The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research
Abstract
This paper investigates aspects of the history and current state of interpretivism in IS research. The emergence of interpretivism is explored through the identification of a network of IS researchers working in the interpretive tradition, through an examination of the role of mainstream and alternative IS journals, and through an analysis of the rhetoric used to support interpretive claims. The paper contributes to analysis of the development of the IS field as a whole, and provides some conceptual ideas and a reference point for further work in this relatively neglected area of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Cited by
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology
Mingers, J. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 · Cited by 1,380
Empowering Women through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India
Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00505.x · Cited by 634
A Critical Analysis of Decision Support Systems Research
Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2005) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000035 · Cited by 571
The Struggle for District-Based Health Information Systems in South Africa
Braa, J., & Hedberg, C. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290075048 · Cited by 257
Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E. R., & Monod, E. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.31 · Cited by 167
Doolin, B. (1998) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.1998.8 · Cited by 125
A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation
Ward, J., Hemingway, C., & Daniel, E. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 100
Borman, M., & Janssen, M. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.012 · Cited by 56
(2008) · Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management · Cited by 30
Moving beyond showcasing: The five faces of leadership in smart city transformation
Cranefield, J., & Pries-Heje, J. (2020) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.12910076.v1 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsham, G.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 376-394
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2033469757
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
