The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use and Effects of Knowledge-Based System Explanations: Theoretical Foundations and a Framework for Empirical Evaluation
Abstract
Ever since MYCIN introduced the idea of computer-based explanations to the artificial intelligence community, it has come to be taken for granted that all knowledge-based systems (KBS) need to provide explanations. While this widely-held belief has led to much research on the generation and implementation of various kinds of explanations, there has been no theoretical basis to justify the use of explanations by KBS users. This paper discusses the role of KBS explanations to provide an understanding of both the specific factors that influence explanation use and the consequences of such use. The first part of the paper proposes a model based on cognitive learning theories to identify the reasons for the provision of KBS explanations from the perspective of facilitating user learning. Using the feedforward and feedback operators of cognitive learning the paper develops strategies for providing KBS explanations and classifies the various types of explanations found in current KBS applications. This second part of the paper presents a two-part framework to investigate empirically the use of KBS explanations. The first part of the framework focuses on the potential factors that influence the explanation seeking behavior of KBS users, including user expertise, the types of explanations provided and the level of user agreement with the KBS. The second part of the framework explores the potential effects of the use of KBS explanations and specifically considers four distinct categories of potential effects: explanation use behavior, learning, perceptions, and judgmental decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Self-citationAcquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146
The epistemology of a rule-based expert system —a framework for explanation
Clancey, W. J. (1983) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(83)90008-5 · Cited by 712
Effects of cognitive feedback on performance.
Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.106.3.410 · Cited by 516
An explanation facility for today's expert systems
Wick, M. R., & Slagle, J. R. (1989) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/64.21897 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. E. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132331 · Cited by 667
Langer, M., Oster, D., Speith, T., Hermanns, H., Kästner, L., Schmidt, E., Sesing, A., & Baum, K. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473 · Cited by 652
Explanations From Intelligent Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Practice1
Gregor, S., & Benbasat, I. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249487 · Cited by 535
Self-citationExplainable artificial intelligence: Objectives, stakeholders, and future research opportunities
Meske, C., Bunde, E., Schneider, J., & Gersch, M. (2022) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465 · Cited by 365
Schlicker, N., Langer, M., Ötting, S. K., Baum, K., König, C. J., & Wallach, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106837 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhaliwal, J. S., & Benbasat, I.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 342-362
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2001513986
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use and Effects of Knowledge-Based System Explanations: Theoretical Foundations and a Framework for Empirical Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.7.3.342
- The paper
- Dhaliwal, J. S., & Benbasat, I. (1996). The Use and Effects of Knowledge-Based System Explanations: Theoretical Foundations and a Framework for Empirical Evaluation. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.3.342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.