The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices
Open accessAbstract
This paper seeks to quantify the long-term financial impact of negative word of mouth (NWOM), an issue that has long challenged extant research. We do so with real-world data on firm security prices. The developed time-series models innovatively uncover (1) short- and long-term effects of NWOM on cash flows, stock returns, and stock volatilities, and (2) NWOM's “wear-in” effects (i.e., it takes a number of months before the stock price impact of NWOM reaches the peak point) and “wear-out” effects (i.e., it takes several months after the peak before the stock price impact of NWOM dies out completely). In addition, the results related to endogeneity and feedback effects from the stock market are also interesting, supporting the idea that historical underperformance in stock prices may breed more harmful future buzz in a “vicious” cycle of NWOM. After controlling for competition, NWOM's long-term financial harm becomes more destructive in magnitude, kicks in more quickly, and haunts investors longer. Overall, these findings offer some unique implications for buzz management, time-series models quantifying the financial impact of word of mouth, and the marketing-finance interface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
Cited by
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 · Cited by 962
Self-citationSong, P., Xue, L., Rai, A., & Zhang, C. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13737 · Cited by 273
The effect of atmosphere on customer engagement in upscale hotels: an application of S-O-R paradigm
Choi, H., & Kandampully, J. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.012 · Cited by 257
Paving the way for “distinguished marketing”
Leeflang, P. (2011) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.004 · Cited by 80
Harnessing aspect-based sentiment analysis: How are tweets associated with forecast accuracy?
The Australian National University, A., Ho, S. Y., Choi, K. W. (., The Australian National University, A., Yang, F. (., & The Australian National University, A. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00564 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, X.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-165
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2137400580
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.