Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A strategy to analyze the phenotypic consequences of inhibiting the association of an RNA-binding protein with a specific RNA

Cibois, Marie, Gautier-Courteille, Carole, Vallée, Audrey, Paillard, Luc·2010·RNA

Abstract

Targeted inactivations of RNA-binding proteins (RNA-BPs) can lead to huge phenotypical defects. These defects are due to the deregulation of certain mRNAs. However, we generally do not know, among the hundreds of mRNAs that are normally controlled by one RNA-BP, which are responsible for the observed phenotypes. Here, we designed an antisense oligonucleotide (“target protector”) that masks the binding site of the RNA-BP CUG-binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) on the mRNA Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] that encodes a key player of Notch signaling. We showed that injecting this oligonucleotide into Xenopus embryos specifically inhibited the binding of CUGBP1 to the mRNA. This caused the derepression of Su(H) mRNA, the overexpression of Su(H) protein, and a phenotypic defect, loss of somitic segmentation, similar to that caused by a knockdown of CUGBP1. To demonstrate a causal relationship between Su(H) derepression and the segmentation defects, a rescue experiment was designed. Embryonic development was restored when the translation of Su(H) mRNA was re-repressed and the level of Su(H) protein was reduced to a normal level. This “target protector and rescue assay” demonstrates that the phenotypic defects associated with CUGBP1 inactivation in Xenopus are essentially due to the deregulation of Su(H) mRNA. Similar approaches may be largely used to uncover the links between the phenotype caused by the inactivation of an RNA-BP and the identity of the RNAs associated with that protein.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.1742610

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antisense oligonucleotides allow elucidation of the binding sites and the function of RNA/RBP interactions in cells.

    “As Cibois et al. have also reported (27), antisense oligonucleotides allow us to elucidate the binding sites and the function of RNA/RBP interactions in cells.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1126/science.281.5379.1001 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1147535 · DOI
  3. 10.1242/dev.01528 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/nar/gkn031 · DOI
  5. Kintner, 1985, Monoclonal antibodies to the cells of a regenerating limb, J Embryol Exp Morphol, 89, 37
  6. Legagneux, 1995, Substrate-specific regulation of RNA deadenylation in Xenopus embryo and activated egg extracts, RNA, 1, 1001
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkn388 · DOI
  8. 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9520-9531.2005 · DOI
  9. 10.1042/BJ20060490 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/emboj/17.1.278 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M709657200 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80411-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cibois, M., Gautier-Courteille, C., Vallée, A., & Paillard, L.
Venue
RNA
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
10-15
ISSN
  • 1355-8382
  • 1469-9001
Cited by
20
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review