Cited by 63Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Öğrencilerinin Çevrimiçi Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeyleri, Algıladıkları Yapı ve Etkileşim Arasındaki İlişki

Open access
Sakarya Üniversitesi, DEMİR KAYMAK, Zeliha, Barış HORZUM, Mehmet·2013·Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12738/estp.2013.3.1580

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Üniversitesi, S., DEMİR KAYMAK, Z., & Barış HORZUM, M.
Venue
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice
Published
2013-05-22
ISSN
1303-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2333488087
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
tr
Open access
Locations
Educational Sciences Theory & Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
online learning, perceived interaction, e-learning adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review