Cited by 132RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Aptamers selected for higher-affinity binding are not more specific for the target ligand

Open access
Carothers, James M., Oestreich, Stephanie C., Szostak, Jack W.·2006·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Previous study of eleven different in vitro-selected RNA aptamers that bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) with K(d)s ranging from 8 microM to 9 nM showed that more information is required to specify the structures of the higher-affinity aptamers. We are interested in understanding how the more complex aptamers achieve higher affinities for the ligand. In vitro selection produces structural solutions to a functional problem that are are as simple as possible in terms of the information content needed to define them. It has long been assumed that the simplest way to improve the affinity of an aptamer is to increase the shape and functional group complementarity of the RNA binding pocket for the ligand. This argument underlies the hypothesis that selection for higher-affinity aptamers automatically leads to structures that bind more specifically to the target molecule. Here, we examined the binding specificities of the eleven GTP aptamers by carrying out competition binding studies with sixteen different chemical analogues of GTP. The aptamers have distinct patterns of specificity, implying that each RNA is a structurally unique solution to the problem of GTP binding. However, these experiments failed to provide evidence that higher-affinity aptamers bind more specifically to GTP. We suggest that the simplest way to improve aptamer K(d)s may be to increase the stability of the RNA tertiary structure with additional intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions; increasingly specific ligand binding may emerge only in response to direct selection for specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja060952q

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [4]Carothers JM, Szostak JW. In: The aptamer handbook: functional oligonucleotides and their applications. Klussmann S, editor. Berlin: Wiley-VCH; 2006. pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. [12]Adami C, Cerf NJ. Physica D (Amsterdam) 2000;37:62–69. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. [13]Adami C. Physics of Life Reviews. 2004;1:3–22. [Google Scholar]
  4. [17]Hofacker IL, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Bonhoeffer LS, Tacker M, Schuster P. Monatshefte f. Chemie. 1994;125:167–188. [Google Scholar]
  5. [18]Sokol RR, Rohlf J. Biometry: The Principals and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd ed. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Co.; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  6. [26]Dieckmann T, Suzuki E, Nakamura GK, Feigon J. RNA. 1996;2:628–640. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [30]Burgstaller P, Famulok M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994;33:1084–1087. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carothers, J. M., Oestreich, S. C., & Szostak, J. W.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2006-05-27
Volume
128
Issue
24
Pages
7929-7937
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1987864397
Cited by
132
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM53936, R01GM053936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
RNA aptamers, GTP binding, in vitro selection, binding affinity, binding specificity, competitive binding, GTP analogues, RNA tertiary structure
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Guanosine Triphosphate, Ligands, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Aptamers, Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review