Cited by 65Electronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

A prescription for note bloat: an effective progress note template

Kahn, Daniel, Stewart, Elizabeth, Duncan, Mark, Lee, Edward, Simon, Wendy, Lee, Clement, Friedman, Jodi, Mosher, Hilary +4 more·2018·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: United States hospitals have widely adopted electronic health records (EHRs). Despite the potential for EHRs to increase efficiency, there is concern that documentation quality has suffered. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of an educational session bundled with a progress note template on note quality, length, and timeliness. DESIGN: A multicenter, nonrandomized prospective trial. SETTING: Four academic hospitals across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Intern physicians on inpatient internal medicine rotations at participating hospitals. INTERVENTION: A task force delivered a lecture on current issues with documentation and suggested that interns use a newly designed best practice progress note template when writing daily progress notes. MEASUREMENTS: Note quality was rated using a tool designed by the task force comprising a general impression score, the validated Physician Documentation Quality Instrument, 9-item version (PDQI-9), and a competency questionnaire. Reviewers documented number of lines per note and time signed. RESULTS: Two hundred preintervention and 199 postintervention notes were collected. Seventy percent of postintervention notes used the template. Significant improvements were seen in the general impression score, all domains of the PDQI-9, and multiple competency items, including documentation of only relevant data, discussion of a discharge plan, and being concise while adequately complete. Notes had approximately 25% fewer lines and were signed on average 1.3 hours earlier in the day. CONCLUSIONS: The bundled intervention for progress notes significantly improved the quality, decreased the length, and resulted in earlier note completion across 4 academic medical centers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12788/jhm.2898

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical note templates may improve documentation outcomes.

    “First, although clinical note templates may improve documentation outcomes (15), descriptions of template design methods and procedures are sparse.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, D., Stewart, E., Duncan, M., Lee, E., Simon, W., Lee, C., Friedman, J., Mosher, H., Harris, K., Bell, J., Sharpe, B., & El‐Farra, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Alameda Health System (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles
Corresponding author
Kahn, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
378-382
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W2782601438
Cited by
65
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic health records, clinical documentation quality, medical interns, documentation education, discharge planning
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Documentation, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Male, Prospective Studies, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review