The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model
Abstract
This paper is the first test of a parsimonious model that posits three factors as determinants of the adoption of electronic data interchange (EDI): readiness, perceived benefits, and external pressure. To construct the model, we identified and organized the factors that were found to be influential in prior EDI research. By testing all these factors together in one model, we are able to investigate their relative contributions to EDI adoption decisions. Senior purchasing managers, chosen for their experience with EDI and proximity to the EDI adoption decision, were surveyed and their responses analyzed using structural equation modeling. All three determinants were found to be significant predictors of intent to adopt EDI, with external pressure and readiness being considerably more important than perceived benefits. We show that the constructs in this model can be categorized into three levels: technological, organizational, and interorganizational. We hypothesize that these categories of influence will also be determinants of the adoption of other emerging forms of interorganizational systems (IOS).1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506730 · Cited by 1,099
An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems*
Grover, V. (1993) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x · Cited by 757 · cited 3×
“Table 1 Comparison of the Research Model to Other Studies Saunders & Clark 1992 Bouchard 1993 Grover 1993 Premkumar et al.,1993 Premkumar & Ramamurthy 1995 Bensaou & Venkatraman 1996 Premkumar et al., 1997 Hart & Saunders 1997, 1998 Crook & Kumar 1998 Ramamurthy et al., 1999”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639
Self-citationThe Technology–Organization–Environment Framework
Baker, J. (2012) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12 · Cited by 1,275
Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models
Selim, H. M. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004 · Cited by 1,055
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Metadata
- Authors
- Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 304-321
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W1973160246
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 91.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
