The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context
Abstract
Agility is increasingly being seen as an essential element underlying the effectiveness of globally distributed information systems development (ISD) teams today. However, for a variety of reasons, such teams are often unable develop and enact agility in dealing with changing situations. This paper seeks to provide a deeper understanding of agility through an intensive study of the distributed ISD experience in TECHCOM, an organization widely recognized for its excellence in IT development and use. The study reveals that agility should be viewed as a multifaceted concept having three dimensions: resource, process, and linkage. Resource agility is based on the distributed development team's access to necessary human and technological resources. Process agility pertains to the agility that originates in the team's systems development method guiding the project, its environmental scanning, and sense-making routines to anticipate possible crises, and its work practices enabling collaboration across time zones. Linkage agility arises from the nature of interactional relationships within the distributed team and with relevant project stakeholders, and is composed of cultural and communicative elements. The paper highlights some of the difficulties in developing agility in distributed ISD settings, provides actionable tactics, and suggests contingencies wherein different facets of agility may become more (or less) critical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · cited 1×
“In identifying and clarifying the elements of agility, and presenting an inductively developed conceptual framework for agility in the distributed ISD setting, we believe that the study makes an important contribution to the existing literature in the form of a “Type I” theory (Gregor 2006).”
MethodThe SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781848607941 · Cited by 2,798
Walsham, G. (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589 · Cited by 2,217
Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600 · Cited by 1,063
Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000485 · Cited by 309
Self-citationAligning IT components to achieve agility in globally distributed system development
Lee, O.-K. (., Banerjee, P., Lim, K. H., Kumar, K., Hillegersberg, J. V., & Wei, K. K. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1164394.1164419 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead
University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Xu, X., & The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00428 · Cited by 2,513
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002 · Cited by 453
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410419 · Cited by 367
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development
Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12012 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarker, S., & Sarker, S.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 440-461
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2126734861
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 52.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1090.0241
- The paper
- Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2009). Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.