The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study
Abstract
Information Systems (IS) planning has gained considerable interest among researchers and practitioners in recent years because of the large investments that firms have made in IS and the increasingly strategic nature of the impact of information systems on organizational performance. Since IS planning is performed in an organizational context, characteristics of the organization may have a significant influence on the quality and effectiveness of the IS planning process. A research model is developed that links two major dimensions of IS planning—the quality of the planning process and planning effectiveness—with a set of eight organizational factors derived from contingency research in IS planning, strategic business planning, organizational studies, and technology innovation. The model is validated using data collected from a field survey of 249 senior IS executives. Canonical correlation analysis is used to test the research hypotheses and validate the model. The results of the study indicate that the two planning dimensions respectively reflecting the “means” and “ends” of IS planning are equally important. The results also indicate that planning resources, the intended strategic impact of IS on future business operations, the quality of facilitation mechanisms, the quality of implementation mechanisms, and the quality of strategic business planning are significantly associated with the quality and effectiveness of IS planning. The implications of the results to further research and to managerial practice are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Determinants of success for computer usage in small business
DeLone, W. H. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248803 · Cited by 703
An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems
Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849 · Cited by 351
Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies
Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/32206.315753 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance
Wang, C. L. (2008) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x · Cited by 1,056
Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems
Ramdani, B., Kawalek, P., & Lorenzo, O. (2009) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390910922796 · Cited by 582
Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230306 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Premkumar, G., & King, W. R.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-109
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2014172587
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.5.2.75
- The paper
- Premkumar, G., & King, W. R. (1994). Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.2.75
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.