Deep learning for RNA secondary structure determination: gauging generalizability and broadening the scope of traditional methods
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The diverse regulatory functions, protein production capacity, and stability of natural and synthetic RNAs are closely tied to their ability to fold into intricate structures. Determining RNA structure is thus fundamental to RNA biology and bioengineering. Among existing approaches to structure determination, computational secondary structure prediction offers a rapid and low-cost strategy and is thus widely used, especially when seeking to identify functional RNA elements in large transcriptomes or screen massive libraries of novel designs. While traditional approaches rely on detailed measurements of folding energetics and/or probabilistic modeling of structural data, recent years have witnessed a surge in deep learning methods, inspired by their tremendous success in protein structure prediction. However, the limited diversity and volume of known RNA structures can impede their ability to accurately predict structures markedly different from the ones they have seen. This is known as the generalization gap and currently poses a major barrier to progress in the field. In this Perspective article, we gauge method generalizability using a new benchmark data set of structured RNAs we curated from the Protein Data Bank. We also discuss the emergence of deep learning methods for predicting structure probing data and use a new data set to underscore generalization challenges unique to this domain along with directions for future improvement. Expanding beyond improving predictive accuracy, we review how advances in deep learning have recently enabled scalable and accessible optimization of traditional structure prediction methods and their seamless integration with modern neural networks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the revived interest in neural networks in the early 2010s (Krizhevsky et al. 2012), several methods have attempted to apply deep learning to RNA structure prediction (see reviews by Chaturvedi et al. 2025; Zablocki et al. 2025).”
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While deep learning 3D structure prediction — both for proteins and RNAs — makes widespread use of multiple sequence alignments (MSA) (Abramson et al. 2024), this is not the case for RNA secondary structure.”
Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome
Wan, Y., Qu, K., Zhang, Q. C., Flynn, R. A., Manor, O., Ouyang, Z., Zhang, J., Spitale, R. C., Snyder, M. P., Segal, E., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12946 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
mRNA structure regulates protein expression through changes in functional half-life
Mauger, D. M., Cabral, B. J., Presnyak, V., Su, S. V., Reid, D. W., Goodman, B., Link, K., Khatwani, N., Reynders, J., Moore, M. J., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908052116 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Algorithm for optimized mRNA design improves stability and immunogenicity
Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Lin, A., Xu, C., Li, Z., Liu, K., Liu, B., Ma, X., Zhao, F., Jiang, H., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06127-z · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, J., Hu, Z., Sun, S., Tan, Q., Wang, Y., Yu, Q., Zong, L., Hong, L., Xiao, J., Shen, T., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.06.503062 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Rivas, E., Lang, R., & Eddy, S. R. (2012) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.030049.111 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Szikszai, M., Magnus, M., Sanghi, S., Kadyan, S., Bouatta, N., & Rivas, E. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168552 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Szikszai, M., Wang, T.-Y., Krueger, R., Mathews, D. H., Ward, M., & Aviran, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Aviran, Sharon
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2026-01-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-442
- ISSN
- 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9001
- PMC
- PMC12637522
- OpenAlex
- W7119680555
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- RNA (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (UWSC13223)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21GM148835, R35GM145283)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Keywords
- RNA secondary structure prediction, deep learning, generalization gap, benchmark dataset, Protein Data Bank, RNA folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review