Cited by 146COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesRespiratory Support and MechanismsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Effect of Systemic Glucocorticoids on Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19

Open access
Keller, Marla J, Kitsis, Elizabeth A, Arora, Shitij, Chen, Jen-Ting, Agarwal, Shivani, Ross, Michael J, Tomer, Yaron, Southern, William·2020·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

The efficacy of glucocorticoids in COVID-19 is unclear. This study was designed to determine whether systemic glucocorticoid treatment in COVID-19 patients is associated with reduced mortality or mechanical ventilation. This observational study included 1,806 hospitalized COVID-19 patients; 140 were treated with glucocorticoids within 48 hours of admission. Early use of glucocorticoids was not associated with mortality or mechanical ventilation. However, glucocorticoid treatment of patients with initial C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥20 mg/dL was associated with significantly reduced risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08- 0.70), while glucocorticoid treatment of patients with CRP <10 mg/dL was associated with significantly increased risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.39-5.03). Whether glucocorticoid treatment is associated with changes in mortality or mechanical ventilation in patients with high or low CRP needs study in prospective, randomized clinical trials. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2020;15:XXX-XXX. © 2020 Society of Hospital Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12788/jhm.3497

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An observational study suggested that patients with Covid-19 have a good response to glucocorticoids when the CRP level is high but a poor response when the level is low.

    “An observational study suggesting that patients with Covid-19 have a good response to glucocorticoids when the CRP level is high but a poor response when the level is low is consistent with these findings.101”

    From Cytokine storm (2020) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, M. J., Kitsis, E. A., Arora, S., Chen, J.-T., Agarwal, S., Ross, M. J., Tomer, Y., & Southern, W.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Keller, Marla J
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-22
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
489-493
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W3045374676
Cited by
146
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 32
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, systemic glucocorticoids, mortality, mechanical ventilation, C-reactive protein, hospitalized patients, corticosteroid therapy, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Reactive Protein, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Coronavirus Infections, Racial Groups, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review