The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology
Abstract
The acceptance of new information technologies by their intended users persists as an important issue for researchers and practitioners of information systems. Several models have been developed in the literature to facilitate understanding of the process by which new information technologies are adopted. This paper proposes a new construct that further illuminates the relationships explicit in the technology acceptance models and describes an operational measure for this construct that possesses desirable psychometric properties. The construct, personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology, is hypothesized to exhibit moderating effects on the antecedents as well as the consequences of individual perceptions about a new information technology. The construct was developed and validated in the context of the innovation represented by the World-Wide Web. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 9 (a-d): Higher levels of Personal innovativeness in technology adoption will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Agarwal and Prasad,1998
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 9 (a-d): Higher levels of Personal innovativeness in technology adoption will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Agarwal and Prasad,1998
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 9 (a-d): Higher levels of Personal innovativeness in technology adoption will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Agarwal and Prasad,1998
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 9 (a-d): Higher levels of Personal innovativeness in technology adoption will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Agarwal and Prasad,1998
In the citing paper
“the extensive focus of TAM on technology to the neglect of social and psychological parameters (Agarwal & Prasad, 1998;Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) limits its explanatory and predictive utilities, and therefore demands its integration with other frameworks”
From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Agarwal & Prasad, 1998
In the citing paper
“Personal innovativeness (PI) has been acknowledged as important factor that impact technology adoption and usage (Agarwal & Prasad, 1998).”
From Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (2024) · cites this paper as Agarwal & Prasad, 1998
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
(2025) · doi:10.53555/acr.v2i2 · Cited by 13,486
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Brancheau J. C., 1990, Inform. Systems Res., 1, 41
- Carroll J., 1996, Comput. Canada, 22, 33
- Delmonico D., 1996, Comm. Week, 592, 46
- Jackson D. N. A., 1976, Jackson Personality Inventory Manual
- Joreskog K. G., 1993, Lisrel 8, User's Reference Guide
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- Rogers E. M., 1971, Communication of Innovations
- Rogers E. M., 1983, Diffusion of Innovations
- Wexler J., 1993, Computerworld, 27, 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,007
Augmented Virtual Doctor Office: Theory-based Design and Assessment
Zahedi, F. M., Walia, N., & Jain, H. K. (2016) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1243952 · Cited by 51
Predicting IoT Service Adoption towards Smart Mobility in Malaysia: SEM-Neural Hybrid Pilot Study
Ahmed, W., Muhamad, S., Sentosa, I., Akter, H., Yafi, E., & Ali, J. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110165 · Cited by 49
Data-driven modeling of technology acceptance: A machine learning perspective
Alwabel, A. S. A., & Zeng, X. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115584 · Cited by 64
Determinants of individuals’ intentions to use central bank digital currency: evidence from China
Liu, X., Wang, Q., Wu, G., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2131517 · Cited by 48
An empirical examination of guests' adoption of interactive mobile technologies in hotels
Zhu, W. W., & Morosan, C. V. (2014) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-09-2013-0029 · Cited by 48
Sustainable IS Initialization Through Outsourcing: A Theory-Based Approach
Nedbal, D., Wetzlinger, W., Auinger, A., & Wagner, G. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 48
Mobile Libraries: Librarians’ and Students’ Perspectives
Aharony, N. (2014) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl12-415 · Cited by 48
Users' intrinsic and extrinsic drivers to use a web-based educational environment
Sánchez‐Franco, M. J., Peral, B. P., & Ramos, Á. F. V. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.001 · Cited by 53
Oostrom, J. K., van der Linden, D., Born, M. P., & van der Molen, H. T. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.025 · Cited by 58
A Conceptual Model of e-Government Acceptance in Public Sector
Sang, S., & Lee, J. (2009) · International Conference on the Digital Society · doi:10.1109/icds.2009.30 · Cited by 49
Phuantgthong, D., & Malisuwan, S. (2005) · The International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management · Cited by 48
Marchiori, D. M., Popadiuk, S., Mainardes, E. W., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03753-6 · Cited by 48
Effect of personal innovativeness on technology acceptance and use
Rosen, P. A. (2005) · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · Cited by 47
Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation
Maier, C., Laumer, S., Thatcher, J. B., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2022) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1047 · Cited by 56
Service innovation and usage intention: a cross-market analysis
Chiu, Y. H., & Hofer, K. M. (2015) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-10-2014-0274 · Cited by 47
Meng, B., Kim, M.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2014) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2014.958508 · Cited by 50
Attig, C., Wessel, D., & Franke, T. (2017) · Interacción · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58750-9_3 · Cited by 45
Consumer Acceptance Analysis of the Home Energy Management System
Park, E.-S., Hwang, B. Y., Ko, K., & Kim, D. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9122351 · Cited by 47
Online learning usage and performance among students within public universities in Yemen
Aldholay, A. H., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., Isaac, O., & Mutahar, A. M. (2018) · International Journal of Services and Standards · doi:10.1504/ijss.2018.091842 · Cited by 60
Adoption of 3D printing technology: an Innovation Diffusion Theory perspective
Marak, Z. R., Tiwari, A. K., & Tiwari, S. P. (2019) · International Journal of Innovation · doi:10.5585/iji.v7i1.393 · Cited by 48
Erskine, M. A., Khojah, M., & McDaniel, A. E. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.014 · Cited by 51
Determinants of individuals’ intention to use mobile health: insights from India
Pai, R. R., & Alathur, S. (2019) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-04-2019-0027 · Cited by 47
Determinants for Successful Digital Transformation
Oh, K., Kho, H.-S., Choi, Y., & Seogjun, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031215 · Cited by 47
Cornelissen, L., Egher, C., van Beek, V., Williamson, L., & Hommes, D. W. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/33368 · Cited by 46
Gunness, A., Matanda, M. J., & Rajaguru, R. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104884 · Cited by 50
Technology in farming: Unleashing farmers’ behavioral intention for the adoption of agriculture 5.0
Mishra, N., Bhandari, N., Maraseni, T., Devkota, N., Khanal, G., Bhusal, B., Basyal, D. K., Paudel, U. R., & Danuwar, R. K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308883 · Cited by 68
See you on Facebook: exploring influences on Facebook continuous usage
Chen, Y. (2013) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.826737 · Cited by 46
Huang, S., & Ku, H.-H. (2016) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 46
Loup‐Escande, É., Jamet, É., Ragot, M., Erhel, S., & Michinov, N. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1220105 · Cited by 46
Louah, L., Visser, M., Blaimont, A., & Cannière, C. D. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.001 · Cited by 47
Koohikamali, M., French, A. M., & Kim, D. J. (2019) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2019.02.007 · Cited by 45
The ideological divide in public perceptions of self-driving cars
Peng, Y. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520917339 · Cited by 46
Strebinger, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.1007/s40558-021-00219-0 · Cited by 46
Chen, R. R., Ou, C. X., Wang, W. C., Peng, Z., & Davison, R. M. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12265 · Cited by 46
Wei, S., Zhu, F., & Chen, X. S. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-09-2019-0499 · Cited by 49
Diéguez, A. I. I., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Blanco‐Oliver, A., & Lara‐Rubio, J. (2023) · European Journal of Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1108/ejmbe-12-2022-0374 · Cited by 45
This (AI)n’t fair? Employee reactions to artificial intelligence (AI) in career development systems
Köchling, A., Wehner, M., & Ruhle, S. A. (2024) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-024-00789-3 · Cited by 63
Lebeničnik, M., Pitt, I. J., & Starčič, A. I. (2015) · Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.26529/cepsj.144 · Cited by 45
Coursaris, C. K., Osch, W. V., Sung, J., Telecom, L., & Yun, Y. (2013) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00054 · Cited by 45
Althuizen, N. (2017) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12172 · Cited by 45
Factors affecting cloud computing adoption in the Indian school education system
Singh, J., & Mansotra, V. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09878-3 · Cited by 45
Huang, C.-Y., & Yang, M. (2020) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0182 · Cited by 45
Wang, G., Wang, P., Cao, D., & Luo, X. (2020) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/jcem.2020.12325 · Cited by 45
Oktavendi, T. W., & Mu’ammal, I. (2022) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-09-2021-0267 · Cited by 45
Rampersad, G., Plewa, C., & Troshani, I. (2011) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.09.002 · Cited by 47
Cocosila, M., & Archer, N. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005304 · Cited by 44
Jiménez, I. A. C., García, L. C. C., Marcolin, F., Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11104672 · Cited by 51
Tang, Z. R., & Chen, L. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101114 · Cited by 51
Hateftabar, F. (2022) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2022.2071682 · Cited by 45
AI-Enabled Service Continuance: Roles of Trust and Privacy Risk
Salih, L., Tarhini, A., & Açikgöz, F. (2025) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2025.2452544 · Cited by 59
Do I have to learn something new? Mental models and the acceptance of replacement technologies
Zhang, W. E., & Xu, P. (2010) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2010.489665 · Cited by 44
Chang, C.-W., Yeh, S., Li, M., & Yao, E. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2905143 · Cited by 44
Khazaei, H. (2019) · European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences · Cited by 44
Determinants and risks of intentions to use mobile applications in museums: an application of fsQCA
Carvajal-Trujillo, E., Molinillo, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1780200 · Cited by 48
Kaye, S.-A., Li, X., Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó., & Afghari, A. P. (2021) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.07.012 · Cited by 44
Role of interaction quality and trust in use of AI-based voice-assistant systems
Lee, O.-K. D., Ayyagari, R., Nasirian, F., & Ahmadian, M. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/jsit-07-2020-0132 · Cited by 44
Understanding the key antecedents of users’ continuance intention in the context of smart factory
Jo, H. (2021) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1970130 · Cited by 44
What Drives Consumers’ Decisions to Use Intelligent Agent Technologies? A Systematic Review
Sidlauskiene, J. (2021) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2021.1961192 · Cited by 43
Compeau, D., Correia, J., & Thatcher, J. B. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/15516 · Cited by 43
Adoption of AI Chatbots in Travel and Tourism Services
Hanji, S. V., Navalgund, N. R., Ingalagi, S. S., Desai, S., & Hanji, S. S. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3236-8_57 · Cited by 44
Gravitating towards Fintech: A study on Undergraduates using extended UTAUT model
Sultana, N., Chowdhury, R. S., & Haque, A. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20731 · Cited by 87
Si, H., Duan, X., Cheng, L., & Vos, J. D. (2023) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100688 · Cited by 43
Determinants inhibiting digital payment system adoption: an Indian perspective
Hussain, S., Gupta, S., & Bhardwaj, S. (2024) · Qualitative Research in Financial Markets · doi:10.1108/qrfm-09-2023-0223 · Cited by 54
Wu, Q., Tian, J., & Liu, Z. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-07193-w · Cited by 49
Moradi, H. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00530-4 · Cited by 43
Explaining factors affecting technological change adoption
Cœurderoy, R., Guilmot, N., & Vas, A. (2014) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2013-0540 · Cited by 43
Andreassen, T. W., & Streukens, S. (2013) · Managing Service Quality · doi:10.1108/09604521311287632 · Cited by 45
Determinants of online shopping: Examination of an early‐stage online market
Liebermann, Y., & Stashevsky, S. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.121 · Cited by 45
Reexamining Relative Advantage and Perceived Usefulness
Wang, Y., Meister, D. B., & Wang, Y. (2011) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/jicte.2011010105 · Cited by 43
Librarians' attitudes towards mobile services
Aharony, N. (2013) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ap-07-2012-0059 · Cited by 44
Junglas, I. A. (2006) · International Conference on Mobile Business · doi:10.1109/icmb.2006.40 · Cited by 43
Factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing in small and medium enterprises
Safari, F., Safari, N., Hassanzadeh, A., & Ghatari, A. R. (2015) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2015.070894 · Cited by 46
Kohles, J. C., Bligh, M. C., & Carsten, M. K. (2013) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715012459784 · Cited by 43
Understanding the Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption for High Performance Computing
Lynn, T., Liang, X., Gourinovitch, A., Morrison, J. P., Fox, G., & Rosati, P. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.489 · Cited by 45
Understanding and Predicting Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking
Hong, I. B. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070110 · Cited by 47
Does Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Travel Online Differ Across Generations?
Sharma, S., Singh, G., & Pratt, S. (2020) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2751 · Cited by 43
Fang, J.-M., Wen, C., & Prybutok, V. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.019 · Cited by 46
U-government: a framework for the evolution of e-government
Bélanger, F., Carter, L. D., & Schaupp, L. C. (2005) · Electronic Government an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2005.008333 · Cited by 43
Diffusion of virtual innovation
Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., & Scott, C. L. (2007) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1314234.1314243 · Cited by 43
Intention to Adopt AI-Powered Online Service Among Tourism and Hospitality Companies
Ho, Y., Alam, S. S., Masukujjaman, M., Lin, C., Susmit, S., & Susmit, S. (2022) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.299357 · Cited by 53
Exploring factors influencing educators’ adoption of ChatGPT: a mixed method approach
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., & Ibrahim, Y. (2023) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-07-2023-0127 · Cited by 59
Healthcare Voice AI Assistants: Factors Influencing Trust and Intention to Use
Zhan, X., Abdi, N., Seymour, W., & Such, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637339 · Cited by 46
Perceptions and drivers of the metaverse adoption: A mixed‐methods study
Adhini, N. V., & Prasad, C. V. V. S. N. V. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.13069 · Cited by 44
Pan, L., Haq, S. U., Shi, X., & Nadeem, M. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241265919 · Cited by 77
Technologically Reflective Individuals as Enablers of Social Innovation*
Schweitzer, F. M., Rau, C., Gassmann, O., & van den Hende, E. A. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12269 · Cited by 42
Intention to use mobile customer relationship management systems
Karjaluoto, H., Töllinen, A., Pirttiniemi, J., & Jayawardhena, C. (2014) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-11-2013-0480 · Cited by 42
Hidayanto, A. N., Hidayat, L. S., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., & Handayani, P. W. (2015) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2015.069065 · Cited by 45
Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2007) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.08.002 · Cited by 42
VCR: Virtual community recommender using the technology acceptance model and the user’s needs type
Lee, H.-Y., Ahn, H., & Han, I. (2006) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.012 · Cited by 42
University Student Perceptions of Technology Use in Mathematics Learning
Zogheib, B., Rabaa’i, A. A., Zogheib, S., & Saheli, A. E. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/2315 · Cited by 42
Hameed, I., Khan, M., Shahab, A., Hameed, I., & Qadeer, F. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8121280 · Cited by 43
Loup‐Escande, É., Frenoy, R., Poplimont, G., Thouvenin, I., Gapenne, O., & Mégalakaki, O. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.006 · Cited by 46
Avornyo, P., Fang, J., Antwi, C. O., Aboagye, M. O., & Boadi, E. A. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.001 · Cited by 42
Gupta, K. P. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-01-2020-0042 · Cited by 44
Wu, W., & Yu, L. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103688 · Cited by 44
An investigation of adoption intention of halal traceability system among food SMEs
Kamarulzaman, N. H., Muhamad, N. A., & Nawi, N. M. (2021) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-11-2020-0349 · Cited by 54
Shao, Z., & Li, X. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103597 · Cited by 41
Technology readiness, mobile payments and gender- a reflective-formative second order approach
Mesías, J. F. T., van Klyton, A. C., & Zúñiga-Collazos, A. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2054729 · Cited by 41
Main theoretical consumer behavioural models. A review from 1935 to 2021
Paz, M. D. R., & Vargas, R. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13895 · Cited by 62
Richness and dynamics: how to improve virtual reality tourism adoption with virtual social clues
Zhu, J., Jiang, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, Q., & Li, W. (2023) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-09-2022-0298 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- University of Dayton (US)
- ORCID
- Agarwal, Ritu
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-215
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2162061662
- Cited by
- 3,575
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 213 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 234 · 2021: 233 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 173 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 178 · 2014: 165 · 2013: 161 · 2012: 149
- FWCI
- 29.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- personal innovativeness, information technology adoption, technology acceptance model, moderating effect, operational measurement, psychometric validation, World Wide Web, user perception, construct definition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review