Cited by 1,300Education during COVID-19 pandemicInnovations in Medical EducationE-Learning and COVID-19

Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era

Open access
Mukhtar, Khadijah, Javed, Kainat, Arooj, Mahwish, Sethi, Ahsan·2020·Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Objective: During COVID-19 pandemic, the institutions in Pakistan have started online learning. This study explores the perception of teachers and students regarding its advantages, limitations and recommendations.Methods: This qualitative case study was conducted from March to April 2020. Using maximum variation sampling, 12 faculty members and 12 students from University College of Medicine and University College of Dentistry, Lahore were invited to participate. Four focus group interviews, two each with the faculty and students of medicine and dentistry were carried out. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using Atlas Ti.Results: The advantages included remote learning, comfort, accessibility, while the limitations involved inefficiency and difficulty in maintaining academic integrity. The recommendations were to train faculty on using online modalities and developing lesson plan with reduced cognitive load and increased interactivities.Conclusion: The current study supports the use of online learning in medical and dental institutes, considering its various advantages. Online learning modalities encourage student-centered learning and they are easily manageable during this lockdown situation. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 How to cite this:Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):COVID19-S27-S31. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12669/pjms.36.covid19-s4.2785

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The advantages of e-learning were flexibility, accessibility, and student-centered learning environment, specifically self-directed and asynchronous learning.

    “In a government sponsored survey, Mukhtar and colleagues determined that the advantages of e-learning were in the flexibility, accessibility, and student-centered learning environment, specifically self-directed and asynchronous learning (Mukhtar et al., 2020).”

    From Online or Face to Face? The Modality of a Learning Strategies Course and Impacts on Grades, GPA, Retention and Persistence for Developmental Students (2026) · cites this paper as Mukhtar et al., 2020

    The Results identify flexibility, accessibility, and student-centered learning—including self-directed and asynchronous learning—as advantages. However, the Methods describe a qualitative case study using focus-group interviews, not a government-sponsored survey; the study limitations place it at a single private-sector university. Our copy does not establish government sponsorship. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Disadvantages of e-learning include lack of feedback from students, attention span, and cheating.

    “In addition to the disadvantages noted by Means and Neilser (2020), lack of feedback from students, attention span, and cheating were also cited as issues (Mukhtar et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A.
Affiliations
University of Lahore (PK)
Corresponding author
Mukhtar, Khadijah
Venue
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
36
Issue
COVID19-S4
Pages
S27-S31
ISSN
  • 1681-715X (ISSN-L)
  • 1682-024X
OpenAlex
W3027736467
Cited by
1,300
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 310 · 2022: 414 · 2021: 268 · 2020: 52
FWCI
396.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, medical education, dental education, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, distance education, academic integrity, faculty training, lesson planning, cognitive load, student-centered learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review