Cited by 75International Business and FDIEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Economic Institutions and the Location Strategies of European Multinationals in their Geographic Neighborhood

Open access
Ascani, Andrea, Crescenzi, Riccardo, Iammarino, Simona·2016·Economic Geography

Abstract

This article investigates how the location behavior of multinational enterprises (MNEs) is shaped by the economic institutions of the host countries. The analysis covers a wide set of geographically proximate economies with different degrees of integration with the old fifteen European Union members: new member states, accession and candidate countries, as well as European Neighborhood Policy countries and the Russian Federation. The article aims to shed new light on the heterogeneity of MNE preferences for the host countries’ regulatory settings (including labor market and business regulation), legal aspects (i.e., protection of property rights and contract enforcement), and the weight of the government in the economy. By employing data on 6888 greenfield investment projects, the random-coefficient mixed logit analysis shows that, although the quality of the national institutional framework is generally beneficial for the attraction of foreign investment, MNEs’ preferences over economic institutions are highly heterogeneous across sectors and business functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00130095.2016.1179570

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Favorable business regulations, IP protection, and significant education spending typically attract technologically and functionally sophisticated activities.

    “Among these factors, favorable business regulations, IP protection, and significant education spending typically attract technologically and functionally sophisticated activities (Amendolagine et al., 2019;Ascani et al., 2016;Pipkin & Fuentes, 2017).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Ascani et al., 2016

  • Lead MNEs operating in high- and medium-technology sectors and/or locating knowledge-intensive functions in host markets are more likely to pursue ownership in jurisdictions that offer weaker IP protection.

    “Further, control decisions are linked to sectoral and functional factors -for example, lead MNEs operating in high-and medium-technology sectors and/or locating knowledge-intensive functions (e.g., innovation) in host markets are more likely to pursue ownership in jurisdictions that offer weaker IP protection (Ascani, Crescenzi, & Iammarino, 2016).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Ascani, Crescenzi, & Iammarino, 2016

  • The impact of host country institutional environment on GVCs is heterogeneous: it varies across GVCs, depending on specific functions/activities being offshored, internationalization motives, and lead firm-level strategies and capabilities.

    “However, the impact of host country institutional environment on GVCs is heterogeneous: while it is tempting to assume that lead firms are attracted by favorable local business regulations and strong institutions, this impact in fact varies across GVCs, depending on specific functions/activities being offshored, internationalization motives, and lead firm-level strategies and capabilities (Ascani”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Ascani et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 125 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bandelj, N. 2009. The Global Economy as Instituted Process: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe. American Sociological Review, 74, 128-149.
  2. Cantwell, J., and Iammarino, S. 2003. Multinational Corporations and European Regional System of Innovation. London and New York: Routledge.
  3. Dunning, J.H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity. Proceedings of a Nobel Symposium held at Stockholm, London: McMillan, 395-418.
  4. _______. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: in defence of the eclectic theory. Journal of International Business Studies 19, 1-31.
  5. Head, K., Ries, J., and Swenson, D. 1995. Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing plants. Journal of International Economics 38 (3-4), 223-247.
  6. Xu, D., and Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional Distance and Multinational enterprises. Academy of Management Review 27(4), 608-618.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ascani, A., Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Ascani, Andrea
  • Crescenzi, Riccardo
  • Iammarino, Simona
Venue
Economic Geography
Published
2016-06-06
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
401-429
ISSN
  • 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8287
OpenAlex
W2275021452
Cited by
75
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • LSE Research Online Documents on Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (Doctoral Studentship (2011-2014))
  • European Research Council (639633-MASSIVE-ERC-2014-STG)
  • European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-SSH - 2010.2.2-1 (266834))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Zones and Regional Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
economic institutions, foreign direct investment, greenfield investment, labor market regulation, trade regulation, property rights protection, contract enforcement, role of the state in the economy, institutional heterogeneity, EU enlargement, European Neighbourhood Policy, Russia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review