The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables
Abstract
This study contributes to the growing body of literature on the value of enterprise resource planning (ERP) investments at the firm level. Using an organization integration lens that takes into account investments in complementary resources as well as an options thinking logic about the value of an ERP platform, we argue that not all ERP purchases have the same potential impact at the firm level due to ERP project decisions made at the time of purchase. Based on a sample of 116 investment announcements in United States–based firms between 1997 and 2001, we find support for our hypotheses that ERP projects with greater functional scope (two or more value-chain modules) or greater physical scope (multiple sites) result in positive, higher shareholder returns. Furthermore, the highest increases in returns (3.29%) are found for ERP purchases with greater functional scope and greater physical scope; negative returns are found for projects with lesser functional scope and lesser physical scope. These findings provide empirical support for prior theory about the organizational integration benefits of ERP systems, the contribution of complementary resource investments to the business value of IT investments, and the growth options associated with IT platform investments. The article concludes with implications of our firm-level findings for this first wave of enterprise systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,701
Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance
Weil, K. E. (1985) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10,284
Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance
Ponter, M. E. (1998) · Cited by 5,801
Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory.
Udy, S. H., & Thompson, J. D. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092248 · Cited by 4,134
The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525569 · Cited by 3,575
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148636 · Cited by 3,372
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036530 · Cited by 3,228
The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. W. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.321524 · Cited by 3,063
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148626 · Cited by 2,822
EVENT STUDIES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES.
McWILLIAMS, A., & SIEGEL, D. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257056 · Cited by 1,940
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1515/9780804767811 · doi:10.1515/9780804767811
- Brown C., 1999, Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems
- Brown C., 2003, MIS Quart. Executive, 2, 45
- Cotteleer M. J., MIS Quart.
- Edmondson G., 1997, Bus. Week, 40
- Hunter S. D., 2003, J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl., 5, 1
- Markus M. L., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past
- Weill P., 2002, MIS Quart. Executive, 1, 17
Cited by
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
ERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review
Ali, M., & Miller, L. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2014-0071 · Cited by 221
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Information Technology Impacts on Firm Performance: An Extension of Kohli and 1
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.4 · Cited by 200
Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.-H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222280305 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranganathan, C., & Brown, C. V.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-161
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2115273186
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 36.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1060.0084
- The paper
- Ranganathan, C., & Brown, C. V. (2006). ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.