The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dynamic Model of Brand Choice When Price and Advertising Signal Product Quality
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we develop a structural model of household behavior in an environment where there is uncertainty about brand attributes and both prices and advertising signal brand quality. Four quality signaling mechanisms are at work: (1) price signals quality, (2) advertising frequency signals quality, (3) advertising content provides direct (but noisy) information about quality, and (4) use experience provides direct (but noisy) information about quality. We estimate our proposed model using scanner panel data on ketchup. If price is important as a signal of brand quality, then frequent price promotion may have the unintended consequence of reducing brand equity. We use our estimated model to measure the importance of such effects. Our results imply that price is an important quality-signaling mechanism and that frequent price cuts can have significant adverse effects on brand equity. The role of advertising frequency in signaling quality is also significant, but it is less quantitatively important than price. In the printed version of Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 6, Erdem et al. (2008) was mistakenly identified as a Research Note. It is a regular article and has been corrected here and in the online table of contents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination
Ackerberg, D. A. (2003) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2354.t01-2-00098 · Cited by 476
Brand and Quantity Choice Dynamics Under Price Uncertainty
Erdem, T., Imai, S., & Keane, M. P. (2003) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1023536326497 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Cited by
An Empirical Analysis of User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet
Ghose, A., & Han, S. P. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1350 · Cited by 282
The dual role of price: Decomposing consumers’ reactions to price
Völckner, F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0076-7 · Cited by 160
Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence
Feng, J., Li, X., & Zhang, X. (. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0852 · Cited by 117
Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments
Sahni, N. S. (2015) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-015-9159-9 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdem, T., Keane, M. P., & Sun, B.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1111-1125
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W330495492
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.