Cited by 450Customer churn and segmentationConsumer Market Behavior and PricingStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

“Counting Your Customers” the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model

Fader, Peter S., Hardie, Bruce G. S., Lee, Ka Lok·2005·Marketing Science

Abstract

Today’s managers are very interested in predicting the future purchasing patterns of their customers, which can then serve as an input into “lifetime value” calculations. Among the models that provide such capabilities, the Pareto/NBD “counting your customers” framework proposed by Schmittlein et al. (1987) is highly regarded. However, despite the respect it has earned, it has proven to be a difficult model to implement, particularly because of computational challenges associated with parameter estimation. We develop a new model, the beta-geometric/NBD (BG/NBD), which represents a slight variation in the behavioral “story” associated with the Pareto/NBD but is vastly easier to implement. We show, for instance, how its parameters can be obtained quite easily in Microsoft Excel. The two models yield very similar results in a wide variety of purchasing environments, leading us to suggest that the BG/NBD could be viewed as an attractive alternative to the Pareto/NBD in most applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.1040.0098

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of early studies on churn were conducted from a management perspective, especially CRM.

    “The majority of the early studies on churn were conducted from a management perspective, especially CRM (Customer Relation Management) [30] [31].”

    From A Survey on Churn Analysis in Various Business Domains (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Blattberg Robert C., 2001, Customer Equity
  2. Lozier D. W., 1995, Mathematics of Computation 1943–1993: A Half-Century of Computational Mathematics. Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • London Business School (GB)
  • Catalina Health Resource, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422
Venue
Marketing Science
Published
2005-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
OpenAlex
W2107581815
Cited by
450
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 13
FWCI
64.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
Pareto/NBD model, customer purchase patterns, customer lifetime value, parameter estimation, computational simplicity, count data models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review