The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does it Pay to Change Your Company's Name? A Stock Market Perspective
Abstract
A company's name is commonly considered to be an integral part of its image, just like the quality of its products or the quality of its technical services. Changing a company's name is a major policy decision contemplated by many firms and actually implemented by some each year. This paper attempts to examine, albeit indirectly, whether a name change can improve the profit performance of a firm and what type of firm is more likely to succeed in doing so. We use the “event study” methodology developed in finance to examine the above questions with respect to 58 corporations that changed their names in 1981–1985. Our findings are that, for most of the firms, name changes are associated with improved performance, and that the greatest improvement tends to occur in firms that produce industrial goods and whose performance prior to the change was relatively poor. Evidence that industrial good producers are also heavy users of corporate advertising lends further credence to this finding. Our findings do not support, however, the contention that the new name per se will enhance demand for the firm's products. Rather, it seems that the act of a name change serves as a signal that other measures to improve performance such as changes in product offerings and organizational changes will be seriously and successfully undertaken. The rationale behind why such a signal is sent and why it is believed is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x · Cited by 19,441
The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance
Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260996 · Cited by 3,653
Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process
Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90049-8 · Cited by 1,213
Cited by
Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis
Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200102 · Cited by 2,357
Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities
Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0153 · Cited by 2,323
The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis
Agrawal, J., & Kamakura, W. A. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900305 · Cited by 934
The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality
Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152193 · Cited by 789
The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality
Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100204 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Horsky, D., & Swyngedouw, P.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 320-335
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2087164452
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does it Pay to Change Your Company's Name? A Stock Market Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.6.4.320
- The paper
- Horsky, D., & Swyngedouw, P. (1987). Does it Pay to Change Your Company's Name? A Stock Market Perspective. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.6.4.320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.