Cited by 78RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Solution structure of an informationally complex high-affinity RNA aptamer to GTP

Open access
CAROTHERS, JAMES M., DAVIS, JONATHAN H., CHOU, JAMES J., SZOSTAK, JACK W.·2006·RNA

Abstract

Higher-affinity RNA aptamers to GTP are more informationally complex than lower-affinity aptamers. Analog binding studies have shown that the additional information needed to improve affinity does not specify more interactions with the ligand. In light of those observations, we would like to understand the structural characteristics that enable complex aptamers to bind their ligands with higher affinity. Here we present the solution structure of the 41-nt Class I GTP aptamer (K d = 75 nM) as determined by NMR. The backbone of the aptamer forms a reverse-S that shapes the binding pocket. The ligand nucleobase stacks between purine platforms and makes hydrogen bonds with the edge of another base. Interestingly, the local modes of interaction for the Class I aptamer and an RNA aptamer that binds ATP with a K d of 6 μM are very much alike. The aptamers exhibit nearly identical levels of binding specificity and fraction of ligand sequestered from the solvent (81%–85%). However, the GTP aptamer is more informationally complex (~45 vs. 35 bits) and has a larger recognition bulge (15 vs. 12 nucleotides) with many more stabilizing base–base interactions. Because the aptamers have similar modes of ligand binding, we conclude that the stabilizing structural elements in the Class I aptamer are responsible for much of the difference in K d . These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing the number of intra-RNA interactions, rather than adding specific contacts to the ligand, is the simplest way to improve binding affinity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.2251306

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CAROTHERS, J. M., DAVIS, J. H., CHOU, J. J., & SZOSTAK, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
SZOSTAK, JACK W.
Venue
RNA
Published
2006-02-28
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
567-579
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2162296614
Cited by
78
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM53936, GM17438, F32GM017438, R01GM053936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
RNA aptamers, GTP binding, solution structure, binding affinity, information complexity, hydrogen bonding, ATP binding, base-base interactions, ligand specificity, NMR structure
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Guanosine Triphosphate, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Aptamers, Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review