Crowdfunding and the Democratization of Access to Capital—An Illusion? Evidence from Housing Prices
Open accessAbstract
Access to finance is arguably one of the most critical challenges in starting a new business. And people say that crowdfunding has the potential to democratize access to finance. In this study, we examine whether crowdfunding democratizes access to finance and, if so, how. To examine this, we obtained data on housing prices related closely to the cost of accessing bank loans and matched these data to a 2009–2013 novel data set from a leading crowdfunding market. We find an increased decline in housing prices leads to a significant increase in the creation of crowdfunding projects. However, we did not find significant differential effects in housing price changes between successful and unsuccessful projects. Finally, the effect of housing prices on crowdfunding projects was more significant for areas with low socioeconomic status. Interestingly, the increase in crowdfunding projects in these low-status areas was driven wholly by a significant increase in unsuccessful projects, whereas the effect of housing prices on successful projects was significant only in areas of high socioeconomic status. Overall, our study suggests that crowdfunding can supplement traditional sources of funding although socioeconomic status may still prevent disadvantaged people from receiving its full benefits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CBP dataset provides annual subnational economic data by industry and MSA and has been widely used in IS research.
“The CBP dataset provides annual subnational economic data by industry and MSA, and it has widely been used in extant IS research (e.g., Kim and Hann 2019).”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Kim and Hann 2019
County Business Patterns data have been widely used in prior studies to examine or control local establishment counts by industry.
“County Business Patterns have been widely used in prior studies to examine or control the number of local establishments by industry.”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Kim and Hann (2019)
Cites
Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression
Stock, J., & Yogo, M. (2002) · doi:10.3386/t0284 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment
Guo, X., Cheng, Z. (., & Pavlou, P. A. (2025) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.0307 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, K., & Hann, I.-H.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keongtae Kim
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 276-290
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2917854355
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 20.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Keywords
- crowdfunding, access to finance, democratization of finance, housing prices, socioeconomic status, crowdfunding project success, low-income areas, access to capital
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review