The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement
Abstract
We propose the Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle (NEBIC) as an applied dynamic capabilities theory for measuring, predicting, and understanding a firm's ability to create customer value through the business use of digital networks. The theory incorporates both a variance and process view of net-enabled business innovation. It identifies four sequenced constructs: Choosing new IT, Matching Economic Opportunities with technology, Executing Business Innovation for Growth, and Assessing Customer Value, along with the processes and events that interrelate them as a cycle. The sequence of these theorized relationships for net-enablement (NE)1 asserts that choosing IT precedes rather than aligns with corporate strategy. The theory offers a logically consistent and falsifiable basis for grounding research programs on metrics of net-enabled business innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
The value of Internet commerce to the customer
Keeney, R. L. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.4.533 · Cited by 810
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Cited by
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3 · Cited by 4,392
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036530 · Cited by 3,228
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
“Table I shows that several authors have discussed specific qualities of dynamic capabilities (Zollo and Winter, 2002), the internal and external antecedents of their formation processes (Blyler and Coff, 2003; Korr and Mahoney, 2005; Verona and Ravasi, 2003; Wheeler 2002; Zollo and Winter, 2002) and the various manage…”
BackgroundYoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, B. C.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-146
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2165784021
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 58.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89
- The paper
- Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
