., Vithanage, M., Mandal, S., Gao, B., Bolan, N. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.043 · Cited by 1,322
Production and utilization of biochar: A review
Cha, J. S., Park, S. H., Jung, S.-C., Ryu, C., Jeon, J.-K., Shin, M.-C., & Park, Y.-K. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002 · Cited by 1,293
Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass
Zhang, L., Xu, C. (., & Champagne, P. (2010) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.038 · Cited by 1,217
Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology
Kumar, A., V, Jones, D. D., & Hanna, M. A. (2009) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en20300556 · Cited by 925
Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., & Chen, M. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.057 · Cited by 843
Tan, X.-F., Liu, S.-B., Liu, Y.-G., Gu, Y.-L., Zeng, G.-M., Hu, X.-J., Wang, X., Liu, S.-H., & Jiang, L.-H. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083 · Cited by 711
Reaction mechanisms and multi-scale modelling of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis
Anca‐Couce, A. (2015) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.10.002 · Cited by 691
Biomass pyrolysis-a review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies
Sharma, A., Pareek, V., & Zhang, D. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.193 · Cited by 675
Pallarés, J., González-Cencerrado, A., & Arauzo, I. (2018) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.015 · Cited by 648
Surface Chemical Functional Groups Modification of Porous Carbon
Shen, W., Li, Z., & Liu, Y. (2008) · Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering · doi:10.2174/1874478810801010027 · Cited by 622
Maneerung, T., Liew, J., Dai, Y., Kawi, S., Chong, C., & Wang, C. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.047 · Cited by 604
The preparation of activated carbon from macadamia nutshell by chemical activation
Ahmadpour, A., & Do, D. D. (1997) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/s0008-6223(97)00127-9 · Cited by 547
Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: Optimization using response surface methodology
Gratuito, M. K. B., Panyathanmaporn, T., Chumnanklang, R., Sirinuntawittaya, N., & Dutta, A. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.042 · Cited by 447
Cagnon, B., Py, X., Guillot, A., Stoeckli, F., & Chambat, G. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.009 · Cited by 437
Comparison on pore development of activated carbon produced from palm shell and coconut shell
Daud, W. R. W. (2004) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.015 · Cited by 388
Activated Carbons Derived from High-Temperature Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Contescu, C. I., Adhikari, S. P., Gallego, N. C., Evans, N. D., & Biss, B. E. (2018) · C – Journal of Carbon Research · doi:10.3390/c4030051 · Cited by 156
Activated carbon briquettes from biomass materials
Amaya, A., Medero, N., Tancredi, N., Silva, H., & Deiana, C. (2006) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.049 · Cited by 144
Boguta, P., SOKOŁOWSKA, Z., Skic, K., & Tomczyk, A. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115893 · Cited by 98
An economic analysis of biochar production using residues from Eucalypt plantations
Wrobel-Tobiszewska, A., Boersma, M., Sargison, J., Adams, P., & Jarick, S. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.015 · Cited by 66
Cr(III) adsorption by sugarcane pulp residue and biochar
Yang, Z.-H., Xiong, S., Wang, B., Li, Q., & Wu, Y. (2013) · Journal of Central South University · doi:10.1007/s11771-013-1618-4 · Cited by 61
Production and characterization of chars from cherry pulp via pyrolysis
Pehlivan, E., Özbay, N., Yargıç, A. Ş., & Şahin, R. Z. Y. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.002 · Cited by 57
Granular Activated Carbon from Grape Seeds Hydrothermal Char
Purnomo, C. W., Castello, D., & Fiori, L. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8030331 · Cited by 57
Activated carbon from flash pyrolysis of eucalyptus residue
Grima-Olmedo, C., Ramírez-Gómez, Á., Gómez‐Límón, D., & Clemente-Jul, C. (2016) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00155 · Cited by 34
Román, S., Ledesma, B., Álvarez-Murillo, A., Abdulla, A. A.-K., & Yusaf, T. F. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10040542 · Cited by 25
Comparing the Performance of KOH with NaOH-Activated Anthracites in terms of Methane Storage
Ahmadpour, A., Rashidi, H., Mahboub, M. J. D., & Farmad, M. R. (2013) · Adsorption Science & Technology · doi:10.1260/0263-6174.31.8.729 · Cited by 13
Influence of Temperature on Composition of Wood Pyrolysis Products
Kazimierski, P., & Kardaś, D. (2017) · Drvna industrija · doi:10.5552/drind.2017.1714 · Cited by 12
Self-citationBiomass char as a fuel for internal combustion engines
Ellem, G. K., & Mulligan, C. J. (2012) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/apj.636 · Cited by 10
Borhan, A., Taha, M. F., & Hamzah, A. A. (2013) · Advanced Materials Research · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.832.132 · Cited by 7
Elyounssi, K., Volle, G., Hamidi, A. E., & Blin, J. (2018) · International Journal of Green Energy · doi:10.1080/15435075.2018.1482469 · Cited by 2
(2009) · Indian Journal of Chemical Technology
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Pawel, 2017, Utjecaj temperature na sastav proizvoda pirolize drva, Drv. Ind., 68, 307
- McMillan, J.D., Adney, W.S., Mielenz, J.R., and Klasson, K.T. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Humana Press.
- Karcz, 2013, The feasibility of straw as a fuel source for power generating boilers, Inżynieria środowiska, XI–XII, 8
- Enaime, 2017, Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from olive wastes by physical and chemical activation: Application to Indigo carmine adsorption, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 8, 4125
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haleem, A., Shafiq, A., Chen, S., & Nazar, M. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28031081 · Cited by 397
Tee, G. T., Gok, X. Y., & Yong, W. F. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113248 · Cited by 360
Preparation of straw activated carbon and its application in wastewater treatment: A review
Wang, H., Xu, J., Liu, X., & Sheng, L. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124671 · Cited by 214
Adsorption properties of biochars obtained by KOH activation
Jedynak, K., & Charmas, B. (2023) · Adsorption · doi:10.1007/s10450-023-00399-7 · Cited by 146
Iftekhar, S., Heidari, G., Amanat, N., Zare, E. N., Asif, M. B., Hassanpour, M., Lehto, V., & Sillanpää, M. E. T. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01486-x · Cited by 117
Abdullah, R. F., Rashid, U., Ibrahim, M. L., Hazmi, B., Alharthi, F. A., & Nehdi, I. A. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110638 · Cited by 92
Investigating the interactions between dyes and porous/composite materials: A comprehensive study
Zeeshan, M., Javed, T., Kumari, C., Thumma, A., Wasim, M., Taj, M. B., Sharma, I., Haider, M. N., & Batool, M. (2025) · Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scenv.2025.100217 · Cited by 79
Potnuri, R., Suriapparao, D. V., Rao, C. S., Sridevi, V., & Kumar, A. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.006 · Cited by 75
Bosch, D., Back, J. O., Gurtner, D., Giberti, S., Hofmann, A., & Bockreis, A. (2022) · Carbon Resources Conversion · doi:10.1016/j.crcon.2022.09.001 · Cited by 61
A critical review on biochar for environmental applications
Sivaranjanee, R., Kumar, P. S., & Rangasamy, G. (2023) · Carbon letters · doi:10.1007/s42823-023-00527-x · Cited by 51
Kazimierski, P., Januszewicz, K., Godlewski, W., Fijuk, A., Suchocki, T., Chaja, P. R., Barczak, B., & Kardaś, D. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15031038 · Cited by 49
Self-citationKazimierski, P., Hercel, P., Suchocki, T., Smoliński, J., Pladzyk, A., Kardaś, D., Łuczak, J., & Januszewicz, K. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14112969 · Cited by 47
Self-citationChestnut-Derived Activated Carbon as a Prospective Material for Energy Storage
Januszewicz, K., Cymann-Sachajdak, A., Kazimierski, P., Klein, M., Łuczak, J., & Wilamowska-Zawłocka, M. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13204658 · Cited by 45
Self-citationPhysical-Chemical Characterization of Different Carbon-Based Sorbents for Environmental Applications
Marzeddu, S., Décima, M. A., Camilli, L., Bracciale, M. P., Genova, V., Paglia, L., Marra, F., Damizia, M., Stoller, M., Chiavola, A., et al. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15207162 · Cited by 43
Wheat Straw Biochar as a Specific Sorbent of Cobalt in Soil
Medyńska‐Juraszek, A., Ćwieląg‐Piasecka, I., Jerzykiewicz, M., & Trynda, J. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13112462 · Cited by 43
The Circular Economy in the Management of Waste from Leather Processing
Wrzesińska‐Jędrusiak, E., Czarnecki, M., Kazimierski, P., Bandrów, P., & Szufa, S. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16010564 · Cited by 41
Self-citationPinij, P., Tippayawong, N., Chimupala, Y., & Chaiklangmuang, S. (2021) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105234 · Cited by 40
Zhou, Y., Liu, Z., Shan, J., Wu, C., Lichtfouse, É., & Liu, H. (2024) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.111925 · Cited by 40
Cesar, R., Marques, P. J. L., Tavares, J. R. A., Antunes, F. C., Gonçalves, J. M., Vicentini, R., Cavallari, M. R., Brandão, B. B. N. S., Hunt, J. D., Doubek, G., et al. (2024) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03493 · Cited by 37
Trisunaryanti, W., Wijaya, K., Triyono, T., Adriani, A. R., & Larasati, S. (2021) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100258 · Cited by 34
Sanz-Santos, E., Álvarez-Torrellas, S., Larriba, M., Calleja-Cascajero, D., & Garcı́a, J. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115020 · Cited by 33
Krishnamoorthy, H., Ramyea, R., Ayyadurai, M., Kandasamy, K., Michalska, M., & Kandasamy, S. K. (2022) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101187 · Cited by 33
François, M., Lin, K.-S., Rachmadona, N., & Khoo, K. S. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162437 · Cited by 33
Januszewicz, K., Kazimierski, P., Cymann-Sachajdak, A., Hercel, P., Barczak, B., Wilamowska-Zawłocka, M., Kardaś, D., & Łuczak, J. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28824-y · Cited by 32
Self-citationThithai, V., Jin, X., Ahmed, M. A., & Choi, J. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14113002 · Cited by 32
Asimakopoulos, G., Baikousi, M., Kostas, V., Papantoniou, M., Bourlinos, A. B., Zbořil, R., Karakassides, M. A., & Salmas, C. E. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10248812 · Cited by 30
Rzig, B., Kojok, R., Khalifa, E. B., Magnacca, G., Lahssini, T., Hamrouni, B., & Bellakhal, N. (2023) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-023-03982-8 · Cited by 29
Preparing Biochars from Cow Hair Waste Produced in a Tannery for Dye Wastewater Treatment
Song, J., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Zhong, L., Liu, Y., Sun, X., He, B., Li, Y., & Cao, S. J. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14071690 · Cited by 28
Agyemang, E., Ofori‐Dua, K., Dwumah, P., & Forkuor, J. B. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312527 · Cited by 26
Chang, J., & Lee, J.-Y. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17215359 · Cited by 25
Jurgelāne, I., & Ločs, J. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16093605 · Cited by 25
Lazzarini, A., Colaiezzi, R., Gabriele, F., & Crucianelli, M. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14226796 · Cited by 22
Pre-Treatment of Furniture Waste for Smokeless Charcoal Production
Kazimierski, P., Hercel, P., Januszewicz, K., & Kardaś, D. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13143188 · Cited by 22
Self-citationDeng, L., Zhao, Y., Sun, S., Feng, D., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.107922 · Cited by 21
Wisniewska, M. A., Rejer, K., Pietrzak, R., & Nowicki, P. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27238597 · Cited by 20
Wood-derived adsorbents for the removal of pharmaceutical contamination from wastewater: a review
Godiya, C. B., & Leiviskä, T. (2025) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-025-01886-9 · Cited by 19
Functionalized carbon electrocatalysts in energy conversion and storage applications: A review
Dessie, Y., Bekele, E. T., & Wondimu, T. H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39395 · Cited by 18
Skoczko, I., & Gumiński, R. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13225180 · Cited by 18
Rizal, S., Mistar, E. M., Rahman, A. A., Khalil, H. P. S. A., Oyekanmi, A. A., Olaiya, N. G., Abdullah, C. K., & Alfatah, T. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13142303 · Cited by 18
Puglia, M., Morselli, N., Lumi, M., Santunione, G., Pedrazzi, S., & Allesina, G. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14698 · Cited by 17
Barczak, B., & Januszewicz, K. (2025) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.118041 · Cited by 17
Self-citationAlrowais, R., Said, N., Bashir, M. T., Ghazy, A., Alwushayh, B., & daiem, M. M. A. (2023) · Water · doi:10.3390/w15030555 · Cited by 17
Huno, S. K. M., Das, J., van Hullebusch, E. D., Annachhatre, A. P., & Rene, E. R. (2022) · Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing · doi:10.1007/s43393-022-00108-5 · Cited by 15
The review of oral adsorbents and their properties
Berillo, D. A., & Ermukhambetova, A. (2024) · Adsorption · doi:10.1007/s10450-024-00515-1 · Cited by 15
Kaur, J., Sarma, A. K., Gera, P., & Jha, M. K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87622-z · Cited by 15
Narzari, R., Poddar, M. K., Bordoloi, N., Sarmah, A. K., & Kataki, R. (2021) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-021-01448-3 · Cited by 14
Hai, A., Daud, W. M. A. W., Patah, M. F. A., Bharath, G., AlMohamadi, H., Tang, D. Y. Y., Show, P. L., & BANAT, F. A. (2025) · Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances · doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200284 · Cited by 13
Liu, X., Ren, X., Dong, J., Wang, B., Gao, J., Wang, R., Yao, J., & Cao, W. (2023) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.18.4.8536-8556 · Cited by 12
Chataigner, V., Tarlet, D., Ricoul, F., & Bellettre, J. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128848 · Cited by 12
Activated carbon cellulose acetate based as effective adsorbent of contaminants from water
Herrera-González, A. M., Trejo‐Carbajal, N., Reyes‐Angeles, M. C., Monroy-Galindo, R., & Peláez-Cid, A. A. (2024) · Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134146 · Cited by 11
Tsai, W. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12091220 · Cited by 11
de Souza, C. D. R., & da Silva, K. D. C. (2021) · Research Society and Development · doi:10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12698 · Cited by 11
Wang, Q., Fan, L., Sun, J., Tan, Z., Mu, J., Zhou, X., & Sheng, L. (2024) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2024.113158 · Cited by 10
Versatile Eco‐Friendly Activated Carbon–Based Green Catalysts: Energy and Environmental Applications
ur-Rehman, M. H., Hussain, M., Akhter, P., & Jamil, F. (2025) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.70005 · Cited by 10
Lv, T., Zhang, J., Yang, X., & Qiu, J. (2025) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120958 · Cited by 10
Kazimierski, P., Kosmela, P., Piersa, P., & Szufa, S. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16072704 · Cited by 10
Self-citationSustainable Production of Activated Carbon from Waste Wood Using Goethite Iron Ore
Spencer, W., Ibana, D. C., Singh, P., & Nikoloski, A. N. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020681 · Cited by 10
Characterization of Low-Temperature Waste-Wood-Derived Biochar upon Chemical Activation
Yılmaz, B., Kamperidou, V., Akçay, S. B., Kar, T., Fazlı, H., & Varol, T. (2025) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f16081237 · Cited by 9
Gopalan, J., Buthiyappan, A., Rashidi, N. A., Sufian, S. B., & Raman, A. A. A. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-34173-1 · Cited by 9
Sakiewicz, P., Lutyński, M., Sobieraj, J., Piotrowski, K., Miccio, F., & Kalisz, S. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15041352 · Cited by 9
Martínez-Peñuñuri, R., Parga-Torres, J. R., Valenzuela-García, J. L., Díaz-Galaviz, H. J., Zamarripa, G. G., & García-Alegría, A. M. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16144961 · Cited by 9
Bishir, M., Arauzo, P. J., Olszewski, M. P., & Kruse, A. (2021) · Fuel Cells · doi:10.1002/fuce.202000132 · Cited by 9
Uddin, M. R., Mustak, M. H., Nuruzzaman, M., Ahmed, F., Tazrin, J., Rahman, M. A., Bhuiyan, R. H., Ibrahim, K. A., & Idris, A. M. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108488 · Cited by 8
Conversion of Shoot Waste of Fast-Growing Teak into Activated Carbon and Its Adsorption Properties
SUTAPA, J. P. G., Lukmandaru, G., Sunarta, S., Pujiarti, R., Irawati, D., Arisandi, R., Dwiyanna, R., NURULLAH, R. D., & PRIYAMBODO, R. D. (2024) · Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology · doi:10.5658/wood.2024.52.5.488 · Cited by 8
BIOBRICKETS MADE FROM CASSAVA SKIN WASTE UTILIZING BANANA PLASTIC WASTE GLUE AND WATER HYACINTH
Firdaus, A., & Octavianus, B. (2021) · Indonesian Journal of Engineering and Science · doi:10.51630/ijes.v2i2.14 · Cited by 8
Ridjayanti, S. M., Bazenet, R. A., Banuwa, I. S., Riniarti, M., & Hidayat, W. (2023) · Jurnal Belantara · doi:10.29303/jbl.v6i1.815 · Cited by 8
Шайхиев, И. Г., Sverguzova, S. V., Шайхиева, К. И., & Deberdeev, T. R. (2023) · Polymer Science Series D · doi:10.1134/s1995421223030346 · Cited by 8
Saleh, A. M., Mahdi, H. H., Alias, A. B., Ali, O. M., Ghani, W. A. W. A. K., Shihab, T. A., Syed‐Hassan, S. S. A., Ahmed, O. K., & Saleh, N. M. (2024) · Annales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · doi:10.18280/acsm.480408 · Cited by 7
Malinowski, M., & Famielec, S. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15051771 · Cited by 7
Catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and plastic waste for biofuel production: a review
Talwar, P., & Nanda, S. (2026) · Biomass Futures · doi:10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100046 · Cited by 6
Zango, Z. U., Ibnaouf, K. H., Ibrahem, M. A., Garba, A., Wadi, I. A., Ali, A. F., Bello, U., & Adamu, H. (2025) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108998 · Cited by 6
Cao, Z. M., Yu, D. J., He, T., Li, T., Zuo, C., Li, B., Lv, H., Yan, T., & Zheng, W. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13030641 · Cited by 5
Kazimierski, P., Januszewicz, K., Hercel, P., & Kardaś, D. (2023) · Wood Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00226-023-01486-2 · Cited by 5
Self-citationValorization of oil palm empty fruit bunches into activated carbon: A mini-review
Pratama, A. P. A., Rohma, N. A., Elviliana, E., Nafi’ah, R. W., Setyawan, H. Y., Sunyoto, N. M. S., Fatrıasarı, W., Suhartini, S., Jung, Y. H., Idrus, S., et al. (2024) · Advances in Food Science Sustainable Agriculture and Agroindustrial Engineering · doi:10.21776/ub.afssaae.2024.007.01.9 · Cited by 5
Okimiji, O. P. (2024) · The Global Environmental Engineers · doi:10.15377/2410-3624.2024.11.2 · Cited by 5
Hercel, P., & Kardaś, D. (2025) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.123931 · Cited by 5
Self-citationAlkaline Carbonization of Polyacrylonitrile for the Preparation of Microporous Carbon Materials
Efimov, M. N., Zhilyaeva, N. A., Muratov, D. G., Vasilev, A. A., Yushkin, A. A., & Karpacheva, G. P. (2023) · Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1134/s0036024423010077 · Cited by 5
Martínez-Peñuñuri, R., Parga-Torres, J. R., Valenzuela-García, J. L., García-Alegría, A. M., & Zamarripa, G. G. (2023) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106206 · Cited by 5
Jóźwiak, T., Filipkowska, U., Nowicka, A., & Baranowska, N. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30173614 · Cited by 4
Dave, S., Churi, H. S., Vishwakarma, P. A., & Jagtap, U. P. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29076-3.00001-4 · Cited by 3
Activated Carbon from Selected Wood-Based Waste Materials
Kajda-Szcześniak, M., Mainka, A., Ścierski, W., Pawlyta, M., Łukowiec, D., Matus, K., Turyła, K., Lot, D., Barańska, W., & Jabłońska, A. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17072995 · Cited by 3
Majumdar, A., Chakraborty, S., & Kausor, M. A. (2026) · ChemistrySelect · doi:10.1002/slct.73292 · Cited by 3
Supri, S., Lim, T. W., Rahman, M. N. A., Tridtitanakiat, P. C., & Rovina, K. (2025) · Discover Chemistry. · doi:10.1007/s44371-025-00370-1 · Cited by 3
Charcoal-containing building materials for electromagnetic radiation shielding
Бойправ, О. В., Belousova, E., Ahmetdinova, E., & Богуш, Н. В. (2023) · Репозиторий БГУИР (BSUIR Repository) · doi:10.34910/mce.117.9 · Cited by 3
Tinega, J. N., & Warui, C. M. (2021) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-10-2020-0231 · Cited by 3
Decolorization of Lactose-6-Phosphate Solutions Using Activated Carbon
Alsaleem, K. A., Hammam, A. R. A., & Metzger, L. E. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11123357 · Cited by 3
Cao, Z., Li, Y. X., Xie, X., Zhang, H., & Yang, S. (2025) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.20.3.5533-5552 · Cited by 2
Yoganandam, K., Anni Shayana, S., Kohli, D., Mishra, R., Nath, J. K., Niveditha, A. S., Rajasekar, K., Mehar, K., & Kamakshi Priya, K. (2026) · European Journal of Materials · doi:10.1080/26889277.2026.2620187 · Cited by 2
Barczak, B., Gutmańska, K., & Januszewicz, K. (2026) · Food and Bioproducts Processing · doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2026.04.015 · Cited by 2
Self-citationEvaluation of using electric arc furnace slag as an adsorbent for dyes removal
Alazraqi, A. R., & Al-Furaiji, M. H. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/03067319.2021.2014474 · Cited by 2
Production and Characterization of Activated Carbon from Date Seeds
Mustafa, A., & alnoor, H. J. (2022) · Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal · doi:10.12913/22998624/156491 · Cited by 2
Winata, W. F., & Yanti, I. (2023) · EKSAKTA Journal of Sciences and Data Analysis · doi:10.20885/eksakta.vol4.iss1.art3 · Cited by 2
Saleem, M. (2023) · Yanbu Journal of Engineering and Science · doi:10.53370/001c.88782 · Cited by 1
Saleem, M. (2024) · Yanbu Journal of Engineering and Science · doi:10.53370/001c.92144 · Cited by 1
Alkaline Carbonization of Polyacrylonitrile for the Preparation of Microporous Carbon Materials
Efimov, M. N., Zhilyaeva, N. A., Muratov, D. G., Vasilev, A. A., Yushkin, A. A., & Karpacheva, G. P. (2023) · Журнал физической химии · doi:10.31857/s0044453723010077 · Cited by 1
Athmospheric Hydrocracking of Jatropha Oil Using Woodchar Catalyst
Hendriyana, H., Nurdini, L., Khotimah, R. A. K., Sukandi, N. R., Ainun, T. D., Nurjanah, E. O., Yunengsih, Y., & Khoerunnisa, F. (2020) · Jurnal Bahan Alam Terbarukan · doi:10.15294/jbat.v9i02.27304 · Cited by 1
Ali, A. E., Chowdhury, Z. Z., Faisal, A. N., Das, R., Wahab, Y. A., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2022) · Springer water · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93845-1_7 · Cited by 1
Teak wood char catalyst for Jatropha oil cracking
Hendriyana, Nurdini, L., Prabowo, B. H., Trilaksono, G., Aisyah, H. N., & Wilyanti, W. (2022) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0109901
Gopalan, J., Buthiyappan, A., & Raman, A. A. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4534342
Metadata
- Authors
- Januszewicz, K., Kazimierski, P., Klein, M., Kardaś, D., & Łuczak, J.
- Affiliations
- Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
- Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery (PL)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Januszewicz, Katarzyna
- Venue
- Materials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-04-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2047
- ISSN
- 1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7254296
- OpenAlex
- W3017937534
- Semantic Scholar
- 85a6d7a287800aa7b97019bfda605e2e85db8e47
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
- Keywords
- activated carbon, pyrolysis, wood waste, straw, biochar, chemical activation, KOH activation, physical activation, steam activation, CO2 activation, surface area, pore volume, fixed-bed reactor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review