The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption
Abstract
This paper studies government subsidies for green technology adoption while considering the manufacturing industry’s response. Government subsidies offered directly to consumers impact the supplier’s production and pricing decisions. Our analysis expands the current understanding of the price-setting newsvendor model, incorporating the external influence from the government, who is now an additional player in the system. We quantify how demand uncertainty impacts the various players (government, industry, and consumers) when designing policies. We further show that, for convex demand functions, an increase in demand uncertainty leads to higher production quantities and lower prices, resulting in lower profits for the supplier. With this in mind, one could expect consumer surplus to increase with uncertainty. In fact, we show that this is not always the case and that the uncertainty impact on consumer surplus depends on the trade-off between lower prices and the possibility of underserving customers with high valuations. We also show that when policy makers such as governments ignore demand uncertainty when designing consumer subsidies, they can significantly miss the desired adoption target level. From a coordination perspective, we demonstrate that the decentralized decisions are also optimal for a central planner managing jointly the supplier and the government. As a result, subsidies provide a coordination mechanism. This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management
Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2004) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b139000 · Cited by 2,243
Andreyeva, T., Long, M. W., & Brownell, K. D. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.151415 · Cited by 1,141
Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty
(2011) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19257-9 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Artificial Shortage in Agricultural Supply Chains
Levi, R., Singhvi, S., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2021.1010 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, M. C., Lobel, R., & Perakis, G.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1235-1258
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3123598766
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2173
- The paper
- Cohen, M. C., Lobel, R., & Perakis, G. (2016). The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.