The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the role of consumer preferences, costs, and price competition in determining the competitive product strategy of a firm. In the model studied here, there are two identical firms competing on product quality and price. They face consumers who prefer a higher quality product to a lower quality product, but differ in how much they are willing to pay for quality. The consumers can also choose a substitute if they don't like the product-price offerings of the two firms. For the firms, a higher quality product costs more to produce than a lower quality product. The paper shows that the equilibrium strategy for each firm should be to differentiate its product from its competitor, with the firm choosing the higher quality choosing the higher margin as well. This differentiation, however, is not efficient—that is, it is possible to choose two other products and offer them at prices that cover their marginal cost, and still satisfy consumers' “needs” better in the aggregate. A monopolist, by contrast, would differentiate his product line efficiently. This suggests that cannibalization has different effects on product strategy than competition. The paper also shows that if one firm enters the market first, then it can defend itself from later entrants, and gain a first-mover advantage, by preempting the most desirable product position.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing
Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu‐Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12040 · Cited by 438
‘Masstige’ marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda
Kumar, A., Paul, J., & Unnithan, A. B. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.030 · Cited by 437
A Contingent View of Quality Management‐The Impact of International Competition on Quality
Das, A., Handfield, R. B., Calantone, R. J., & Ghosh, S. (2000) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00938.x · Cited by 331
Bohlmann, J. D., Golder, P. N., & Mitra, D. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1175.175 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Moorthy, K. S.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-168
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2119406282
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.7.2.141
- The paper
- Moorthy, K. S. (1988). Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.7.2.141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.