The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance
Abstract
This paper empirically documents the association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. The results are based on a sample of 885 glitches announced by publicly traded firms. Changes in various operating performance metrics for the sample firms are compared against a sample of control firms of similar size and from similar industries. In the year leading up to the announcement, the control-adjusted mean percent changes in operating income, return on sales, and return on assets for the sample firms are −107%, −114%, and −92%, respectively. During this same period, the control-adjusted changes in the level of return on sales and return on assets are −13.78% and −2.32%, respectively. Relative to controls, firms that experience glitches report on average 6.92% lower sales growth, 10.66% higher growth in cost, and 13.88% higher growth in inventories. More importantly, firms do not quickly recover from the negative economic consequences of glitches. During the two-year time period after the glitch announcement, operating income, sales, total costs, and inventories do not improve. We also find that it does not matter who caused the glitch, what the reason was for the glitch, or what industry a firm belongs to—glitches are associated with negative operating performance across the board.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002 · Cited by 1,400
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1387680 · Cited by 895
OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review
Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016) · IIE Transactions · doi:10.1080/0740817x.2015.1067735 · Cited by 854
Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities: Impact on supply chain and firm performance
Kroes, J. R., & Ghosh, S. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.004 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 695-711
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2075219207
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 69.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0353
- The paper
- Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.