Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination
Abstract
This paper expands our understanding of factors that contribute to development of firm resilience to supply chain disruptions. In doing so, we operationalize firm resilience to understand how supply chain disruption orientated firms can develop resilience to supply chain disruptions. We find that supply chain disruption orientation alone is not enough for a firm to develop resilience. Supply chain disruption oriented firms require the ability to reconfigure resources or have a risk management resource infrastructure to develop resilience. The way in which supply chain disruption oriented firms develop resilience through resource reconfiguration or risk management infrastructure depends on the context of the disruption as high impact or low impact. In a high impact disruption context, resource reconfiguration fully mediates the relationship between supply chain disruption orientation and firm resilience. In a low impact disruption context, supply chain disruption orientation and risk management infrastructure have a synergistic effect on developing firm resilience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizational leadership, strategy, resource capacity and human resource capability can facilitate restructuring business operations to deal with unprecedented events.
“Studies have also highlighted the was organizational leadership, strategy, resource capacity and human resource capability can facilitate restructuring business operations to deal with unprecedented events (Ambulkar et al., 2015).”
From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as Ambulkar et al., 2015
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117 · see citing works
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383 · see citing works
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549 · see citing works
A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY<sup>1</sup>
LAWSHE, C. H. (1975) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x · Cited by 7,313 · see citing works
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152 · see citing works
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Iacobucci, D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 · Cited by 2,263 · see citing works
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The ability to manage resources and reconfigure them according to the environmental setting is critical to firm survival and superior firm performance (Sapienza et al., 2006; Sirmon et al., 2007; Davis et al., 2009).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Chowdhury, M. T., Sarkar, A., Paul, S. K., & Moktadir, M. A. (2022) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-020-00166-9 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Islam, M. T., & Chadee, D. (2024) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102248 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blackhurst, Jennifer
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-18
- Volume
- 33-34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-122
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1966146586
- Cited by
- 1,400
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 233 · 2025: 209 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 222 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 67.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- supply chain resilience, supply chain disruption, resource reconfiguration, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
