Cited by 38Effects of Radiation ExposureProbiotics and Fermented FoodsCell death mechanisms and regulation

The Protective Effect of Fermented Milk Kefir on Radiation-induced Apoptosis in Colonic Crypt Cells of Rats.

Open access
MATSUU, MUTSUMI, SHICHIJO, KAZUKO, OKAICHI, KUMIO, WEN, CHUN YANG, FUKUDA, EIICHIRO, NAKASHIMA, MASAHIRO, NAKAYAMA, TOSHIYUKI, SHIRAHATA, SANETAKA +2 more·2003·Journal of Radiation Research

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of fermented milk kefir on X-ray-induced apoptosis in the colon of rats, we examined the apoptotic index, the mean number of apoptotic cells detected by H&E staining per crypt in the colon, in control rats and kefir-pretreated rats drinking kefir for 12 days before irradiation. Apoptotic cells were confirmed by TUNEL staining, and active caspase-3 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry. The cell position of apoptotic cells and active caspase-3 positive cells were examined. The apoptotic index of kefir-treated rats was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased 2 h after 1 Gy irradiation in comparison with control rats at crypt cell positions 1-3, 5-7, 13, and 15. Active caspase-3 expression in the kefir-treated rats was also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in comparison with control rats 2 h after 1 Gy irradiation at crypt cell positions 1-4, 13, and 15. This study indicated that kefir protects colonic crypt cells against radiation-induced apoptosis, which was most pronounced in the stem cell region of the crypt. The antiapoptotic effect of fermented milk kefir was due to the inhibition of caspase-3 activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1269/jrr.44.111

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability of kefir to heal wounds can result from its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities, which may act synergistically contributing to healing.

    “The ability of kefir to heal wounds can result from its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities, which may act synergistically contributing to the healing (92) .”

    From Milk <i>kefir</i> : nutritional, microbiological and health benefits (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Introduction reports antibacterial effects of kefir in animals, supporting the antimicrobial component. The Discussion instead examines protection against radiation-induced apoptosis in rat colonic cells; it does not link anti-inflammatory activity or synergy between the two activities to wound healing. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • After 2 weeks of treatment, wound area and percentage of inflammation were reduced in animals treated with kefir grains and gel compared with those treated with silver sulfadiazine cream.

    “After 2 weeks of treatment, the wound area and the percentage of inflammation were reduced in animals treated with kefir grains and gel compared with those treated with silver sulfadiazine cream, used for the topical treatment of burns of second and third degrees.”

    From Milk <i>kefir</i> : nutritional, microbiological and health benefits (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Methods describe rats consuming kefir for 12 days before irradiation, and the Results measure apoptosis in colonic crypt cells. Searches for wound area, inflammation, kefir gel, burns, and silver sulfadiazine found no passage addressing the claimed wound-treatment comparison. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The percentage of epithelialisation and healing in animals treated with kefir was improved.

    “In addition, the percentage of epithelialisation and healing in animals treated with kefir was also improved.”

    From Milk <i>kefir</i> : nutritional, microbiological and health benefits (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Results report reduced radiation-induced apoptosis in colonic crypt cells of kefir-treated rats, and the Discussion describes protection of the epithelial stem-cell region. Neither section reports a percentage of epithelialisation or measures healing; searches for epithelialisation, wound healing, and regeneration found no such outcome. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treatment with kefir gel was effective in improving outcomes from a severe burn compared with conventional treatment.

    “The authors concluded that treatment with kefir gel was effective in improving outcomes from a severe burn compared with conventional treatment (92) .”

    From Milk <i>kefir</i> : nutritional, microbiological and health benefits (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Animals and treatment with kefir section describes rats drinking kefir before irradiation, and the Discussion reports reduced radiation-induced apoptosis in their colonic cells. Searches for severe burns, kefir gel, and conventional burn treatment found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]15. Nagira, T., Narisawa, J., Teruya, K., Kusumoto, K., Katakura, Y., Barnes, D. W., Tokumaru, S. and Shirahata, S. (1999) Sup- pression of apoptosis in UV-damaged human melanoma cells by a fermented milk, Kefir. In: Animal Cell Technology: Prod- ucts from Cells, Cells as Products, Eds. A. Bernard et al., pp. 437-439, Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
  2. [29]29. Potten, C.S. (1995) Structure, function and proliferative organi- zation of mammalian gut. In: Radiation and Gut, Eds. C.S. Pot- ten and J. H. Hendry, pp. 1-31, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MATSUU, M., SHICHIJO, K., OKAICHI, K., WEN, C. Y., FUKUDA, E., NAKASHIMA, M., NAKAYAMA, T., SHIRAHATA, S., TOKUMARU, S., & SEKINE, I.
Affiliations
  • Nagasaki University (JP)
  • Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
MATSUU, MUTSUMI
Venue
Journal of Radiation Research
Published
2003
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
111-115
ISSN
0449-3060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149355593
Cited by
38
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
kefir, fermented milk, radiation-induced apoptosis, colonic crypt cells, X-ray irradiation, caspase-3, radiation protection, colonic stem cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Colon, Male, Microvilli, Milk, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Protection, Rats, Wistar, Apoptosis, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review