The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?
Open accessAbstract
A large literature documents that women are different from men in their choices and preferences, but little is known about gender differences in the boardroom. If women must be like men to break the glass ceiling, we might expect gender differences to disappear among directors. Using a large survey of directors, we show that female and male directors differ systematically in their core values and risk attitudes, but in ways that differ from gender differences in the general population. These results are robust to controlling for differences in observable characteristics. Consistent with findings for the population, female directors are more benevolent and universally concerned but less power oriented than male directors. However, in contrast to findings for the population, they are less tradition and security oriented than their male counterparts. They are also more risk loving than male directors. Thus, having a woman on the board need not lead to more risk-averse decision making. This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, Teck Ho, and Terrance Odean, special issue editors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067 · Cited by 3,186
Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.67 · Cited by 1,391
Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008) · Handbook of Experimental Economics Results · doi:10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00113-8 · Cited by 924
Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410701397164 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7 · Cited by 381
Women and Leadership: How Do Women Leaders Contribute to Companies' Sustainable Choices?
Pierli, G., Murmura, F., & Palazzi, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2022.930116 · Cited by 52
Algorithmic Supervisor and Employee Performance
Gu, W., Li, M., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478251331095 · Cited by 10
The Cocksure Conundrum: How Evolution Created a Gendered Currency of Corporate Overconfidence
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W. (2022) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-022-00197-5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, R. B., & Funk, P.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-235
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3121672546
- Cited by
- 1,537
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 56.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.