The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dose-dependent Incorporation of Tea Catechins, (–)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (–)-Epigallocatechin, into Human Plasma
Abstract
Tea catechins, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCg) and (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), have been reported to suppress oxidation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) in vitro. If dietary catechins can be efficiently incorporated into human blood plasma, anti-atherosclerotic effects in preventing oxidative modification of LDL would be expected. In this study, a newly developed chemiluminescence detection-high pressure liquid chromatography (CL-HPLC) method for measuring plasma catechins was used and the incorporation of EGCg and EGC into human plasma was investigated. Healthy subjects orally ingested 3, 5, or 7 capsules of green tea extract (corresponding to 225, 375, and 525 mg EGCg and 7.5, 12.5, and 17.5 mg EGC, respectively). The plasma EGCg and EGC concentrations before the administration were all below the detection limit (< 2 pmol/ml), but 90 min after, significantly and dose-dependently increased to 657, 4300, and 4410 pmol EGCg/ml, and 35, 144, and 255 pmol EGC/ml, in the subjects who received 3, 5, and 7 capsules, respectively. Both EGCg and EGC levels detected in plasma corresponded to 0.2-2.0% of the ingested amount. Catechin intake had no effect on the basal level of endogenous antioxidants (alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, and lycopene) or of lipids in plasma. These results suggested that drinking green tea daily would contribute to maintain plasma catechin levels sufficient to exert antioxidant activity against oxidative modification of lipoproteins in blood circulation systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies
Manach, C., Williamson, G., Morand, C., Scalbert, A., & Rémésy, C. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.1.230s · Cited by 4,219
Dietary Intake and Bioavailability of Polyphenols
Scalbert, A., & Williamson, G. (2000) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/130.8.2073s · Cited by 3,658
Denison, M. S., & Nagy, S. R. (2003) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.135828 · Cited by 1,895
Flavonols, flavones and flavanols - nature, occurrence and dietary burden
Hollman, P. C., & Arts, I. C. (2000) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<1081::aid-jsfa566>3.0.co;2-g · Cited by 527
Chow, H.-H. S., Hakim, I. A., Vining, D. R., Crowell, J. A., Ranger-Moore, J., Chew, W. M., Celaya, C. A., Rodney, S. R., Hara, Y., & Alberts, D. S. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2549 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagawa, K., Okuda, S., & Miyazawa, T.
- Venue
- Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1981-1985
- ISSN
- 0916-8451 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-6947
- OpenAlex
- W1967557898
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-dependent Incorporation of Tea Catechins, (–)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (–)-Epigallocatechin, into Human Plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1271/bbb.61.1981
- The paper
- Nakagawa, K., Okuda, S., & Miyazawa, T. (1997). Dose-dependent Incorporation of Tea Catechins, (–)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (–)-Epigallocatechin, into Human Plasma. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.61.1981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.