The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms
Abstract
How do firms avoid being “fenced in” by owners of patented technologies used, perhaps unknowingly, in the design or manufacture of their products? This paper examines the conditions under which firms expand their own portfolios of patents in response to potential hold-up problems in markets for technology. Combining insights from transactions cost theory with recent scholarship on intellectual property and its exchange, I predict firms will patent more aggressively than otherwise expected when markets for technology are highly fragmented (i.e., ownership rights to external technologies are widely distributed); this effect should be more pronounced for firms with large investments in technology-specific assets and under a strong legal appropriability regime. Although these characteristics of firms and their external environments have been highlighted in the theoretical literature, prior research has not explored the extent to which such factors interact to shape the patenting behavior of firms. To empirically test these hypotheses, I develop a citations-based “fragmentation index” and estimate the determinants of patenting for 67 U.S. semiconductor firms between 1980 and 1994. Accumulating exclusionary rights of their own may enable firms to safeguard their investments in new technologies while foregoing some of the costs and delays associated with ex ante contracting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565
Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study
Mansfield, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products
Fosfuri, A., Giarratana, M. S., & Luzzi, A. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0321 · Cited by 229
Jones, S. L., Leiponen, A., & Vasudeva, G. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3244 · Cited by 95
Ivus, O., Park, W. G., & Saggi, K. (2017) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0100-1 · Cited by 53
Ramasubbu, N., & Kemerer, C. F. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870377 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziedonis, R. H.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 804-820
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3123057980
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 43.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.