Cited by 1,141Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsConsumer Market Behavior and PricingConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The Impact of Food Prices on Consumption: A Systematic Review of Research on the Price Elasticity of Demand for Food

Open access
Andreyeva, Tatiana, Long, Michael W., Brownell, Kelly D.·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

In light of proposals to improve diets by shifting food prices, it is important to understand how price changes affect demand for various foods. We reviewed 160 studies on the price elasticity of demand for major food categories to assess mean elasticities by food category and variations in estimates by study design. Price elasticities for foods and nonalcoholic beverages ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 (absolute values), with food away from home, soft drinks, juice, and meats being most responsive to price changes (0.7–0.8). As an example, a 10% increase in soft drink prices should reduce consumption by 8% to 10%. Studies estimating price effects on substitutions from unhealthy to healthy food and price responsiveness among at-risk populations are particularly needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2008.151415

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Revisions in the WIC Food Packages: Interim Rule Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture; 2007 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreyeva, T., Long, M. W., & Brownell, K. D.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-02
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
216-222
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2076181356
Cited by
1,141
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 63
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rudd Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
food prices, price elasticity, dietary intake, soft drinks, eating out, meat consumption, non-alcoholic beverages, diet quality, food policy, vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Food, Food Preferences, Humans, Taxes, United States, Models, Econometric, Nutrition Policy, Food Industry, Economic Recession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review